|
Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Meeting
INLAND WETLANDS AND WATERCOURSES AGENCY
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
TUESDAY, MAY 18, 2004
A Regular Meeting of the Enfield Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Agency was held on Tuesday, May 18, 2004 in the Enfield Room, Enfield Town Hall, 820 Enfield Street, Enfield, Connecticut. Chairperson Gretchen Pfeifer-Hall called the meeting to order at 7:01 p.m.
PRESENT: Gretchen Pfeifer-Hall, Chairperson
Joseph Jedynak
Frank Poirot
E. Patrick Storey
Richard Szewczak
Louis V. Tallarita
David J. Wawer, Alternate (7:02 p.m.)
ABSENT: Michael Mosschetti
ALSO PRESENT: Neil Angus, Wetlands Agent
Susan Berube, Recording Secretary
PUBLIC HEARING(S)
1. Hearings: None.
REGULAR MEETING
1. Call to Order:
The meeting was called to order by Chairperson Pfeifer-Hall at 7:01 p.m.
2. Pledge Allegiance to the Flag
3. Roll Call:
Present were: Chairperson Pfeifer-Hall and Agents Moschetti, Poirot, Storey, Szewczak, Tallarita, and Wawer. Also present were Neil Angus, Wetlands Agent, and Susan Berube, Recording Secretary.
4. Executive Session - Matters regarding specific employees, pending litigation, acquisition of real estate and / or matters exempt from disclosure requirements, as needed. The specific reason should be stated for each session.
There were no items for discussion in executive session.
5. Public Participation - Issues of concern not on the agenda:
No one in the audience came forward to speak.
6. Correspondence:
Items of correspondence were as follows:
" copy of amendment to the Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Act;
" Warning letter dated 4/29/04 from Mr. Angus to Nuger Realty Limited Partnership regarding refuse in wetlands at 841 Enfield Street; Mr. Angus will inspect the site later this week;
" letter dated 5/10/04 from Mr. Angus to Linda Ronin, owner of 809 Enfield Street regarding discharge of wastewater into wetlands;
" letter dated 5/10/04 from Mr. Angus to Mr. & Mrs. Ferreira regarding above ground pool near escarpment soil at 10 Strawberry Lane; Mr. Angus will follow up on making sure wood chips placed on the slope and in the wetlands have been removed.
" Approval of technical plan revision for Road 2000 program - Section 7, dated 5/10/04 from Connecticut D.E.P. to Maquire Group, Inc.;
" letter dated 5/11/04 from Mr. Angus to Mr. and Mrs. Wall regarding building permit for a shed at 11 Sharp Street;
" letter from Mr. Angus, dated 5/11/04 to Jody & Peter Savage of 4 Patricia Circle regarding proposed in ground pool near an escarpment soil slope;
" letter from Mr. Angus to Carl Gates of 2 Light Street, dated 5/4/04 regarding a proposed above-ground pool and required distance from toe of slope;
" copy of 5/2/04 Hartford Courant article regarding wetlands.
7. Commissioner's Correspondence:
Agent Poirot reported that he obtained a copy of FEMA flood plain maps for Enfield. These are scaled at 1"=400'.
Also, his contact at the D.E.P. offered to come before the IWWA at some future date to discuss flood related issues.
Chairperson Pfeifer-Hall read a thank-you note from Mrs. Olsen regarding the tree dedication ceremony in memory of her husband, Roger Olsen.
Also, Chairperson Pfeifer-Hall announced that the Conservation Commission members will be taking part in the DEP Wadeable Streams Program in October, 2004. IWWA members are welcome and encouraged to take part.
8. Approval of Minutes -- May 4, 2004 Meeting:
After brief review, a motion was made by Agent Storey and seconded by Agent Tallarita to approve the minutes of the meeting of May 4, 2004 with the following amendments: page 3, 10th paragraph, second line, after "entrance" add: "of ATV's and dirt bikes"; 1st page, 1st paragraph, change date from "May 6" to "May 4". Vote was 6-0-1(Jedynak).
9. Wetlands Agent Report - April 29, 2004 through May 12, 2004:
Mr. Angus briefly reviewed the Agent's Report with members.
He noted that except for lack of oil pans under the trucks, Rich's Oil Service property is in compliance.
