|
NOTICE OF ACTION
Meeting of the
ENFIELD INLAND WETLANDS AND WATERCOURSES AGENCY
TUESDAY, MARCH 5, 2002
PUBLIC HEARING, if applicable - 7:00 P.M.
OR
REGULAR MEETING -- 7:00 P.M:
********COUNCIL CHAMBERS********
*********ENFIELD TOWN HALL*********
***820 ENFIELD STREET,***
**ENFIELD, CT**
7:00 P.M.: PUBLIC HEARING
1. Call To Order The meeting was called to order by Chairperson Gretchen Pfeifer-Hall at 7:00 p.m.
Roll Call Present were: Chairperson Pfeifer-Hall and Agents Olsen, Storey, Sarno, Bergamini, and Szewczak. Agent Poirot was not present. Also present were Jay O. Northrup, Wetlands Agent and Susan Swiatek, Recording Secretary.
2. Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag
IW 336.02, Application of Enfield Ventures, for amendment of a permit granted to Berkshire Development, LLC, (a partner in Enfield Ventures) for regulated activities associated with the construction of a commercial development of a hotel and restaurant to be located on the southwest corner of Hazard and Phoenix Avenues. [Submitted Jan. 9, Rec'ed Jan. 15, PPE Jan. 30, MPHCD Mar.21, SLMPHCD May 4, 2002]
Agent Storey excused himself from discussion on this application due to a potential conflict of interest. Mr. William Goebel of Bohler Engineering briefly reviewed the proposed changes to the previously approved plans. The hotel will now be parallel with Phoenix Avenue and have 90 guest rooms. The plans show the same amount of disturbance to the wetlands and regulated areas. Dr. Paul Davis, Soil Scientist also noted that road access to the hotel and restaurant have been changed, making the access closer to the regulated area. Storm water and mitigation plans remain the same as the originally approved application. In response to a question by Agent Szewczak, Mr. Goebel noted that the elevations of the hotel have changed 1 foot or less. He also explained, in answer to a question by Mr. Northrup, that a brief analysis of the drainage shed areas have been done and are outlined in a letter dated January 30, 2002. The Town Engineer has not provided any written comments on IW 336.02. Members briefly reviewed the drainage plans. Mr. Goebel explained that the developed area will include 3 drainage sheds. The north portion, near the restaurant, will discharge into the north west portion through a series of plunge pools. The 2nd system takes in the south west corner and utilizes a water quality swale and plunge pools. The remaining area on the easterly side of the property drains through plunge pools and sediment basins. In response to concerns by Agency members, Mr. Goebel agreed to end the grading and grass swale at the wetland line. There was no response to Chairperson Pfeifer-Hall's invitation for audience comments on this application. After further brief discussion, Agent Szewczak made a motion, seconded by Agent Olsen, and unanimously voted to close this public hearing. Vote was 5-0-0.
Agent Storey returned to the meeting at this time.
"
IW 366, Application of Margaret Pappas, for regulated activities associated with construction of River Meadows Section II subdivision, to be located west of, and on an extension of Meetinghouse Lane (River Meadows Section I), and off Riverview Street, 650+/- of the intersection with Bridge Lane. [Submitted Jan. 25, Rec'ed Feb. 5, PPE Feb. 19, MPHCD Apr. 5, SLMPHCD May 20, SLMPHAD Jun. 24, 2002]
Mr. Northrup read a letter from Timothy Coon of J.R. Russo Associates, dated March 5, 2002, withdrawing IW application #366. Mr. Northrup also read a letter from abutting property owner, Halina Hepp regarding her concern that this subdivision could result in a potential violation of her riparian rights. Mr. Northrup explained that this is an issue between the property owners and the Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Agency is not obligated to consider this information. He also noted that Ms. Hepp was notified of the public hearing in a proper, legal manner. Chairperson Pfeifer-Hall invited audience comments on this application. No one in the audience came forward to speak on this application. A motion was made by Agent Olsen and seconded by Agent Szewczak to accept withdrawal of IW 366. Vote was 6-0-0.
4. Continue or Closing Hearing(s) A motion was made by Agent Sarno, seconded by Agent Storey to close the public hearing portion of the meeting at 7:35 p.m. Vote was 6-0-0.
REGULAR MEETING
1. Call To Order The regular meeting was called to order by Chairperson Pfeifer-Hall at 7:36 p.m.
2 Roll Call Present were: Chairperson Pfeifer-Hall and Agents Olsen, Storey, Sarno, Bergamini, and Szewczak. Agent Poirot was not present. Also present were Jay O. Northrup, Wetlands Agent and Susan Swiatek, Recording Secretary.
