MINUTES ADOPTED AS PRESENTED 03/15/2010
ENFIELD TOWN COUNCIL
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
MONDAY, MARCH 1, 2010
The Regular Meeting of the Enfield Town Council was called to order by Chairman Kaupin in the Council Chambers of the Enfield Town Hall, 820 Enfield Street, Enfield, Connecticut on Monday, March 1, 2010. The meeting was called to order at 7:08 p.m.
PRAYER - The Prayer was given by Councilman Mangini.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – The Pledge of Allegiance was said.
ROLL-CALL – Present were Councilmen Bosco, Dumont, Edgar, Hall, Kaupin, Keller, Kiner, Lee, Mangini and Nelson. Councilman Crowley entered at 7:41 p.m. Also present were Town Manager, Matthew Coppler; Assistant Town Manager, Daniel Vindigni; Town Attorney, Kevin Deneen; Director of Public Works, Piya Hawkes
FIRE EVACUATION ANNOUNCEMENT
Chairman Kaupin made the fire evacuation announcement.
MINUTES OF PRECEDING MEETINGS
MOTION #780 by Councilman Hall, seconded by Councilman Kiner to accept the minutes of the February 16, 2010 Special Meeting.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #780 adopted 9-0-1, with Councilman Mangini abstaining.
MOTION #781 by Councilman Nelson, seconded by Councilman Dumont to accept the minutes of the February 16, 2010 Regular Meeting.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #781 adopted 9-0-1, with Councilman Mangini abstaining.
MOTION #782 by Councilman Nelson, seconded by Councilman Hall to accept the minutes of the February 20, 2010 Special Meeting.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #782 adopted 6-0-4, with Councilmen Edgar, Keller, Kiner and Mangini abstaining.
SPECIAL GUESTS
Senator John Kissel was present as a special guest.
Senator Kissel stated the Governor released today her 2010 Deficit Mitigation Plan. He noted his first review of this document doesn’t show anything that hurts Enfield as far as funding for the current fiscal year that ends June 30th.
He stated beginning July 1st, the Governor proposes reducing municipal aide by $45 million dollars. He noted it’s not necessarily indicated which funding streams this would impact.
He noted it’s anticipated that the revenue shortfall for the current fiscal year is about $504 million dollars.
Senator Kissel stated he provided the Council a document which shows the 2010-2011 budget adjustments proposed by the Governor in her projections. He noted at this time the Governor’s office is projecting approximately a $684 million dollar shortfall for the following fiscal year. He pointed out that does not include the $504 million dollars which they are short now, therefore, the shortfall between now and June 30, 2011 is about $1.1 to $1.2 billion dollars, and that does not include the billions of dollars of shortfall that are projected when the next Legislature grapples with the biennium budget.
He stated if the Legislature was going about its business properly, they would have reached some kind of budget agreement prior to June 30th of last year. He noted because this dragged on, it was just passed in September. He stated that was a biennial budget, therefore, it covers where they are right now and going forward. He noted there will be a new Governor for the second half of the next fiscal year, but the current Governor is constitutionally charged to address this. He stated the Governor wants the ability to expand the percentage of the State budget that she can cut, but that has to be granted by the Legislature.
Senator Kissel stated one of his concerns with the budget that passed in September was that they were in deficit from the previous fiscal year by over $900 million dollars. He noted at that time they had a rainy day fund of over a billion dollars. He stated the majority party in Hartford decided rather than have the ability to use the rainy day fund and spread it out over this year and next year, they issued bonds to cover that $900 million dollar deficit. He stated, as a taxpayer, what he finds most problematic is that these are seven-year bonds, and so that they didn’t feel that they would have to deal with that, they made it so there’s no principal or interest for the first two years. He noted right now they’re not paying the price for that on paper. He stated by pushing it out to the last five years of those bonds the principal for the $900 million dollars in bonds will cost close to a quarter of a billion dollars in interest. He pointed out this is to pay for operating expenses that are now long gone.
Senator Kissel stated they have major structural problems in the State budget that will necessitate major reconfiguration of how they do business. He noted much of it is driven by personnel, but the Governor has negotiated an agreement with the State Employees Bargaining Coalition, which means there are no layoffs for many months. He noted he doesn’t want to see anyone lose their job.
He went on to note in the Governor’s proposal that just came out to try and address the current $500 million dollar shortfall, one remedy is to defer the State Employee Retirement System contribution, which was part of the State Employees Bargaining Coalition agreement with State employees. He noted the Governor proposed using her authority to postpone payment of $100 million dollars into that fund. He stated if a payment is deferred to a retirement fund or long-term obligations, at some point that has to be made up.
Senator Kissel stated they are looking at a very difficult situation, and things will get worse before they get better.