He also stated that he met with the owner of the Weymouth Road property that received a wetlands permit last week for some selective harvesting. He anticipates that the owner will come before the Agency in the near future regarding construction of 1 house on the property. Mr. Angus encouraged the owner to coordinate with the forester and soil scientist to possibly use the future building site as the landing area for the tree cutting operation in order to minimize impact to the wetlands.
Mr. Angus also stated that the Town will be returning to the Agency for a modification of plans for Freshwater Pond;
Mr. Angus also noted that he will be meeting with the D.O.T. in the near future regarding some state fencing located in streams that is causing damming.
Mr. Angus met with some residents of Kennedy Drive regarding some water problems they are having because of development of Birch Hill. Upon investigation, Mr. Angus found that the roof leaders on houses of 2 of the 3 developed lots are not tied into the storm drain system as required. Also, some of the lots are not draining correctly. The developer will be notified and Mr. Angus will continue to work on this.
Members held some discussion regarding bonding of drainage work.
Mr. Angus explained that separate bonds are required for various departments and because they are released as various stages as the work is completed, it would be impractical to have one bond for an entire project.
In answer to a question by Agent Storey, Mr. Angus stated that development projects are reviewed on a case by case basis. Permits cannot be conditioned based on other projects being done unsatisfactorily by the developer. Enforcement issues are taken up on a case by case basis.
Mr. Angus also briefly outlined several enforcement issues that he dealt with since the last meeting. He is requesting removal of trash, debris, and/or grass clippings at 64 Palomba Drive, 841 Enfield Street, and Trioano's property on North Street.
10. Old Business
IW#411 of Judith Jackson for a proposed 16'x 32' in-ground pool and 8' patio involving excavation and regrading within 100 feet of wetlands. Property located at 70 Steele Road (Map 52 Lot 49); Zoned R-33 [Submitted April 28, 2004; Received May 4, 2004; PPE May 18, 2004; MAD July 8, 2004].
Mr. Tom Froment and Ms. Judith Jackson represented the applicant.
Mr. Froment provided a revised plan to include a retaining wall which was part of the original application but not shown on the original plans.
Mr. Angus noted that the retaining wall will help limit the need for additional grading and fill.
Mr. Froment explained that the pool will be drained, when necessary, over the lawn to allow for some treatment of the water before it enters the watercourse.
Agent Szewczak requested that the water be discharged onto the south side of the lawn, to which Mr. Froment agreed.
After further brief discussion and review of the conditions, a motion was made by Agent Szewczak and seconded by Agent Storey to approve IW#411 with the 10 standard conditions, in addition to the following:
11. All disturbed areas are to be permanently stabilized prior to removal of the erosion and sediment controls;
12. Any excess excavated material is to be removed from the site. No activity is permitted beyond the limits of the proposed silt fence;
13. Construction access is only permitted from the south side of the property;
14. All pool water discharges must be into the existing lawn area on the south side. Any direct discharge to wetlands or watercourses will constitute a violation of this permit and be subject to enforcement action;
15. With the exception of the additional items stated in these conditions, this application is approved in accordance with Site Plan entitled: Proposed In ground Pool and Patio Plan prepared for Judith A. Jackson, 70 Steele Road, Enfield, CT", dated April 27, 2004, revised 5/11/04. Any changes that would potentially cause greater impact to wetlands or watercourses, such as enlargement or reorientation of structure footprints, from the plans and any denial or changes made by any other regulatory agency or commission shall require the permitee to come before the Enfield Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Agency for a Permit Modification or Determination of Permit Need (Jurisdictional Ruling).
Vote was 7-0-0. Reason for approval was that the applicant has demonstrated that the project will not adversely affect wetlands and watercourses.
11. IW#412 of Phoenix Life Insurance Company for stormwater outfall restoration involving excavation and filling in wetlands. Property located at 100 Brightmeadow Blvd. (Map 35 Lot 220); Zoned BR [Submitted April 28, 2004; Received May 4, 2004; PPE May 18, 2004; MAD July 8, 2004].
Agent Szewczak excused himself from discussion on this application due to a potential conflict of interest.
Mr. Stanley Dynia and Mr. Derek Jones of GZA represented the applicant.
Mr. Dynia explained that he met with Staff immediately after the Agency's last meeting and has provided an addendum to address comments made by Staff. The revised plans now submitted show new limits of construction.
He briefly reviewed the proposed plan to remove sediment from the plunge pool.
He explained that the parking areas have been swept and the basins cleaned of sediment. Two of the catch basins now have hoods.