3. Executive Session - Matters regarding specific employees, pending litigation, acquisition of real estate and / or matters exempt from disclosure requirements, as need. The specific reason should be stated for each session. There were no items for discussion in executive session.
4. Public Participation - Issues of concern not on the agenda. There were no audience comments
5. Correspondence.
Correspondence was as follows: email from Christine Nelson giving notice of an upcoming discussion on March 25, 2002 of Invasive Plants in the State of Connecticut; information received by Mr. Northrup at a recent American Planning Association meeting regarding Connecticut's Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Act and a separate document on public hearing procedures; email from Phil McLellan of Connecticut DEP regarding grassland bird migration work at the prison property; Wetlands Agent's Report dated February 5, 2002 to March 4, 2002, as well as a one page addendum regarding IW 366; notice of Northern CT Land Trust Butterfly and Garden Tour on June 19, 2002; notice of workshops on Connecticut's Inland Wetlands & Watercourses in 2002; public water supply watershed project notification form for IW 369 (Cooper Street reconstruction project); letter from Hazardville Water Company regarding public water service for the proposed 7 lot subdivision on Post Road, IW 368; letter from Bohler Engineering regarding drainage areas for IW 336.02; letter from Enfield Ventures Partnership, LLC regarding IW 336.02; updated copy of bylaws for EIWWCA; notice of annual seedling & plant sale to benefit Tolland County and Hartford County Soil and Water Conservation Districts.
Chairperson Pfeifer-Hall suggested that seedlings could be purchased and planted in the open space area off Abbe Road.
6. Commissioner's Correspondence
There were no items of Commissioner's Correspondence brought up for discussion.
7. Approval of Minutes - February 19, 2002. After brief review, a motion was made by Agent Storey and seconded by Agent Sarno to accept the minutes of the meeting of February 19, 2002 as presented. Vote was 3-0-3(Agents Olsen, Bergamini, and Szewczak)
Wetlands Agent Report - for February 19, 2002 to March 4, 2002 Members held lengthy review and discussion of the Agent's Report. Mr. Northrup updated the Agency members on several items of general inspection. Mr. Northrup visited 9 Manning Road (IW 370). The owner is limited in useable area for his proposed garage. The Boticello gravel pit was also visited on February 20 and March 5. Mr. Northrup hopes to send a letter by the end of this week stating that the first portions of the permit are complete. The Town's Public Works Department will be submitting an application to correct a collapsed headwall and resulting erosion on Post Office Road, east of Raffia Road. Mr. Northrup conducted a site walk with the developer of the Neelans Road Subdivision regarding acceptable tree cutting practices. Mr. Northrup also conducted a site walk of the property for IW 368. He found several vernal pools as well as a possible pingo pothole. The farm road that runs through a portion of the property has a great deal of bulky waste along it. The Town's Public Works Department has been asked to provide soil and erosion controls on the new Senior Center construction site on Elm Street. Chairperson Pfeifer-Hall expressed concern that the Town is not setting a good example. Agent Storey suggested that the Clerk of the Works for all Town jobs should meet with Staff regarding matters such as these. At the Still Meadow Subdivision on Broad Brook Road, Mr. Northrup found no soil and erosion control measures in place. There was a sand bar forming at the outlet of the drainage system off the new subdivision. Also, the conservation easement was violated. The developer will be required to remove the debris and plant new trees. Conservation Easement markers need to be erected. Mr. Northrup has been trying to contact the owner of property across from Salerno Drive regarding tree cutting activities which are very close to wetlands. The trees range in size from 6" to 24" in caliper. An ART meeting was held to discuss a possible gas station to be located in the Stop & Shop Parking lot at 54 Hazard Avenue. Mr. Northrup was a recent guest speaker at the Terra Nova alternative High School. He discussed wetlands, water supplies, and waste water treatment systems. Mr. Northrup met with a DEP representative and engineering consultant for property owners of Town & Country Tire on Hazard Avenue regarding remediation of a gasoline spill from roughly 20 years ago. The pollution is approximately 12' deep into the water table. The proposed pit will need to be de-watered. A portion of the plume located under Hazard Avenue will be treated with an oxygen-removing compound which do not result in any toxic by-products.
