|
Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Meeting
INLAND WETLANDS AND WATERCOURSES AGENCY
MINUTES OF A PUBLIC HEARING and REGULAR MEETING
TUESDAY, July 6, 2004
A Public hearing and Regular Meeting of the Enfield Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Agency were held on Tuesday, July 6, 2004 in the Enfield Room, Enfield Town Hall, 820 Enfield Street, Enfield, Connecticut. Chairperson Gretchen Pfeifer-Hall called the Public Hearing to order at 7:30 p.m.
PRESENT: Gretchen Pfeifer-Hall, Chairperson
Frank Poirot
E. Patrick Storey
Richard Szewczak (8:17 p.m.)
Louis V. Tallarita
David J. Wawer, Alternate (7:57 p.m.)
ABSENT: Michael Mosschetti
Joseph Jedynak
ALSO PRESENT: Neil Angus, Wetlands Agent
Susan Berube, Recording Secretary
PUBLIC HEARING(S)
1. Call to Order:
The meeting was called to order by Chairperson Pfeifer-Hall at 7:30 p.m.
2. Pledge Allegiance to the Flag:
There was not a flag in the room, so the pledge was not given.
3. Roll Call:
Present were: Chairperson Gretchen Pfeifer-Hall and Agents Poirot, Storey, Tallarita, and Wawer (7:57 p.m.). Upon Agent Wawer's arrival, he was seated as a full voting member for the public hearing.
Also present were Neil Angus, Wetlands Agent and Susan Berube, Recording Secretary.
IW#413 of Mass Mutual Life Insurance Company for a proposed above-ground parking garage, parking lot expansion, heli-pad and associated grading and drainage improvements within 100 feet of wetlands and watercourses. Property located at 100 Brightmeadow Blvd. (Map 35 Lot 220); Zoned BR [Submitted May 12, 2004; Received May 18, 2004; PPE June 1, 2004; MPHCD July 6, 2004].
Susan Hayes of Updike, Kelly & Spellacy, Steve O'Neill of VHB, and Dean Gustafson, soil scientist reviewed updated plans with the Agency members.
Ms. Hayes felt that most of the comments from the previous IWWA meeting, as well as more recent comments from Staff, have been addressed.
Mr. O'Neill reviewed each item of concern as stated in his memo of June 25, 2004 to the Town. He explained that the vortechnic units were replaced with off line baffle systems because of design changes.
He continued by stated that the baffle system will provide the required 80% remediation by directing the water through the system by way of catch basins, draining into a detention basin for filtering near Wetland #2 before finally exiting.
Removal of 33 proposed parking spaces also removed the need for a vortechnic unit in that area.
He noted that a previous application had been approved by the Agency to clean out contaminated sediment from wetland #2 and catch basins. The current applicant also proposes to remove identified invasives within Wetland #2 on an ongoing basis.
Also, the plans have been corrected to read that the buffer is actually 30', not 130'.
Mr. O'Neill also explained that Mr. Angus had suggested a bio-filtration system in the 84 parking space area, however, there is not adequate room. Instead, an on-line sediment chamber for additional cleansing has been added and a secondary, existing baffle chamber is at the discharge site. The same type of system will be used for the south east parking area, which drains into wetland #3.
Mr. O'Neill went on to explain that the revised plans show that all drainage of the helipad will go into the fire-lane. The existing slope behind the helipad is 2 ½:1 and will be cut back to 5:1 for less erosion and to address the concerns for the escarpment slope.
An erosion control seed mix will be planted.
The maintenance plan now names the responsible party for maintenance, that being MassMutual.
Also named on the plans are the invasive species to be removed.
The construction sequence has been revised to show more detail as well as additional erosion control measures.
It had been suggested that the detention basin be moved more northward, however, because of the elevations and locations of the baffle system, this is not possible without affecting the wetlands.
Also, the erosion and sediment control locations mirror the actual limits of disturbance.
Members briefly reviewed Mr. Cabibbo's memorandum regarding engineering issues.
Mr. Angus's written comments dated July 6, 2004 were also reviewed.