A liner will be placed in the basin area over the natural substrate.
He stated that the Stormwater Quality Management Plan has been submitted, along with information regarding the hoods.
A listing of the proposed plants has also been submitted. He added that this is an artificial wetland and the catch basins have either a low flow or are dry. He asked to start sooner than June 1 in order for Phoenix to meet environmental conditions in their agreement with MassMutual.
Agent Storey expressed surprise that the entire parking lot was not swept.
Mr. Dynia stated the portion that was swept, was done in order to meet the requirements of the sale and this application. That portion of the parking lot had to be closed for several days while the sweeping took place. The maintenance plan provides for regular cleaning and sweeping of the lot.
He added that erosion and sediment controls will be monitored and upland and conservation plantings will be made.
Mr. Angus noted that no quantities of plants were provided.
Mr. Dynia stated that the omission was a typographical error. He stated that the following would be provided: 4 white pine, 4 speckled alder, 20 iris and 20 sensitive fern. If the proposed plants are unavailable, similar plants would be substituted.
He added that the Agency may wish to monitor the plantings to make sure they survive, with a requirement that re-planting be done if more than a certain percentage of the plants die.
Mr. Dynia requested that proposed condition of approval #11 be deleted.
He also stated that any stockpiles would be held in steel, covered containers on a paved area.
In response to a question by Chairperson Pfeifer-Hall, Mr. Dynia explained that the duration of the project is scheduled to be no longer than 3 days, although it may go a bit longer in order to do all of the plantings. One day will be used for setting up, one day for excavation, and one day to clean up and re-construct the site.
He added that an engineer will be on site to oversee the erosion and sediment control installation and excavation.
The contactor will install flexible pipe to dewater the basin and drain it out over hay bales. Other alternative dewatering methods may also be used, such as pumping directly out of the catch basins.
He added that the applicant would be agreeable to whatever landscape bond amount that Staff determines.
Agency members discussed the suggested conditions of approval.
Mr. Angus suggested eliminating all but the 1st sentence of #14. New #14 would reference Attachment 6 and #15 will reference attachment 5 of the addendum submitted 5/18/04 and quantities of the plantings are as follows: 4 white pine, 4 winterberry, 4 alder, 20 iris, 20 fern, 2 lbs. New England Wetlands mix, 4 lbs. Conservation mix, and 25 lbs. Agway grass seed.
Members discussed removal of condition #11.
In response to questions by Agent Storey, Mr. Angus stated that the effect of not requiring the applicant to wait until June 1 to begin on the project would be totally dependent on the weather. As long as erosion and sediment controls are properly installed, there would likely be a minimal impact to the wetlands if there were heavy rains during the construction/excavation portion of the project.
It was the consensus of the members that in lieu of condition #11, Mr. Angus will inspect and approve all erosion and sediment control measures prior to any work being done in the plunge pool.
Also, plans are revised to May 18, 2004.
A motion was made by Agent Storey and seconded by Agent Poirot to approve IW #412 with the 10 standard conditions in addition to the following:
11. Installation of erosion and sediment controls are to be inspected by the Wetlands Agent prior to any work being done in the plunge pool;
12. To limit the amount of upland disturbance, construction access is only permitted from the west side;
13. Exposed/disturbed wetland areas must be completely covered with a wetland seed mixture to encourage quick regeneration and limit potential for invasive species from invading and dominating the created wetland area.
14. A bond, the amount to be approved by the Wetlands Agent must be posted for the approved planting/restabilization plan included in Attachment 6 of the May 18, 2004 IW#412 Addendum 1, prepared by GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc.. The bond shall not be released until all plantings have been installed and maintained for a period of one to two years (depending on the time of year the plantings are installed);
15. The maintenance plan included in Attachment 5 of the May 18, 2004 IW#412 Addendum 1, prepared by GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. is required to be implemented. This plan includes parking lot maintenance, sweeping, catch basin and plunge pool regular maintenance;
16. All disturbed areas are to be permanently stabilized prior to removal of the erosion and sediment controls. No activity is permitted beyond the limits of the proposed erosion and sediment controls;
17. No exposed excavated materials are permitted to be stored on-site;
18. With the exception of the additional items stated in these conditions, this application is approved in accordance with Site Plan entitled:" Phoenix Life Insurance Co. 100 Bright Meadow Boulevard, Enfield, CT, Proposed Activity Plan (Fig. 3) and Project details (Fig. 4)", dated April 28, 2004, revised through 5/18/04. Any changes that would potentially cause greater impact to wetlands or watercourses, such as enlargement or reorientation of structure footprints, from the plans and any denial or changes made by any other regulatory agency or commission shall require the permitee to come before the Enfield Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Agency for a Permit Modification or Determination of Permit Need (Jurisdictional Ruling).