He noted he went to a panel presentation by top economists in the State of Connecticut and they indicated that Connecticut has lost around 88,000 jobs since this recession started. He pointed out that’s a lot of jobs for a State of 3.4 million people. He stated this is similar to what happened at the beginning of the 1990’s when there was a major financial crisis which impacted this part of the State more so than Fairfield County. He noted this one seems to be impacting Fairfield County more so than this part of the state, but it’s having a dramatic impact all across Connecticut.
He stated an important item from the discussion with the economists was that they foresee essentially a jobless recovery for at least the next five to ten years. He noted there is no prospect of huge revenue spikes in the future unless someone proposes raising taxes.
Senator Kissel stated another important consideration is that when they add in unemployment, which is ranging in Connecticut between 8% and 9%, and when they lay on top of that “under-employment”, that’s another 7% to 8%. He pointed out it would be very difficult for Connecticut to get out of this by raising revenue because the usual places they’d look for revenue isn’t there. He noted over 40% of State revenues are driven out of Fairfield County. He explained there are enough people in Fairfield County that have now “taken a whack” from where they were two years ago, that’s it’s having a huge impact on State revenues.
He stated going forward, it’s his commitment to be the best advocate he can for Enfield, however, there’s only so much they will be able to do. He went on to note he was not happy with the fact that the Governor created a list of many bonding projects, and at this point in time, it appears that $1.1 million dollars promised to the Town of Enfield is in great danger. He explained right now, given the financial situation the State of Connecticut is in, they are already in excess of their bonding cap. He noted by law, they have to get below that. He stated one of his objections is that the Governor went above and beyond to create a pool of funds for a loan program for small businesses and job creation.
Senator Kissel stated his concern was that Enfield met its part of the bargain, and he’s still hopeful to have those discussions with the Governor’s office and see what can be done about trying to get Enfield its $1.1 million dollars. He pointed out this will be a fight because it’s a difficult situation at this time.
Councilman Lee questioned the status of the Department of Corrections as concerns position cuts or a facility being closed. Senator Kissel stated Acting Commissioner Murphy has been doing a brilliant job, and he met with him three weeks ago. He noted at that time he asked if there were any plans to close any facilities, and Commissioner Murphy responded no, but that would change if population figures declined dramatically. He stated Commissioner Murphy strongly supports staff safety and the proper staff/inmate ratio. He stated at this time it appears correctional officer positions are secure.
Councilman Kiner questioned what can be done to get the $1.1 million dollars back to the Town of Enfield. Senator Kissel stated he already requested a meeting with the Governor and will be meeting with her tomorrow. He pointed out he has always been a staunch champion for Enfield, and every time something is taken away from Enfield, he speaks out.
Mr. Coppler noted the first sum of money was supposed to be $1.1 million dollars from the State Department of Education. He stated the Town already ready received $1.7 million dollars from the bonding portion.
Senator Kissel stated Representative Tallarita announced she secured money for the ball fields, and she deserves credit for that. He explained the money was split into two pools, and it took over a year to get the $1.7 million dollar portion with a promise to get the $1.1 million dollars later on. He noted the problem is he doesn’t know what’s going on between the Democratic leaders and Governor Rell and whether this is part of long term negotiation. He stated he does know the Governor has to reduce bonding by a certain amount to get below the bonding cap. He noted he wants to get the message across to the Governor’s office that they can still reduce their obligations on paper by a half million dollars and still give Enfield its $1.1 million dollars.
Councilman Mangini stated the bottom line is that they need property tax reform. She went on to note that towns shouldn’t be given mandates which can’t be funded. She stated her understanding the State Bond Commission hasn’t met during Governor Rell’s tenure. She questioned who “holds their feet to the fire”.
Councilman Mangini stated the Town Council is responsible for every dollar, and they take pride in the work they do. She noted she’s ashamed the State of Connecticut doesn’t respect the municipalities’ role. She requested Senator Kissel talk to the Governor about what can be done to help municipalities.
Councilman Lee agreed with Councilman Mangini. He requested Senator Kissel inform the Town whenever he perceives a new mandate so that the Town can go to Hartford to speak their mind.
Councilman Nelson stated the $1.1 million dollars is a huge priority to the Town of Enfield. He noted those monies should have come to the Town two years ago. He stated his concern Enfield will be a huge casualty of what’s “coming down the pike.” He questioned by how much is the State pension short, and Senator Kissel responded there’s a retirement pool and a healthcare pool. He noted the healthcare pool is much more in danger, and combined, he wouldn’t be surprised if they’re not in arrears by about $25 billion dollars.