Mr. O'Neill stated that the stockpiles located within the 100' review area are temporary only and no building materials or equipment will be stored in that area.
Mr. O'Neill stated also that the baffle entering into Wetland #3 is overflowing and the applicant plans to begin a long term maintenance plan on it instead of remediation as that would create more of a disturbance.
Agent Storey asked if the identified invasive species are located elsewhere on the site.
Mr. Gustafson stated that the majority are located in Wetland #2, although there is a small phragmite community in Wetland #3.
The community in Wetland #2 is widespread enough to have an effect on wildlife and the function and values of the wetland. He continued on to say that phragmites are intolerant of shade and this would make it unlikely for it to spread further in other areas of Wetland #1 or #3 because those areas are well shaded.
Agent Storey asked if Mr. Angus's proposed condition #11 should have a time frame included since there will be more sediment entering during construction.
Mr. Angus replied that the idea behind the condition was to have the cleaning done in the beginning because the existing baffle system is not functioning. The maintenance plan calls for regular cleaning to begin after construction.
He continued on to say that removal of sediments from wetland #3 would be in a well vegetated area and would require removal of mature trees, creating more disturbance than the sediment removal is worth. This would also clear the area of shade, making it more conducive to invasives.
Mr. Angus also added that in response to concerns of members at the last meeting, he spoke with Mr. Cabbibo regarding possible misunderstanding that the vortechnic units have been removed from the plans. Mr. Cabbibo confirmed that he was aware of this and all of his engineering concerns, except for the inner workings of the garage have been addressed. (Agent Wawer arrived and was seated as a full voting member at this time).
At this time, the meeting was opened for public comment. No one in the audience came forward to speak.
Ms. Hayes thanked Mr. Angus and Mr. Cabbibo for all of their assistance on this application and feels that the proposed plans fully comply with the regulations and there will be no negative environmental impact, and the proposal actually will improve some areas of the site. The applicant has also shown there are no feasible and prudent alternatives.
A motion was made by Agent Poirot and seconded by Agent Storey to close the public hearing. Vote was 5-0-0.
A motion was made by Agent Storey and seconded by Agent Tallarita to close the public hearing portion of the meeting at 8:04 p.m. Vote was 5-0-0.
REGULAR MEETING
1. Call to Order:
The regular meeting was called to order by Chairperson Pfeifer-Hall at 8:05 p.m.
2. Roll Call:
Present were: Chairperson Gretchen Pfeifer-Hall and Agents Poirot, Storey, Tallarita, Wawer, and Szewczak (8:17 p.m.) Also present were Neil Angus, Wetlands Agent and Susan Berube, Recording Secretary.
Agent Wawer was seated as a full voting member for the remainder of the meeting.
At this time, a motion was made by Agent Storey and seconded by Agent Wawer to change the order of the agenda by moving first to Minutes Approval and then move to Old Business and then New Business before returning to the remaining agenda items. Vote was 5-0-0.
8. Approval of Minutes -- June 15, 2004 Meeting:
After brief review, a motion was made by Agent Storey and seconded by Agent Tallarita to approve the minutes of the meeting of June 15, 2004 with the following correction: page 3, 2nd paragraph, 1st sentence, change "land" to "lane". Vote was 5-0-0.
10. Old Business
IW#413 of Mass Mutual Life Insurance Company for a proposed above-ground parking garage, parking lot expansion, heli-pad and associated grading and drainage improvements within 100 feet of wetlands and watercourses. Property located at 100 Brightmeadow Blvd. (Map 35 Lot 220); Zoned BR [Submitted May 12, 2004; Received May 18, 2004; PPE June 1, 2004; MPHCD July 6, 2004; MAD September 9, 2004]:
Agent Poirot noted that some of the earlier alternatives presented to the Agency or at least discussed with Staff would have resulted in greater impact, such as using all surface parking.
He feels that the parking garage is a sound alternative and the applicant has demonstrated a willingness to mitigate the impacts.
Agent Storey agreed and noted that there was no other practical way the project could have been accomplished.
At this time, Chairperson Pfeifer-Hall suggested that Agent Wawer abstain from voting on this application due to his late arrival.