Vote was 6-0-0 and reason for approval was that the project, with mitigation, will not adversely affect wetlands and watercourses.
Mr. Angus noted that there are statutory timeline requirements that could put the applicant at risk if they chose to commence regulated activities prior to the expiration date of the appeal period.
11. New Business
IW#413 of Mass Mutual Life Insurance Company for a proposed above-ground parking garage, parking lot expansion, heli-pad and associated grading and drainage improvements within 100 feet of wetlands and watercourses. Property located at 100 Brightmeadow Blvd. (Map 35 Lot 220); Zoned BR [Submitted May 12, 2004; Received May 18, 2004; PPE June 1, 2004; MAD, August 5, 2004].
Agent Szewczak again excused himself from discussion on this application due to a potential conflict of interest.
Ms. Susan Hayes of Updike, Spellacy & Kelly and Steve O'Neill and Danielle Idel of VHB represented the applicant.
Ms. Hayes stated that she anticipates that a public hearing will be required and thus would provide only a brief overview at this time.
Mr. O'Neill reviewed the aerial map of the site.
He stated that the existing building was built during the 1980's. The 1,175 existing parking spaces do not meet current standards of 5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of office space; only 2.5 spaces are currently provided.
Several options were considered such as expanding the parking lot and making additional spots by re-lining the lot as smaller spaces.
The proposed site expansion will increase parking by 286 spaces and an additional vortechnic unit will be provided as part of the plunge pool system that was the subject of IW#412. This will provide larger amounts of cleaner drainage into the wetlands that currently lack water.
A heli-stop and security fencing around the perimeter of the property are also being proposed. The fence would cross one intermittent stream.
A six-story parking garage is being proposed and is the most cost effective method to provide parking for future development.
Agent Storey asked if clay has been found in the proposed parking garage area. Mr. O'Neill stated that the clay goes 150' or deeper. Soil piers will be used to support the building.
In response to a question from Agent Storey, Mr. Angus stated that the concern for impact on wetlands from the parking garage would be drainage and its proximity to escarpment slopes because of a concern of the weight of the building or construction activity compromising the stability of the slopes.
Mr. O'Neill noted that stockpile from the original construction is still on site.
In response to a question by Agent Poirot, Ms. Idel stated that the impervious surface would be increased by 3% in the upland review area. The entire site will have 34% coverage, with 66% allowed.
In response to another question by Agent Poirot, Mr. O'Neill stated that the new owners had looked at other parking options such as off site parking and shuttle service but with 3,000 potential employees at this site, it would create a major impact elsewhere.
Ms. Hayes, in response to another question, stated that there will be no maintenance or repairs, except on an emergency basis, to the helicopter on this site. No fuel would be stored on site and she likened the heli-stop to a bus stop. She believed that the helicopter would be parked at Bradley Airport each night.
Ms. Idel stated, in response to concerns over the fence creating a damming effect, that except for crossing the intermittent stream, the fence would be positioned outside the wetland area, which accepts groundwater only. The stream really has little flow.
Ms. Hayes continued, in response to concerns by Agent Jedynak, that the Planning & Zoning Commission has approved flights to take place between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. , with an average of 3 flights per day and not much weekend traffic.
Mr. O'Neill stated that the parking lot is currently at 70% capacity and he expects some of the parking garage floors to be empty in the beginning. All floors will be open-air with no need for ventilation. The rear of the garage will be below grade by 4'.
Chairperson Pfeifer-Hall expressed concern over the fencing and its proximity to the forest and escarpment slopes.
Mr. O'Neill stated that the fencing was requested by the client and will not have an effect on the slopes.
Ms. Idel stated that the fencing would also separate wetland #1 from wetland #2. Wetland #2 was previously impacted by farming and has been reestablished. The habitat value of this wetland is lower than that of wetland #1 which is a tributary of Waterworks Brook. There will be no impact to the wetlands through the separation by the fence.
Chairperson Pfeifer-Hall noted that the proposal includes adding water to the wetland, but cutting off by fence to wildlife. This will need further discussion at a public hearing.