Councilman Nelson stated his impression they’re not finding a way to either eliminate or take care of these shortfalls. He stated his belief that taking another $100 million dollars out of the pension fund isn’t a solution. He noted if the pension fund was fully funded, it probably would sustain itself. He stated if they keep borrowing, they’ll go backwards. He pointed out eventually there are no more places to take money from. He went on to note that if a prison is cut, Enfield will take a huge hit.
Senator Kissel stated he is the ranking Republican Senator on the Judiciary Committee, and this Committee has oversight over the Department of Corrections, and he has a very good working relationship with Commissioner Murphy. He stated when Commissioner Murphy told him he is not cutting any prisons in this area, it’s not going to happen. He noted he will call Commissioner Murphy tomorrow and get a response from him, and he will communicate that response to the Town Manager to be disseminated to the Town Council, and he will stay on top of this issue.
Referring to licensing fees, Councilman Nelson stated he is a small business owner, and his fees have doubled. Senator Kissel pointed out he voted “no” on those fees. He stated fees are getting out of control.
Senator Kissel referred to Senate Bill #1, which was being debated today. He stated his belief it entails eliminating the $250 LLC fee, but he believes it’s for entities that gross less than $50,000.
Councilman Hall questioned whether there’s any hope that Enfield might see the $1.1 million dollars from the State this fiscal year, or is there a timeline when more information will be available. He noted sometimes these are delicate situations. He pointed out the Governor already said she’s taking it away. He noted he can rush the answer, or he can see what unfolds, and there will be an appropriate time to get information. He stated he should have something relatively definitive by the end of March. He noted it’s his top priority to rescue that money for the Town of Enfield.
Councilman Hall stated she would like to see the Town Conveyance Tax become a permanent revenue source for the towns. She questioned if anything more has been heard about a Buyers’ Conveyance Tax, and Senator Kissel responded he has not, and his understanding of what’s going on in real estate is that there are a lot of houses on the market, and it’s difficult to find buyers because it’s an unstable environment. As concerns the Conveyance Tax, he noted he voted against making it permanent for a number of years, however, at this point in time, he doesn’t see that as an impediment to the real estate market or people buying and selling homes. He noted if the State isn’t living up to its responsibilities, this at least is a revenue stream that he has some say over.
Councilman Lee stated there’s a $2,500 incentive to hire someone, but at the same time there’s a mandate to give the person seven sick days. He noted these two things don’t jive, and the net is zero. He questioned why a business owner would want to take a risk to add employees if one incentive is going to go away in one year, and the requirement for the sick days will be in place forever or even expanded. Senator Kissel stated it’s well known that he supports the paid sick leave bill, and he has done so for four years in a row. He noted this is a proposal, and they’ll see where it goes. He pointed out it has not had enough support to get through. He stated it’s five sick days, which can’t be carried forward, and they have to be earned, and it only applies to employers of 50 or more. He stated he’s very mindful of trying to create a good, sound business environment.
Councilman Mangini stated she is also a realtor, and she supports Councilman Hall’s position regarding the Conveyance Tax. She noted CCM did some statistics, and it was found the average town would have a revenue loss of around $400,000 if they were to take away that revenue stream. She encouraged Senator Kissel to remember this when it comes time and to make this a permanent law. Senator Kissel stated he consistently voted against making that permanent, but this is one area where he has some element of control. He noted he doesn’t necessarily believe it will have a negative impact on real estate sales. He stated he will make that commitment and support this.
Councilman Crowley questioned how comfortable should Enfield be in participating in any other state funded projects when the town has to contribute money. Senator Kissel stated his belief in the future, he would have an attorney present and have written documentation. He noted he would be extraordinarily hesitant to engage in any kind of partnerships with the State at this time unless the Town has some kind of security.
Councilman Edgar questioned whether the State is looking at reinstituting tolls to create revenue. Senator Kissel stated his concern is that once they get tolls, it would be very difficult to get rid of them. He noted if they let the State have this authority, under the promise that toll revenue would supplant gasoline tax revenue, they may do it for a year or two, but then all of a sudden, they’ll have those two revenue streams, and they’ll never get rid of them. He stated he totally disagrees with the notion of tolls because he believes it would be a huge burden on a border community like Enfield. He pointed out there are a lot of people in the Department of Transportation and the Department of Economic Community Development that want to do rail lines, mass transportation upgrades, and they’re looking for revenue streams, and they will try to sell the idea of tolls. He stated his belief Enfield will suffer from this. He noted surrounding towns and cities know the back roads of Enfield and will take shortcuts through neighborhoods to avoid the tolls.