Mr. Angus added that because Agent Wawer was not present to participate for the entire public hearing this evening, he should abstain for procedural purposes.
Members discussed the proposed conditions of approval.
Agent Storey recommended that condition #11 be slightly modified to state that the baffle particle separator be cleaned prior to the start of construction.
Chairperson Pfeifer-Hall verified that the latest set of plans are dated June 25, 2004 and agreed with the comments of the other agents, stating that the applicant presented thorough plans and addressed all of the Agency members' concerns.
A motion was made by Agent Storey and seconded by Agent Poirot to approve IW# 413 with the standard 10 conditions in addition to the following:
11. Existing baffle particle separator is to be cleaned of all sediment and debris prior to the start of construction. If any portion of the system is not functioning properly, it must be repaired or replaced. In addition, all existing catch basins must be cleaned of all sediment and debris;
12. Any disturbed areas beyond the rip-rap detention basin outlet areas are to be reinforced with a native pre-seeded straw-hay/mulch jute netting mat or acceptable alternative to aid in erosion control in the upland review area;
13. The Wetlands Agent will not sign off on the certificate of occupancy until all disturbed areas are temporarily and/or permanently stabilized;
14. Snow Stockpiling areas or non-stockpiling areas must be clearly defined and signed. These areas must be identified on a plan and be provided to the snow removal contractor;
15. All Engineering comments and concerns must be addressed prior the issuance of a building permit;
16. Exposed detention areas must be completely covered with a wetland and/or conservation seed mixture and properly stabilized encourage quick regeneration and limit potential for invasive species from invading and dominating the detention facility.
17. All disturbed areas must be continually monitored and all stockpiled materials must be temporarily stabilized in order to prevent and erosion and sedimentation during construction. Dust control on-site shall be in accordance with Section 5-2-12 of the 2002 Connecticut Guidelines for Soil Erosion and Sediment Control;
18. The permittee shall remove Invasive Plant species from wetland #2 as per the approved long-term maintenance plan. Removal methods shall be those approved / recommended by the Department of Environmental Protection and/or the Connecticut Agricultural Experimental Station. In order to successfully eliminate this vegetation the process may need to be repeated in sequential years;
19. With the exception of the additional items stated in these conditions, this application is approved in accordance with Site Plans entitled "Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company, 100 Brightmeadow Blvd., Enfield, CT 06082"; sheets C-1 through C21, H-1, Sv-1 through Sv-8, Ph-1 through Ph-3; dated 5/12/04, revised through 6/25/04; prepared by VHB, Inc.;. Any changes that would potentially cause greater impact to wetlands or watercourses, such as enlargement or reorientation of structure footprints, from the plans and any denial or changes made by any other regulatory agency or commission shall require the permitee to come before the Enfield Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Agency for a Permit Modification or Determination of Permit Need (Jurisdictional Ruling).
Vote was 4-0-1 (Wawer) Reason for approval was that the project, with mitigation, will not adversely affect wetlands and watercourses and the applicant has presented this proposal as the most feasible and prudent alternative.
11. New Business
IW#416 of Retail Brand Alliance, Inc. for a proposed walkway/fire lane and retaining wall involving excavation, regrading, filling and paving within 100 feet of wetlands and watercourses. Property located at 100 Phoenix Avenue (Map 46 Lot 1); Zoned I-1; [Submitted June 18, 2004, 2004; Received July 6, 2004; PPE July 20, 2004; MAD, September 9, 2004]:
At this time, Agent Szewczak joined the meeting (8:17 p.m.).
Henry Withers of CR3 Landscaping represented the applicant. He presented proposed plans and explained that the site is at the corner of South Road and Phoenix Avenue.
The applicant was previously before the Agency to allow relocation of the fire lane and install a patio area for use by employees.
The current application is to enclose the patio area from South Road and incorporate the fire lane for employee use. He is proposing a low retaining wall with plantings and an evergreen screen.
This will require moving the fire lane to within the 100' upland review area. It would require .48 acre disturbance in addition to the 1.7 acres of disturbance previously approved.