8. Old Business
" For Discussion Regarding a Decision:
IW 336.02, Application of Enfield Ventures, for amendment of a permit granted to Berkshire Development, LLC, (a partner in Enfield Ventures) for regulated activities associated with the construction of a commercial development of a hotel and restaurant to be located on the southwest corner of Hazard and Phoenix Avenues. [Submitted Jan. 9, Rec'ed Jan. 15, PPE Jan. 30, MPHCD Mar.21, SLMPHCD May 4, 2002] IW 366, Application of Agent Storey excused himself from discussion on this application due to a potential conflict of interest. Mr. Northrup noted that there are no outstanding issues other than lack of comment by the Town's Engineering Department. Members discussed two additional conditions of approval. After discussion, Agent Bergamini made a motion which was seconded by Agent Olsen to approve IW 336.02 with the 10 standard conditions, as well as additional conditions numbered 11 through 26:
11. A Wetlands Scientist shall be retained by the permitee to oversee the installation, and observation during the subsequent five growing seasons, of the mitigation efforts including the area(s) of wetland creation and restoration / enhancement. If the recommendations of the Wetland Scientist document that the design goals of the wetland replacement and restoration / enhancement site(s) have been achieved the EIWWA (formerly the ECC/IWWA) may reduce the monitoring period to a minimum of three years.
a. A copy of the contract between the applicant and the Wetlands Scientist must be submitted to the Planning office. It must cover the approved time periods for monitoring, the design goals that must be verified, and authority for the Wetland Scientist to require on-site design changes that will achieve the wetland creation / enhancement goals through the monitoring period.
b. If the contract is terminated prematurely the applicant must notify the EIWWA (formerly the ECC/IWWA) immediately and within fourteen (14) days furnish a copy of a contract with a new Wetlands Scientist that meets all the criteria stated above.
c. The Wetlands Agent and ECC/IWWA must approve the contract, before this permit will be valid.
12. The Wetland Scientist shall submit reports to the EIWWA (Formerly the ECC/IWWC) verifying to the best of his / her professional judgment:
a.) after the areas(s) have been excavated that there are hydraulic conditions that will support seasonal water retention and/or wetland vegetation,
b.) after the invasive vegetation has been removed from the property, that all such vegetation has been sufficiently removed to reduce an on-site seed bank to the maximum extent practicable within the project area, that could occupy the mitigated area(s),
c.) after it has been determined by laboratory measure or in-field texture characterization if the existing soils have sufficient organic and sand content, or not, that the soils exist or have been put in place that have sufficient organic and sand content,
d.) after examination of as-build topography for the rough grading, that the mitigation site has the appropriate contouring to support a diversity of vegetation based on the approved site plan and in-field conditions observed during excavation,
e.) after the vegetation has been planted, that the vegetation is, of a variety, in a random pattern, consist of trees, shrubs and seeding mix as depicted on the planting plan and as having been directed by the Wetlands Scientist,
f.) after the coarse woody debris has been placed throughout the wetland restoration area(s), that it provides structural diversity for the wetlands,
g.) after the access area has been utilized, that it is properly restored,
h.) by July 1 and August 1 of the year of construction and subsequent two (2) years, an inspection has been conducted, that all invasive plants have been hand cut and properly removed from the site along with the performance of any other corrective actions deemed necessary by the Wetlands Scientist and,
i.) in the third year after construction, after inspections have been made both prior to July 1 and after August 1 that all invasive plants have been treated with glyphosate based herbicide (e.g., Round-uptm) and properly removed from the site along with the performance of any other corrective actions deemed necessary by the Wetlands Scientist.
13. A performance surety bond in the appropriate form shall be posted for 125% of the cost estimated by the applicant for the creation, restoration and enhancement as proposed in the "Preliminary Site Plan Set for Berkshire Development, Proposed Hotel/Restaurant, Enfield Memorial Industrial Park, Parcel BR-1, Hazard and Phoenix Avenues, Town of Enfield, Hartford County, Connecticut, Bohler Engineering, P.C., Civil & Consulting Engineers, Project Managers, Environmental & Site Planners, Municipal Engineers, 352 Turnpike Road, Suite 105, Southboro, MA 01772," with sheets revised 1/30/02. Based on the current cost estimate presented to the Agency, the bond shall be in the amount of $137,500.00. Should the cost of the work be increased the bond shall be increase to 125% of the revised costs. The bond shall be released by a vote of the Enfield Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Agency upon an inspection and determination that the work was completed, as approved and completed to the agency's satisfaction. In addition, the bond shall not be removed until the monitoring period mentioned elsewhere in the permit conditions is satisfied. Release of the bond by any other agency, board or commission does not remove the permittee's obligations with regard to this permit condition.