Chairman Kaupin stated his understanding the State of Connecticut is looking at $3.6 billion dollars each fiscal year of 2012, 2013, and 2014. He noted the $100,000 lead abatement for Old Town Hall could be added into the mix of Enfield’s share in the roll back of bonding. He stated Town Aid Road funds have been held up, and that amounts to $276,000 for Enfield. He noted the Bond Commission hasn’t met to release those funds. He requested this be looked into as well. He pointed out Enfield programmed road work in anticipation of those dollars, and if those monies don’t come through by the end of the fiscal year, that will be an additional hole that Enfield will have to dig itself out of. He went on to note at a recent meeting in Granby, the message was loud and clear on mandate reform. He stated the request then and is now to ask the Legislature to roll back the mandates three or four years and put a halt to them. He noted the game of delaying this for a year no longer works for municipalities. He stated when they’re looking at the total funding to a municipality, the State is very good at funding ECS and not funding all the other projects. He acknowledged education is important, but they look at municipal aid as one big bucket, and they budget it as a revenue. He stated with the Minimum Budget Requirement in place and small increases to ECS, and large cuts in all the other funds, it throws the burden onto the Town rather than on the School System.
Chairman Kaupin expressed his appreciation to Senator Kissel for coming to this meeting and his work on behalf of the Town.
Senator Kissel stated he would like to come back toward the end of April to provide an update to Council.
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS & PETITIONS
Jack Sheridan, 7 Buchanan Road
Stated his belief that giving any more money to Social Services without a matrix is totally unacceptable. He noted the Town needs to measure the results of every dollar they spend.
Mr. Sheridan stated they were supposed to sunset the Conveyance Tax years ago, but it continues. He noted his problem with Conveyance Tax is that they’re already taking a hit on the value of the homes, and now on top of that, they’re asking people to pay this tax.
As concerns the $1.1 million dollars for the fields, he suggests cutting the $1.2 million dollars for the bike path because it’s not needed.
He stated there are 86 foreclosures in Enfield as of today. He noted last year, there were 400 delinquent taxpayers in Enfield. He pointed out school enrollment is down 800 students in the last ten years, and they’re expected to go down between 100 and 200 more students next year. He noted they still have the same staffing, and something has to happen.
Mr. Sheridan stated Enfield spends over $14,500 per student. He noted with a family of three children, that’s $43,500, and if that family pays $4,500 in taxes, that leaves a hole of $39,000. He noted he wouldn’t complain if he saw results. He stated there’s no cost of living increase for social security, and there’s over a 14% increase in Medicare.
Anthony Quinones, 42 South River Street
Spoke about free dental service to anyone in Enfield. He noted this service is available at the Aetna building within the industrial park in Middletown, Connecticut on March 12 and 13. He noted this is being sponsored by the Connecticut Mission of Mercy. He stated he’s been involved with this program for the past three years, and he transports people to this facility. He stated the cost is about $600 to $700 per bus. He noted perhaps people will take notice of such things, and maybe they can do more of these small events to help less fortunate people in Enfield.
Mr. Quinones referred to the Higgins building and noted it is strategically placed and could be used for plug-in-place medical services. He explained medical services can go to different places and have programs for a few days. He noted regional centers are needed for plug-in-place set-up, i.e., x-ray machines require certain grounding techniques. He stated if the Town was able to clean up the Higgins building, and they were able to partner with some of these groups that are looking for regional places, the Town could conceivably get some revenue from different sources.
Mr. Quinones stated this is an opportunity to tap into a national need, and they’d be able to get the Higgins building back on line and provide all the residents in Enfield with free medical help.
Chairman Kaupin requested the Town Manager scan the paperwork submitted by Mr. Quinones and e-mail it to the whole Council.
Margaret Jedziniak, 232 Abbe Road
Questioned why Ms. Haughey isn’t spearheading this project instead of what she reads in the newspaper about what’s going to happen with the $150,000 grant. She went on to note she watched the last meeting on television, and she was shocked to see such a contentious meeting concerning the purchase of a $5,000 exercise machine to be used by school dropouts and others. She questioned why the Youth Services Director isn’t using the $150,000 grant for forming a group of older teens to pursue a more useful program such as an educational stimulus, i.e., an apprenticeship to carpentry and other meaningful things. She noted this could help teens learn a trade and feel as though they were accomplishing something worthwhile and providing a step toward self-sufficiency.
Ahmed Hammad, Green Valley Drive (student at Enfield High School)
Stated he is Co-President of Enfield Youth Council. He spoke about the importance of funding for Youth Programs. He noted childhood experiences are key, and the programs funded at the Youth Center help youth and cut down on violence. He thanked the Town Council for all of their support.
Patrick Knighton, Gatewood Drive (student at Enfield High School)
Stated he is a Co-President of the Enfield Youth Council. He spoke about prevention programs. He noted because of the economy, some parents are unable to afford the necessities their children require, i.e., exercise equipment. He went on to note there’s also a problem with childhood obesity, and one of the reasons for this is that they don’t have exercise equipment or secure places to play, particularly in Thompsonville. He noted the Youth Center is a place where youth can come together to play and learn together and share moments of joy and passion together. He stated if they cut out programs such as homework help, how will students stay in school. He noted this comes down to a pay-me-now, or pay-me-later situation. He stated they can either pay for good things to help youth, or they can pay for abortion clinics or jail sentences.