The ponds on the site are manmade and the new disturbance will remain within the currently mowed area.
The fire lane would be graded to meet existing grades in order to maintain overland flow. Part of it would be paved but crushed stone and grass pavers would also be used to complete the required 16' width.
A silt fence will be erected at the limits of disturbance. The area beyond the proposed retaining wall would be gradually graded to meet existing grade.
Numerous plantings would be made, including trees, shrubs, and perennials. Most of these plantings would take place outside of the regulated area.
The impervious surface ratio is currently 29.5%. This would increase by .64% to 30.14%.
Agent Szewczak noted that the west detention basin is full of silt and phragmites and asked if the applicant would consider cleaning out the silt and removing the phragmites to enhance the wetlands.
Mr. Withers agreed that it could be considered and is hoping for a quick approval for the fire lane from the Agency in order to meet with the Planning & Zoning Commission as soon as possible.
Mr. Angus asked if the other two ponds are also full of silt.
Mr. Withers replied that the other two ponds are in better shape.
Mr. Angus noted that cleaning out the west pond would change the scope of the application and the Agency would have to determine if a public hearing is warranted.
Chairperson Pfeifer-Hall asked if this could be considered a maintenance item.
Mr. Angus agreed that it could. He also stated that the applicant could add it to the current application or return to the Agency for a Modification of Plans in the future.
Mr. Withers will speak to the applicant prior to the Agency's next meeting, July 20, 2004.
Agent Storey agreed that it is wise to clean up the pond and asked how the new trees would be planted.
Mr. Withers stated they would be 6' minimum in height and nothing larger than a bobcat would be used to facilitate the planting.
The project would start as soon as approvals are received and the applicant would like to have the fire lane done within one month. The plantings would be done when the stone retaining wall is finished, and into the fall. Some of the proposed work area is already open due to previously approved work.
Agent Tallarita asked if there is a deadline for the fire lane to be completed.
Mr. Withers responded that the fire department has been cooperating on this matter as they know that the applicant is working on required approvals.
Chairperson Pfeifer-Hall asked if the trees around the pond will be planted in mulch.
Mr. Withers answered that the trees around the pond will not be mulched. The area is in a natural vegetative state now and will remain so. It will not be mowed.
Mr. Angus asked if the applicant has considered using stone and grass pavers for the entire length of the fire lane. It is currently planned to be a 16' width of pavement with stone shoulders.
Mr. Withers stated that the fire chief is reluctant to have all of it in stone and pavers because of vehicle stability issues and also because the fire lane needs to be plowed in winter and the pavers could be damaged by the plow.
A motion was made by Agent Szewczak and seconded by Agent Storey to continue IW #416 until the meeting of July 20, 2004. This application is not considered a significant impact activity and no public hearing is necessary. Vote was 6-0-0.
IW#417 of Turf Products Corp. for a proposed 38,920 square foot warehouse facility, associated parking and drainage improvements within 100 feet of wetlands and watercourses. Property located at 173 Moody Road (Map 93 Lot 12); Zoned I-1; [Submitted June 30, 2004, 2004; Received July 6, 2004; PPE July 20, 2004; MAD, September 9, 2004]:
Dana Steele of J. R. Russo & Associates represented the applicant, stating that one of the owners, Mark Zetoojian, was unavailable to attend this meeting.
He explained that the existing facility is located adjacent to the west of the subject parcel. The subject parcel is 33.8 acres.
The parcel is currently in agricultural use. Located on the north side of Moody Road, it has numerous farm outbuildings and greenhouses.
Mr. Steele reviewed the site plan with Agency members. He noted that some of the existing buildings are located within the 100' upland review area. The rear of the property will remain in agricultural use. Only the front portion of the property is being developed.
The site plan shows the proposed parking and new building. The building will be 38,920 square feet and will be 37' high with a loading dock on the north (rear) side with room for a truck turnaround. The parking area will have a catch basin and bypass structure system to maximize sediment control as well as a detention basin.
Mr. Steele noted that there was an application for parking and a detention pond on this site, approved in 2002. The applicant looked at several options for keeping the parking and building out of the wetlands and regulated areas as much as possible. Turning the building to have the docks on the side was also considered, as well as the possibility of making the building higher.