14. Fertilizers or pesticides shall only be applied on this property for control of invasive plant species and for the support of initial grass growth that will control erosion.
15. No plants shall be utilized on the site, or listed in the landscaping schedule, that are on the list of Non-native Invasive Plant Species prepared by the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection.
16. Only native, wet cultivars shall be planted within the mitigation areas.
17. The site contractor shall certify to the Wetland Scientist and Enfield Wetlands Agent that any fill or top-dressing brought on site is free of seeds and fragments of invasive species.
18. The limits of clearing on site shall not exceed the outside (west and south, including the wetland creation area) line of erosion fencing shown on sheet 7 of 11, "Soil Erosion & Sediment Control Plan".
19. A second line of erosion fencing shall be placed no closer than two feet (2') from that shown on the plan referenced in the previous condition.
20. The applicant shall submit an operations and maintenance plan for the water quality structures, including the hooded catchbasins, storm cepter, stilling basin, sediment filter basin, vegetated pooling area, etc., before this permit shall be valid.
21. With the exception of the addition of the items stated in these conditions, this application is approved in accordance with the plans titled " S & H Development, Proposed Preliminary Site Plan Set, Hazard and Phoenix Avenues, Town of Enfield, Hartford, County, Connecticut" sheets 1-7 of 11 and "Preliminary Site Plan Set for Berkshire Development Proposed Hotel / Restaurant, Enfield Memorial Industrial Park, Parcel BR-1, Hazard and Phoenix Avenues, Town of Enfield, Hartford County, Connecticut, Bohler Engineering, Civil & Consulting Engineers, Project Managers, Environmental & Site Planners, Municipal Engineers, 352 Turnpike Road, Suite 105, Southboro, Ma 01772," sheets 8-11, with sheets revised to 1/30/02. Any changes that would potentially cause greater impact to wetlands or watercourses, such as enlargement or reorientation of building footprints, from the plans and any denial or changes made by any other regulatory agency or commission shall require the permitee to come before the Enfield Conservation Commission and Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Commission for a Determination of Permit Need (Jurisdictional Ruling).
22. Onsite storage of excavated materials, fill for the surcharge loading, and backfill materials will be minimized. This material will be stored or stockpiled only to the most northern area of the site, if necessary. Silt and soil runoffs into southern areas containing highly functional wetlands will be considered a violation of this permit.
23. The Contractor and Engineer shall use a dewatering method during excavations for removal of existing fill materials, footing construction and utility installations that will make the maximum use of an appropriate filtration system for the removal of fines from the dewatered area. The use of filtered sumps, and crushed stone wrapped in filter fabric have been mentioned in the Geotechnical Engineering Report dated June 23, 2000, Project 3452, and should be used to minimize the silt and soil fined transport.
24. Copies of the easements being provided by the permitee, including a legal description, should be filed in the land records. A copy shall be provided to the Enfield Conservation Commission and Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Agency. Failure to submit an easement will be considered a substantial change to this approval requiring a jurisdictional ruling such as referred to in condition 21, above.
25. The approval of this permit is conditional upon a favorable review of the submitted drainage report by the Town Engineering staff.
26. In contrast to the approved plans, the grass swale on the southeast corner of the developed area shall be shortened so that it terminates outside of wetland soils. After considering all reasonable and prudent alternatives, the reason for approval was that the project, with mitigation, will not adversely affect wetlands and watercourses. Vote was 5-0-0.
Agent Storey returned to the meeting at this time.
" IW 366, Margaret Pappas, for regulated activities associated with construction of River Meadows Section II subdivision, to be located west of, and on an extension of Meetinghouse Lane (River Meadows Section I), and off Riverview Street, 650+/- of the intersection with Bridge Lane. [Submitted Jan. 25, Rec'ed Feb. 5, PPE Feb. 19, MPHCD Apr. 5, SLMPHCD May 20, SLMPHAD Jun. 24, 2002] It was noted that the application had been withdrawn by written letter.