Ms. Idel also stated that the existing fence that crosses Waterworks Brook is owned by the State and restricts access to I91.
A motion was made by Agent Storey and seconded by Agent Jedynak to schedule a public hearing for IW#413 on June 1, 2004 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers due to public interest in this matter. Vote was 6-0-0.
A motion was made by Agent Wawer and seconded by Agent Storey at 9:06 p.m. to hold a short recess. Vote was 6-0-0.
Call to Order:
The meeting was called to order by Chairperson Pfeifer-Hall at 9:12 p.m.
Roll Call:
Present were: Chairperson Pfeifer-Hall and Agents Jedynak, Poirot, Storey, Szewczak, Tallarita, and Wawer. Also present were Neil Angus, Wetlands Agent, and Susan Berube, Recording Secretary. Agent Wawer was seated as a voting member for the remainder of this meeting.
IW#414 of Anocoil, Inc. for a proposed mechanical pad involving excavation within 100 feet of wetlands and watercourses. Property located at 230 Shaker Road (Map 94 Lot 8); Zoned I-1.[Submitted May 12, 2004; Received May 18, 2004; PPE June 1, 2004; MAD, August 5, 2004].
Chairperson Pfeifer-Hall excused herself from discussion on this application due to a potential conflict of interest.
Agent Szewczak acted as Chair for this application.
Mr. Dana Steele of J.R. Russo and Associates and Mr. Alan Seagrave, Jr. represented the applicant.
Mr. Steele explained that the applicant wishes to construct a mechanical unit on a concrete pad.
He noted that the unit is not an incinerator as stated on the plans. It is a thermal oxidizer. The facility has one oxidizer and this new one will work in conjunction with the existing one to improve air quality. The pad will be 52.5' x 26'.
The property is located as a rear lot off Shaker Road.
The wetlands, to the east and south sides of the property have been flagged. The pad will be located just outside of the railroad easement.
The pad needs to be located here because of the configuration of the existing thermal oxidization.
The pad will be located within 100' of the upland review area.
A berm was previously installed to act as a sound barrier for neighbors to the west. The new oxidizer will be quieter.
This project will provide an improvement to the air quality.
In response to a question by Agent Poirot, Mr. Seagraves stated that the exhaust exits through a stack. There is no condensation outside the building; it is all contained within the building. No particulate matter is emitted. This is basically a heat exchanger run by electric and natural gas. He believes there is no heat loss.
Mr. Steele noted that he has been standing next to the existing one without noticing any heat. The unit runs 24/7.
Agent Storey asked for additional information on the unit to be included in the members' next meeting packet. He asked what is in the gas that is emitted.
Mr. Seagrave responded that it is a patented process but he will provide a copy of the D.E.P. discharge permit.
Agent Storey noted that the net effect will be more noise, even if the new unit is quieter.
Mr. Steele repeated that the berm is in place and the additional noise will not have an impact on the wetlands. Members are welcome to visit the site.
In response to a question by Agent Storey, Mr. Seagrave explained that the oxidizer arrives in 3 pieces.
A small bobcat will be used to excavate for the slab and grade. Construction of the slab will be on an existing grassed area. Two pipes exit the building at the top and go into the oxidizer. The duct shown on the plans are to be removed during construction and the gas service will be relocated. The pad will not need footings.
Agent Szewczak noted that a portion of the site was determined to be within the 100 year flood plain and asked exactly where that would be.
Mr. Steele stated that the pad is at 168 and the flood plain is at 163 and outside of the limits of construction.
Members held discussion over the possible need for a public hearing but without more information on the project, could not make a determination.
A motion was made by Agent Wawer and seconded by Agent Storey to table further discussion on IW#414 until the meeting of June 1, 2004. Vote was 6-0-0.
Mr. Angus noted that a letter from a soil scientist was received and he suggested that information from the construction and emissions should be submitted to the soil scientist for his input.
Also, plans should show access and limits of disturbance and the stockpile area and stabilization features.
Also, removal of the duct needs to be shown as it is within the regulated area.
Drainage plans for pad should also be submitted.
At this time, Chairperson Pfeifer-Hall returned to the meeting.
IW#415 of 809 Enfield Street, LLC for a proposed Auto dealership involving regulated activities within 100 feet of wetlands and watercourses. Property located at 809 Enfield Street (Map 29 Lot 72); Zoned BL.[Submitted May 12, 2004; Received May 18, 2004; PPE June 1, 2004; MAD, August 5, 2004].