The applicant feels that the current proposal is the best. It includes catch basin sumps and detention for filtering before discharging drainage into the town's system. This plan is essentially the same as approved in 2002 except that it now includes a building on the site. The parking has been removed from the front of the building in order to keep enough room for the trucks to get in without encroaching on the 100' upland review area. There will be no disturbance to the wetlands.
The applicant is awaiting approval of the detention pond location from the Town Engineer.
Agent Storey asked how the areas where buildings will be removed will be treated.
Mr. Steele explained that the areas that once had buildings, will be paved for parking or used for the building area.
Agent Storey also asked how future access to the rear portion of the property would be maintained without potential damage to the wetlands. The parcel could be developed at some future date.
Mr. Steele will provide further information at the next meeting, July 20, 2004.
Agent Storey asked if there would be enough riprap at the discharge point where the town drainage enters the watercourse.
Mr. Angus stated that the Town Engineer's office is still reviewing the application - there would have to be enough capacity in the existing drainage pipes to accommodate these additional flows. Ideally, if the pipe can accommodate the flow, the outlet stabilization should be sufficient for the maximum volume the pipe can discharge. If there is not enough rip rap, the applicant could be required to add more.
Agent Szewczak expressed concern over the emergency spillway which empties directly into the wetlands. He asked if this should have erosion control measures as well.
Mr. Steele stated that the detention basin is designed to exceed the 100 year storm event requirements but he will provide additional erosion control measures if required. The intent is not to intrude on the wetlands.
Agent Szewczak suggested starting the armored area sooner, prior to entering the wetlands.
Mr. Steele stated that the design is standard for spillways, to protect new soils that are not yet established.
Agent Szewczak asked what the existing out building is used for. Mr. Steele believes it is for storage of business equipment and files. He is unsure if it is also used for farm equipment storage.
Agent Szewczak expressed concern over the potential for greater activity at the storage building, creating a possibility of leakage from vehicles, especially since the gravel lot is pitched toward the wetlands.
Mr. Steele offered to re-grade the lot and create a different drainage system. He will provide some options at the Agency's next meeting, July 20, 2004. He added that the existing house will remain as a caretaker's residence.
Agent Szewczak suggested that something other than the proposed White Pine buffer would be appropriate.
Mr. Steele stated that he felt this type of tree would be beneficial as a visual screen. He will have the wetland scientist provide input on this.
Chairperson Pfeifer-Hall asked Mr. Angus to provide information on the differences between the current application and the previously approved application for this site.
She was especially concerned with the effect of the newly proposed outlet into the Town's drainage system and emergency spillway.
Mr. Angus noted that the basin is in relatively the same location with one discharge into wetlands eliminated by instead connecting to the Town's drainage system. This still is under review by the Town Engineer's office.
Chairperson Pfeifer-Hall also asked that something more compatible with wetlands be used, other than the proposed white pine.
Agent Storey asked where the Soil Scientist report is. The application is incomplete without it.
Mr. Steele will request a copy from Mr. Ianni, the soil scientist.
Mr. Angus recommended that an updated report be provided because of changes in the plan. The previous report is on file with the last application for this site.
A motion was made by Agent Storey and seconded by Agent Tallarita to table further discussion on this application until the meeting of July 20, 2004. There is currently not enough information available to determine whether or not a public hearing is necessary. Vote was 6-0-0.
IW#418 of Troiano Professional Center, LLC for a proposed 18,400 square foot commercial building, associated parking and drainage improvements within 100 feet of wetlands and watercourses. Property located at 841, 851, 867 Enfield Street (Map 26 Lots 21, 22 and 23); Zoned B-L; [Submitted June 30, 2004, 2004; Received July 6, 2004; PPE July 20, 2004; MAD, September 9, 2004]:
Mr. Dave Ziaks of Hesketh and Associates represented the applicant. He explained that the site is located at the corner of Enfield and Elm Streets. It is currently two lots and held 3 residential homes until they were recently removed. The 1.33 acre site has been cleared except for a few trees. It is zoned Business Local.