Mr. Hammad stated the youth are grateful for the Town’s support. He noted he sees youth having a great time at the youth center.
Anthony Quinones, 42 South River Street
Stated he heard from a small businessman in Thompsonville who complained about the terrible road conditions in Thompsonville.
COUNCILMEN COMMUNICATIONS & PETITIONS
Councilman Mangini commended the young men who came forward in their support for the Youth Center. She also commended Jean Haughey, the Director of Youth Services for her hard work. She noted Ms. Haughey puts together some great programs for the youth.
Councilman Mangini questioned whether there are any funds left for the Higgins building.
Councilman Mangini questioned whether there’s any funding available to help towns that are chosen to house a regional probate court. She encouraged the State to help offset the expenses involved in this effort.
Councilman Bosco commended the two young men who spoke for the Youth Center. He told them that if youth want to make it in this world, they shouldn’t worry about someone giving them something, but rather they have to go out and work for it. He noted there are many ways to get exercise without a gym. He agreed with Ms. Jedziniak’s suggestion of teaching youth a trade and skills that they can take with them through the rest of their lives.
Councilman Crowley stated the water company put in new water lines, and the project was started late in the season. He noted they will come back to address streets in Thompsonville when the asphalt plants re-open.
Councilman Crowley stated he recently participated in the Active Shooter Program. He noted he was very impressed with the Police Department, and this is a great program.
Councilman Crowley stated tomorrow night, Enfield High School’s boys’ basketball team is in the semi-finals of their league. The game is at 7:00 p.m. in the gym.
Councilman Hall stated she attended Liv Kibbe’s organizational meeting. She noted this young lady spoke at a recent Town Council meeting and shared about her efforts to make a difference in Enfield. She noted many high school students and some parents attended this meeting, and some items they’ll be working on include a food shelf collection at the high schools, putting together things for a children’s hospital as well as other ideas. She stated her belief they’ll see some very good things come from Ms. Kibbe’s efforts.
Councilman Hall stated there will be a future fundraiser, and Tom Chapin, Harry Chapin’s brother, will be coming to Fermi High School to perform. She noted the tickets will be $15, and all the money will be going to the Enfield Food Shelf. She stated the date is July 23rd at 7:30 in Fermi’s auditorium.
Councilman Hall thanked the two young men who spoke in support of the Youth Center. She stated her belief they are not waiting for people to give them things. She added her belief they’ve done a great job. She noted they do some great work at the Youth Center. She stated her belief these two young men expressed themselves very well.
Councilman Kiner agreed with Councilman Hall and stated his belief these two young men were very eloquent, and he thanked them for expressing their point of view with the Council.
Councilman Crowley commended these two young men for coming before the Council. He went on to note that the playoffs will start on Saturday mornings for the 7th and 8th grade basketball teams. He noted this involves all the youth in Enfield that participate in the recreation department.
Councilman Nelson thanked the two young men who spoke before the Council. He pointed out these young men are honor students and he supports them, and he believes the Town should stand behind such youth. He stated he has a problem rewarding out-of-school youth with the same reward the good students are getting. He stated his belief they should do more to fund programs for model students. He noted this could be an incentive to encourage students to do well in school.
Councilman Nelson stated his understanding Alden Avenue was part of the Roads Program, and this is why the water company went in and did their work before the Town repaved the road. He stated his belief High Street wasn’t part of the Roads Program, and if the road is in bad shape due to the water company’s work, shouldn’t they be responsible for replacing that road if a repair isn’t acceptable. He stated he would like this to be looked into.
MOTION #783 by Councilman Nelson, seconded by Councilman Mangini to suspend the rules to move to Miscellaneous Items A1, A2 and D.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #783 adopted 11-0-0.
Councilman Lee stated Coach Sweeney of the Fermi Ladies’ Falcon team informed him Fermi won their first state game tonight with a score of 57-55.
MOTION #784 by Councilman Lee, seconded by Councilman Crowley to add an item under Items for Discussion – Program Income Re-use Plan for the Office of Community Development.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #784 adopted 11-0-0.
Chairman Kaupin stated Ahmed and Patrick are both members of the Mayor’s Advisory Council as well. He noted these young men are both very informative and intelligent, and they represent their school well. He stated they also do a lot of work for the Enfield Youth Council. He thanked them for speaking at this evening’s meeting. He noted they should be role models for their friends and colleagues at school and the Youth Center.