" IW 368, Application of Joseph Aloisa and David Fredrick for regulated activities associated with a seven lot, open space subdivision, to be located on the south side of Post Road 2500 feet +/- east of Phoenix Avenue, to be referred to as Olde Post Road Estates. [Submitted Feb. 1, Rec/ed Feb. 19, PPE Mar.5, MAD Apr. 25, SLMAD Jun. 29, 2002] The applicants and their representatives discussed the proposed subdivision with the Agency members. Mr. T.J. Barise P.E., of Ed Lally and Associates outlined the plans for the 32 acre parcel located approximately 2,500 feet east of Phoenix Avenue. They are proposing 7 lots, to be serviced by public water and sewer. It is a very flat parcel, with gently sloping away from the road. All lots will have a conservation easement at the rear. There will be no direct impact to wetlands, except for reseeding of lawns in what is now a field. Corner fencing will be installed at property lines where it intersects with the conservation easement. There will also be a row of trees planted along the easement line, as well as appropriate plantings. They are proposing Austrian pines, Crab Apple, Oaks, and Maple trees. Other plantings include black cherry, ironwood, and witch hazel. None of the plantings are wetland type, but do provide mitigation. Lengthy discussion was held on the ability to gain access to the rear portion of land to be designated as open space. Chairperson Pfeifer-Hall noted that, while at this time it has not been determined if the Town or a private organization will be the owner, access from the road will be necessary. Lot #1 now has 200' frontage, which is more than required. A portion of this lot could be cut off to provide a connection to the area in back to be deeded for open space. It was also requested that a small parking area be provided, once construction of the project is complete. Mr. Frederick agreed to provide a deeded access to the open space parcel from Post Road. He also agreed that the access would include land suitable to provide for a parking area of approximately 60' x 40'. (The idea was to provide for approximately three (3) spaces and the entrance, exit and aisle.) There was discussion of the parking being provided by the developer or at some later date by whoever received it, but the issue was not resolved. Also discussed was the possibility of a pond on the property. Agent Olsen had visited the property and noted that it runs parallel to the street. It is not noted on the applicant's plans. Ms. Benno, a biologist, stated that there is a ponded area, but did not believe it to be a pond. She visited the site in February, so could not be sure if any vernal pools exist on the site. In response to questions by Agency members, Mr. Barise stated that the water table varies from 12" to 20" on the house sites. The soils are Aquent, Swanton, Walpole Loam, Ninigret, and Made Land. Mr. Northrup noted that the area to be designated as open space contains a great deal of rubbish, such as old furnaces, bicycles, and machinery. He suggested that the area be cleaned prior to the property being deeded to the Town or other organization. Members discussed the issue of bonding to cover cost of the plants, labor, and mulching. Mr. Northrup has not yet had a chance to review the planting plan. The species suggested by the applicant are for transitional areas, not wetlands. Agent Storey noted that suggested Condition #12 does not allow for heavy equipment in the conservation easement area, possibly making it impossible to remove some of the larger items found there. Mr. Northrup replied that most could be picked up and put on a pick up truck from the existing farm road. Moderate winter weather would be the best time for their removal. After discussion, Condition #12 was re-worded to state that means of removal of the items shall not have an adverse affect on the wetlands. Also discussed at length, but found to be unfeasible, was the possibility of connecting an existing paved footpath from the school property to the proposed open space area. Mr. Frederick noted that all buyers are required to sign a statement acknowledging the existence and requirements of the conservation easement. He provided a copy to all members present. A motion was made by Agent Olsen and seconded by Agent Storey to continue IW 368 to the Agency's next meeting, scheduled for March 19, 2002. Vote was 6-0-0.
" IW 369, Application of The Town of Enfield for regulated activities associated with ROAD 2000 - Section 10, drainage improvements and road reconstruction of Cooper Street. [Submitted Feb. 12, Rec/ed Feb. 19, PPE Mar.5, MAD Apr. 25, SLMAD Jun. 29, 2002] Mr. Board, Town Engineer, briefly reviewed changes made to the Cooper Street plans. The proposed swale has a 3 foot bottom with 2:1 side slopes, 18 inches in depth. The proposed swale would act as a filter, with rip rap to stabilize the water. Agent Szewczak expressed concern that the swale would not be armored in any way. Mr. Bord stated that matting would be in place until grass took over. He also explained that the last section of 15 inch pipe is at a flatter slope to help dissipate some of the energy within the manhole. After deciding that use of concrete paving blocks is not a feasible alternative, members asked that rip rap be placed on the bottom of the swale, with grass and matting on the sides. Mr. Northrup suggested the use of a tough, non-biodegradable type matting. A motion was made by Agent Storey and seconded by Agent Szewczak to continue IW 369 until the next meeting, March 19, 2002. Vote was 6-0-0.