The applicant proposes to build a 2 story colonial style building for Enfield Federal Savings & Loan and will face Enfield Street. It will have 4 drive-through lanes and one driveway cut from both Enfield Street and Elm Street.
A new sidewalk will be installed on Enfield Street to meet the existing sidewalk on Elm Street. Sixty seven parking spaces are planned, meeting the minimum Planning & Zoning Regulation requirements.
The site is allowed 66% impervious coverage; 65% is planned.
There are no wetlands actually on the property. The wetland is actually an intermittent stream located to the north and eventually ties in to the drainage system on Enfield Street and ends in Freshwater Brook.
Earlier plans had shown parking planned in the regulated area, in the northeast section of the site.
The north east and easterly portions drain to the north east.
1/3 of the site drains (along Elm Street) overland to a catch basin on Elm Street/Enfield Street corner.
The remaining 1/3 drains overland to Enfield Street.
The drainage system and grading balance the flows equally into all three areas to match existing conditions.
The roof drainage will be put into an underground storage and filtration system. Calculations have been provided to Staff for review.
A storm water separator will be used for all paved surfaces.
The limits of clearing follow the limits of the pavement.
A small dumpster, maple tree and screening will be located in the north east area of the lot.
The site is served by public water and sewer.
Agent Szewczak discussed the possibility of holding a public hearing for this application. Also, he would like to see a detail of the drainage, especially because of use of the full amount of allowable impervious surface coverage.
Agent Storey agreed that the application may be a significant interest, but not due to wetlands impact since that looks to be minimal.
Agents Wawer, Tallarita, and Poirot agreed.
Chairperson Pfeifer-Hall asked for further information on the proposed interceptor and added that she feels the proposed location of dumpster is inappropriate.
Agent Storey also would like additional information on the storm water system.
Mr. Ziaks stated that the interceptor is usually used more for roof systems, not parking areas but this site has no surface detention and a very small parking lot.
Agent Szewczak asked where snow storage is proposed and if there is any concern over basement leakage given the underground roof leader storage/groundwater recharge proposal.
Mr. Ziaks responded that he expects to have the Town Engineer's comments by the Agency's next meeting on July 20, 2004.
Only 1/3 of the 6/10th of an acre coverage will go into the underground storage system. Also, the design will have to meet state standards.
In response to a question by Chairperson Pfeifer-Hall, Mr. Ziaks stated that the drainage ditch has a flared end and rip rap will be installed just prior to the entrance of the wetland. It is a 12" diameter pipe and the applicant has permission to enter and an option to purchase that portion of the abutting property. He did not want to disturb the wooded area and that is where the drainage currently flows.
Mr. Angus noted that water quality needs to be addressed.
Also, the flagged wetland is an actual wetland with an intermittent stream running through it. A soil scientist's report is needed.
Also, the drainage report does not have a written narrative to explain how the whole operation functions.
Mr. Angus also requested information on how the storm scepters will renovate the water to reduce impact to the wetlands.
Mr. Ziaks responded that the system meets the D.E.P.'s requirements but that he will provide documentation to the Agency.
A motion to table IW #418 until the meeting of July 20, 2004 was made by Agent Storey and seconded by Agent Poirot. Vote was 5-0-1 (Szewczak)
IW#419 of Michael and Farrah Schultz for clear-cutting and re-stabilization of land within 100 feet of wetlands and watercourses. Property located at 38 Abbe Road (Map 102 Lot 99): Zoned R-44; [Submitted July 2, 2004, 2004; Received July 6, 2004; PPE July 20, 2004; MAD, September 9, 2004]:
Michael and Farrah Shultz represented the applicants. Mr. Schultz explained that he did not "clear cut" in his opinion.
The builder was supposed to remove some metal debris and trees, but did not do as promised.
Mr. Shultz provided photos of the area. The area in question is 318 square feet. He removed three standing dead trees and three that were already down and uprooted.
He reviewed his proposed plan with the Agency members.
He will be re-planting 11 trees and leaving the stumps of those that were removed so as to not disturb the area any further. He stated that he was not informed of the limitations of the property use.