Chairman Kaupin thanked all the residents who attended the quarterly Public Informational Meeting which was held at H.B. Stowe. He noted this was the best-attended meeting they’ve had since they instituted this type of meeting over two years ago. He stated the next Public Informational Meeting is scheduled for the end of May. He encouraged everyone to attend these meetings where they have an open back and forth session. He noted the Council, Town department heads and the Town Manager attends these meetings.
Chairman Kaupin stated the Council’s packet includes the CRCOG goal setting session.
He stated on March 5th, Enfield has four police officers riding in the Police Unity Tour, and they’re holding a fundraiser at the Ramada Inn in Windsor Locks beginning at 6:00 p.m. He noted the cost is $20 per person, and each officer raises funds, and the minimum commitment that each officer has to raise is $1,700. He stated the funds raised through this bike tour goes to the National Law Enforcement Memorial in Washington, D.C. He pointed out they ride 300+ miles.
Chairman Kaupin stated the weekend of March 12 through March 14th the North Central Chamber of Commerce is holding their Home Product Show at Asnuntuck Community College. He urged everyone come out and support the Chamber and the businesses in the region.
TOWN MANAGER REPORT & COMMUNICATIONS
Mr. Coppler stated there’s a report before the Council regarding where things stand with the sidewalk clearing citations.
He noted the Council has before them the Central Connecticut Solid Waste Authority Ordinance information. He reminded the Council that CRCOG was working on putting together an alternative to CRRA, and they’ve now put together an ordinance which would have to be adopted by any community wishing to join the regional solid waste authority. He stated he planned on placing this on the next Council agenda.
Mr. Coppler stated he provided the Council the different options for the graduation.
He noted they also provided an update based upon some changes to the alarm ordinance.
Mr. Coppler stated IT will start the rollout next Wednesday for the new phone system for the Town and Schools. He noted all the cut overs will happen after 5:00 p.m., therefore, there shouldn’t be any disruption in the business day.
He stated the second phase of the Thompsonville Transit Center has now gone out to RFQ, and this is the design phase being put together. He noted they hope to select a consultant to do the final design within the next few months. He stated they hope to start construction sometime next year.
Chairman Kaupin questioned which facility this relates to, and Mr. Coppler responded this relates to the bus part of the multi-modal facility. Chairman Kaupin questioned if this is new construction plus parking, and Mr. Coppler responded that’s correct.
Councilman Nelson questioned whether this has anything to do with the building currently located in this area, and Mr. Coppler responded no, adding as part of the final design, they will get into that, but it won’t be a full build-out design for that building.
Councilman Nelson questioned if the environmentals have been done for that area, and Mr. Coppler responded yes at least for Phase I. He noted for Phase II, there may be some more as part of the final design, especially on the properties that aren’t owned by the Town.
Councilman Crowley questioned if this project will be located on the west side of the tracks, and Mr. Coppler responded it would be on the west side of the tracks, right next to the Dow Mechanical Building. Councilman Crowley questioned whether there will be enough room for the buses to get under the train tracks. Mr. Coppler stated part of the design will look at that. He noted the location will not impede the ability to expand that underpass, and this is one of the things that they need to get addressed, either as part of the multi-modal piece of this, or as part of the ultimate commuter rail piece.
Councilman Crowley stated he brought this up because it was brought to his attention that they’re not going to start building a building if they can’t get the buses under the tracks. Mr. Coppler stated as part of the preliminary engineering, they actually had a CT Transit bus come and drive under the underpass. He noted the only problem they encountered was the turning radius onto North River Street. He stated that will be part of the overall development plan for the multi-model bus portion of the project.
Councilman Crowley questioned if the old power plant property is part of this project. Mr. Coppler stated that is currently owned by CL&P, and they’ve had discussions with Northeast Utilities on that, and they’re aware of what the Town is looking at. He noted obviously to be able to do a complete plan, the Town will be looking at that property.
Mr. Coppler stated they recently had a meeting with representatives from Somers, Stafford, an Enfield Council member, the First Selectmen from those two towns as well as the Probate Court judges and they discussed the merger of the probate court, the name of the court and the location. He stated as a name, they came up with “The Probate Court District of North Central Connecticut”. He questioned if anyone had any opposition to this name selection, and there was no objection.
Mr. Coppler stated at the recent Informational Meeting there was a request by a Council member to have Mr. Hawkes address the way they handle snow clearing.
Mr. Hawkes noted the question was why do they clean their parks, and is there a liability if they don’t clear the parks of snow. He stated parks are cleared by Building and Grounds, and this is done because there are trash cans in parks, therefore, they make several passes after snow events so solid waste trucks can get into the parks to pick up trash. He stated there is a liability, therefore, they do clear parks.