" IW 370, Application of David S. Flasinski for regulated activities associate with the removal of an existing residential structure and replacement with a new residential and garage structure, located at 9 Manning Road. [Submitted Feb. 13, Rec/ed Feb. 19, PPE Mar.5, MAD Apr. 25, SLMAD Jun. 29, 2002] Mr. Ken Pudeler and Mr. David Flasinski reviewed the proposed plans. The applicant is limited in his use of the 7 acre parcel because of extensive wetlands. The Applicant represented that the septic system, currently located between the present house and large tree west of the house, must be maintained until the garage is complete, since the applicant intends to remain there until then. The new home will be connected to the town's sewer system with the aid of a pump. Mr. Flasinski wishes to start the project as soon as possible, with completion of the house and garage within a year. He will remove the sheds from the wetlands once the new house is complete. He is also considering a slight change in the size of the house or garage. Mr. Pudeler noted that all work will be done outside of the wetlands. A modular home is planned. There is a drainage pipe coming off the Town road. The Applicant's Engineer could not find any easements held by the Town. The property owner thought it might have been extended beyond the road right of way by the previous landowner. The drainage pipe is another physical obstacle in the location of the house. Mr. Pudeler did not provide photographs of the property as requested by the Agency at the last meeting. After reviewing Planning & Zoning Regulations, Mr. Northrup noted that accessory buildings must be at least 5' from the rear & side yards. He also cautioned that because the principal building is being removed, Mr. Flasinski may find himself in conflict with the Regulations, which state that the principal building must be in place. He encouraged the applicant to meet with the Town Planner regarding this matter. Mr. Pudeler stated that the applicant does not wish to relocate the original proposed location of the garage due to the current septic location and screening issues. After discussion, a motion was made by Agent Olsen to continue IW 370 until the meeting of March 19, 2002. Seconded by Agent Sarno. Vote was 6-0-0.
9. New Business
" IW 371, Application of The Slanetz Corporation for regulated activities associated with relocation of catchbasin and general maintenance of property and building, located at 178 North Maple Street. [Submitted Feb. 28, Rec'ed Mar. 5, PPE Mar. 19, May 9, SLMAD Jul.13, 2002] Don Slanetz and Karen LaPlante reviewed plans to excavate along their building to waterproof the foundation, and also regrade a slope area and install cloth and 2" stone. The area would also be cleaned of debris. Mrs. LaPlante noted that the area is ledge. Mr. Slanetz is also proposing to relocate a catch basin to catch drainage from North Maple Street. After discussion, it was the consensus that the site would be improved by the proposed work. Since a decision cannot be made until the 19th, a motion was made by Agent Storey, seconded by Agent Sarno, to continue IW 371 until March 19, 2002. Vote was 6-0-0.
" Discuss Modifications to Bylaws After review of the most recent revisions provided by Mr. Northrup, a motion was made by Agent Bergamini, seconded by Agent Storey, and voted unanimously to accept the bylaws dated March 5, 2002 as presented.
" Next meeting will be March 19, 2002 in the Council Chambers.
10. Adjourn A motion was made by Agent Storey and seconded by Agent Sarno to adjourn the meeting at 10:56 p.m.
Acronym Key for Dates:
Submitted = Day it was Logged in by the Appropriate Town Office.
Rec'ed = Received (First Regular Meeting or 35 Days After Submission)
PPE = Petition Period Ends (14 Days from Receipt)
MAD = Mandatory Action Date (65 Days from Receipt)
EMAD = Extended Mandatory Action Date (Any combination up to 65 days from original MAD)
SLMAD = Statutory Limit of Mandatory Action Date (130th Day from Receipt of Application)
MPHCD = Mandatory Public Hearing Closing Date (45 Days from opening of the public hearing)
EMPHCD = Extended Mandatory Public Hearing Closing Date (Any combination up to 45 Days from first MPHCD)
MPHAD = Mandatory Public Hearing Action Date (35 Days after close of the public hearing)
EMPHAD = Extended Mandatory Public Hearing Action Date (Any combination up to 35 Days from first MPHAD)
SLMPHCD = Statutory Limit of Mandatory Public Hearing Closing Date (90th Day from Opening of Public Hearing)
SLMPHAD = Statutory Limit of Mandatory Public Hearing Action Date (35 days after SLPHCD |
|
Last Modified: 1/21/2005 4:13:31 AM
|
|
|