Agent Poirot noted that the conditions on the developments are supposed to be communicated from the builder to the eventual owners.
Mr. Shultz stated that he was confused over the deed's notation of a 25% slope where the lot is in fact, flat.
During discussion of what constitutes clear cutting, Mr. Angus noted that the homeowner's actions technically meets the IWWA's definition of clear cutting.
Members held further discussion regarding the developer's responsibility to relay property limitations and requirements to purchasers.
Mr. Angus noted that it is a legal issue between the developer and the owner.
The clear cutting occurred within the 100' upland review area.
There is a question as to whether or not there is escarpment soil present because the area was not clearly flagged by the soil scientist.
The conservation easement markers are installed and the owner did not cross the boundary.
One of the conditions of approval for this lot was to limit clearing to within 100' from the road, which was less than the original limits of clearing.
In order for the applicant to correct the violation, he needs to propose plantings that are tolerant of the site conditions, along with an appropriate seed mix. He added that this lot had numerous conditions to lessen the impact on wetlands.
Mr. Schultz stated that he was told by his landscaper that the proposed trees will root themselves into the land for stabilization.
Members discussed the term "professional landscaper".
Mr. Angus recommended that the NRCS be consulted regarding appropriate plantings.
Agent Storey asked the proposed timing of the re-planting project.
Mr. Schultz stated that he plans to do the work himself, hopefully within the next month. A mulch bed is planned to be planted with shrubs and other plantings.
Mr. Angus noted that a mulch bed will absorb water but must be maintained. He again recommended that the NRCS be consulted. He also requested that the owners extend the silt fence and hay bales until the planting project is complete.
After further discussion, it was agreed that Mr. Angus would work with the owners of the property to contact the NRCS.
After brief review of Mr. Angus's warning letter and deed for this property, Mr. Angus offered to provide the original conditions of approval of development for members at the next meeting, July 20, 2004.
A motion was made by Agent Storey and seconded by Agent Poirot to table further discussion on IW #419 until the meeting of July 20, 2004. Vote was 6-0-0.
3. Executive Session - Matters regarding specific employees, pending litigation, acquisition of real estate and / or matters exempt from disclosure requirements, as needed. The specific reason should be stated for each session.
There were no items for discussion in Executive Session.
4. Public Participation - Issues of concern not on the agenda.:
No one in the audience came forward to speak.
5. Correspondence:
Correspondence was as follows:
" Authorized Agent Permit from Mr. Angus, dated June 23, 2004 to Narain Bhoj for placement of 2 sheds within 100' of wetlands at 65 Post Road. Mr. Angus noted that an abutting owner received a DPN from the Agency prior to the Authorized Agent Permit process being available. This applicant was given the choice of going through the DPN process or the Authorized Agent Process.
" Certified letter from Mr. Angus, dated June 23, 2004 regarding clear-cutting within a regulated area at 38 Abbe Road and is included on this evening's agenda;
" copy of deed for 38 Abbe Road; article on recent court decisions impacting Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Agencies;
" article regarding property seller's responsibilities to notify buyers of problems of the property;
" copy of 2004/05 CACIWC membership application;
" copy of letter from D.E.P. to Michael Harrilchack, dated June 15, 2004 regarding Autumn Fields development. A request for modification application is expected soon.
7. Commissioner's Correspondence:
Chairperson Pfeifer-Hall received notification of her re-appointment to the Agency for 4 years.
8. Wetlands Agent Report - June 10, 2004 through June 30, 2004:
As most items were part of the agenda, this item was only briefly reviewed. No discussion.
12. Other Business
Legal Procedure review follow-up discussion:
No discussion. Item to be removed from future agendas unless necessary.
o Next regular meeting will be Tuesday, July 20, 2004 at 7:00 PM in the Council Chambers.
13. Adjourn
A motion was made by Agent Storey and seconded by Agent Tallarita to adjourn the meeting at 10:34 p.m. Vote was 6-0-0.
Respectfully Submitted,
______________________________
Frank Poirot, Secretary
Last Updated: Friday, Aug 06, 2004 |