Mr. Hawkes stated a question was also raised about the possibility of saving a position if they didn’t clear parks, and he noted the answer would be no. He went on to note they clear the South River Street boat launch so that emergency response people can access this area. He added there’s also a water pump station at the boat launch that has to be accessible.
Councilman Dumont stated parks should be cleared so that people can access the parks for walking.
As concerns Councilman Nelson’s question about the need to re-do all of High Street, Mr. Coppler questioned if the contractor repairs the road to the degree they are suppose to, would it necessitate that the whole street would have to be rebuilt. Mr. Hawkes stated the contractor is only required to repair to Town standards, therefore, it’s not a full depth job from curb to curb, and involves where the contractor cut into the road and six to eight inches beyond the edge of that trench. Mr. Coppler pointed out the Town does have a bond on this work, and should the repair not be done to the degree it needs to be, the Town can hold the bond over the head of the contractor so that they would have to come back and make proper repairs.
Mr. Coppler stated the Town will be present at the upcoming Home Show. He noted the Town will have a booth about recycling.
Mr. Coppler stated he’s unaware of a Higgins Fund. Chairman Kaupin stated such a fund would be long defunct.
Mr. Coppler referred to Councilman Mangini’s comment about funding from the State for the establishment of a regional probate court office, and he noted they would need to talk to their State Legislature to make sure they’re aware of this need. Councilman Mangini pointed out funding will be necessary if the court remains in Enfield. Mr. Coppler stated there’s no savings to any of the towns making this merger, but there is savings to the Probate Court.
Councilman Nelson noted Enfield offers the most easily accessible Probate Court compared to the other towns.
Mr. Hawkes spoke about the need of upgrades for the gazebo. He noted the gazebo is 26 years old. He stated items needing attention are the roof, a sidewalk, missing brick pavers, and some painting for the railings.
Discussion followed about the pros and cons of cleaning and sealing the roof or totally replacing the shingles.
It was the consensus of the Council to replace the roof with the same red cedar shingles and to connect the new concrete sidewalk around the gazebo to the monument. It was noted there’s $25,000 in this account. Chairman Kaupin suggested also shoring up the bricks and mortar on the deck and stairs.
TOWN ATTORNEY REPORT AND COMMUNICATIONS
Attorney Deneen stated he had no formal report this evening.
REPORT OF SPECIAL COMMITTEES OF THE COUNCIL
Councilman Mangini stated she and Councilman Hall attended the radio refarming meeting on February 23rd, and they’re waiting for the results of the Phase II study. She noted she’s going to the National League of Cities in Washington, D.C., and she will be lobbying for $7 million dollars for this project.
Councilman Hall stated the Clean Energy Committee met, and they’re doing a challenge between the Town buildings to see who can save the most energy. She noted this is being done for Earth Day. She explained they will choose a month and compare that month to last year’s bills to see how much can be saved. She stated they’re also going before the Board of Education to offer the same challenge for the students to participate at each of the schools. She pointed out West Hartford did such a challenge, and they saved 30% in their power bills for a month.
Councilman Hall stated she attended her first subcommittee meeting for the refarming, and she found it very interesting and very complex. She noted she learned that along with the $7.5 million dollars, they came up with another plan involving rebanding their present UHF channels. She explained instead of $7.5 million dollars, they’re looking at $2.5 million dollars. She noted at the subcommittee meeting, presentations will be put together for both plans, and that will come before the Town Council.
Councilman Mangini stated one of the main themes that came up at the refarming meeting is that they want to look at the dollars and the long range cost savings, and they should know more after that next meeting.
OLD BUSINESS
All appointments remained tabled.
Items C, D, and E. remained tabled.
MOTION #784 by Councilman Mangini, seconded by Councilman Nelson to remove Item F from the table.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #784 adopted 11-0-0.
DISCUSSION RE: COVERING OF ATHLETIC FIELDS FOR EVENT USE
Mr. Coppler stated the Council has before them the figures for the four different options. He noted the Council already discussed Options 1 through 3, and the new option involves one site for two days. He noted the concept would be a sufficiently sized tent that could seat 2,000 people at one site, along with all the necessary amenities. He stated they’d first have to find a location for the event. He noted this is estimated at about $13,766. He stated there would still be staff time for stage set-up and breakdown. He noted they’d also need an electric service connection. These additional charges would amount to $3,500 for the two days. He added they’d still need the contingent of police officers for the two days, and that cost is the same as if they were doing different sites, and that amounts to $3,845. He noted the total cost for one site for two days is estimated at $21,170.
Chairman Kaupin stated his belief they were to forward these options and estimates to the Board of Education so they can use this information for their decision-making.
Councilman Crowley stated if they decide to hold the graduation off-site, does the event stay in Enfield, or can they go anywhere they wish. Mr. Coppler noted the one site concept they looked at would be at a site within Enfield that meets the parameters of accessibility and parking.