Mr. Dana Steele of J. R. Russo and Mr. Robert Artioli represented the applicant.
Mr. Steele explained that the applicant has the opportunity to purchase this property currently being operated as Brake King. It has been a car dealership in the past, as well as a tire dealer and is now used for brake repair.
The site has a pending application for zone change but in the interest of time, the applicant is applying to IWWA prior to any zone change.
There is a daycare to the south and open, vacant land in the rear.
The existing building takes up most of the site plus the remainder is mostly impervious surface.
It will remain a car repair facility with the addition of used and new car sales.
No site improvements other than to the façade are proposed.
A drainage ditch is located on the south side of the property but there are no wetlands located on the site.
Planning & Zoning Commission may require some improvements but the applicant anticipates that none will be within the regulated area.
There will be no painting of vehicles on site.
There are no storm drains on site. Water sheet flows to the Route 5 drainage system.
Snow storage currently is in the corners of the parking lot but not along the ditch, only on the east and north sides of the lot.
Mr. Steele added that this is actually a reduction in the intensity of use of the site.
Any car washing would take place inside the building and any spills would be remediated by written plans already available.
In response to a concern by Agent Storey, Mr. Steele agreed to confirm that floor drains are hooked into the sanitary sewer system and not into the storm drains.
If any improvements are required, the applicant will come back before the Agency.
Members held discussion as to why this application has come before the Agency at this time.
No site improvements are being proposed and there are really no issues for the Agency to act on.
Mr. Angus explained that the change of zone request is coming before the Planning & Zoning Commission and any external modifications would be within the regulated area, however, no external modifications are proposed at this time.
Chairperson Pfeifer-Hall expressed disappointment that no catch basins are proposed, especially given the proximity of the site to the Freshwater Pond, which is undergoing expensive improvements and will receive runoff from this site.
Mr. Steele explained that the lot has no low spots and surface runoff works best because of the grading of the lot. Improvements are made through the lowering intensity of use.
The existing fence along the north side will remain. No additional fencing is planned.
Members then discussed the technicalities of the application being for a full permit and not a DPN, as well as the ability of the IWWA to require improvements.
Mr. Angus noted that the Engineering department would need a detailed site plan to initiate a review, but since no improvements are proposed, there is nothing to review.
The proposed zone change will make the non-conforming use, conforming.
Withdrawal of the application was discussed and Mr. Steele asked if that were done and a future application required, if the fee would be waived.
It was the consensus of the members that it would be waived, but would have to be determined at that time.
Members agreed that the current application does not include modifying existing conditions or activities so there are no regulated activities involved at this time.
Mr. Steele presented a letter requesting withdrawal of the application because no regulated activities are associated with the change of use.
A motion was made by Agent Storey and seconded by Agent Jedynak to accept the letter presented. Vote was 6-0-1 (Pfeifer-Hall).
12. Other Business
Discussion on Proposed Regulation Amendments:
1. Map Amendments
Mr. Angus explained the difficulties in eliminating entire areas that were once wetlands because some still contain pockets of existing wetlands.
Members held discussion regarding possibly re-classifying such areas as "remnant wetlands".
Mr. Angus noted that the existing wetlands map does not show watercourses and intermittent watercourses clearly.
Agent Poirot stated that having the prior wetlands on the maps would be helpful in making decisions for both the Agency and for applicant who would be doing subsurface excavation.
It was the consensus of the members that the map be modified to show actual wetlands as well as those areas that used to be wetlands but have been filled.
Mr. Angus reminded members that the map is for advisory purposes only.
Agent Storey asked if an additional fee could be imposed on contractors that do not meet permit requirements, thereby requiring additional inspections by Staff.
Mr. Angus stated that conditions of approval could include bonding for certain types of work but bonds required by IWWA must be directly related to the regulated activities involved to keep within the Agency's jurisdiction.
o Next regular meeting will be Tuesday, June 1, 2004 at 7:00 PM in the Council Chambers (Note: the Agency will convene at 6:00 PM in the Enfield Room for dinner and an informal legal procedure review)
13. Adjourn:
A motion was made by Agent Szewczak and seconded by Agent Storey to adjourn the meeting at 10:39 p.m. Vote was 7-0-0.
Respectfully Submitted,
____________________________
Frank Poirot, Secretary
Last Updated: Friday, May 28, 2004 |