Councilman Lee questioned what the Town has budgeted currently for this activity. Chairman Kaupin stated the Town has labor responsibility, and the Board of Education covers the rest of the expense.
Mr. Coppler stated he will pass this information to the Board of Education.
MOTION #785 by Councilman Lee, seconded by Councilman Keller to remove this item from the agenda.
Councilman Crowley wanted it to be clear that the Town Council isn’t sending a message that the Town is purchasing a covering for the field. Chairman Kaupin noted that is their understanding. Mr. Coppler stated the only thing budgeted for this event relates to any employees that are working regular time. He noted overtime isn’t budgeted for this, nor is anything budgeted for the purchase of any of the field protection or tent rental.
Councilman Crowley questioned if this information can be posted on the Town’s website, and Chairman Kaupin pointed out as soon as the minutes are posted on the Town’s website, this information will be available.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #785 adopted 11-0-0.
NEW BUSINESS
RESOLUTION #786 by Councilman Nelson, seconded by Councilman Hall.
WHEREAS, the Town of Enfield has received a request from Attorney Thomas W. Fahey, dated January 5, 2010 to abandon the undeveloped right-of-way between Barrett and South Road; and
WHEREAS, the Council must refer this proposed transaction to the Planning and Zoning Commission for a report in conformance with the requirements of Connecticut General Statute 8-24;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the proposed abandonment described above be referred to the Planning and Zoning Commission in conformance with the requirements of Connecticut General Statute 8-24.
Mr. Coppler stated there was a question regarding if Council forwards this to Planning & Zoning if he could do a letter to Planning & Zoning to let them know that once the property is approved to sell, it be done through public auction. He noted he can put this memo together and forward it.
Councilman Nelson stated the public should have the right to know what the Town’s intent is regarding this.
Councilman Edgar questioned whether the Town should abandon this. He noted with the new development going into that area, this is a road that could be used for emergency access by EMS and the fire and police departments. He stated his belief the Town should consider saving this road and extending it out.
Councilman Crowley stated his impression the intent was that there would be a gate available for emergency personnel if they needed access. Mr. Coppler stated he does not recall the design that was submitted to Development Services. He added he recalls an earlier discussion whereby they would provide some type of emergency access onto Barrett Road, but it would be gated.
Chairman Kaupin stated his understanding the back side of the proposed development had a gated entrance to Barrett Road in case of an emergency need.
Councilman Edgar agreed there were such discussions, however, the resolution states this road would be abandoned, and he believes that means that the Town is going to abandon this road from South Road to the Locke Drive area. He questioned whether the Town should do this for emergency purposes.
Chairman Kaupin suggested part of the letter read that this road be sold through public auction with no minimum reserve and ask Planning & Zoning to keep in mind emergency access to Barrett Road through the development.
Councilman Nelson pointed out this would be limiting the buyer to that development. He noted he’s sure Planning & Zoning will be sure that the Town can get all the appropriate emergency services access to where they need to go. He pointed out this is the job of Planning & Zoning.
Attorney Deneen suggested amending the resolution as follows:
“NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the proposed sale, discontinuance, transfer or abandonment described above be referred to the Planning and Zoning Commission in conformance with the requirements of Connecticut General Statute 8-24.”
Attorney Deneen stated the issue for the 8-24 is for the Planning & Commission to get recommendations as to whether to discontinue, abandon or sell this property. He noted if they approve or don’t recommend it, it would come back to the Town Council, and at that point, the Council could make such decisions that it deems as necessary.
AMENDMENT #1 by Councilman Hall, seconded by Councilman Nelson to amend the resolution as follows:
“NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the proposed sale, discontinuance, transfer or abandonment described above be referred to the Planning and Zoning Commission in conformance with the requirements of Connecticut General Statute 8-24.”
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared AMENDMENT #1 adopted 11-0-0.
Upon a ROLL-CALL vote being taken, the Chair declared RESOLUTION #786 adopted 11-0-0 as amended.
ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION
DISCUSSION RE: GOVERNOR’S ELIMINATION OF FERMI REMEDIATION MONIES
Councilman Mangini suggested the Town Council might wish to prepare a resolution or statement that they all can sign off on and have it delivered to the Governor’s office. She noted the resolution can let the Governor’s office know the Town is tired of the State not standing behind their commitment to Enfield. She stated this statement can be very strong in their request that these funds be released to Enfield.
Councilman Nelson questioned if they give the letter to the Governor, does she even have the power to do anything about this.
Chairman Kaupin stated he would be in support of this letter to the Governor if there’s a letter to the Speaker of the House, Chris Donovan and Donald Williams in the Senate. He pointed out Chris Donovan came to Enfield and promised this money. He stated he doesn’t believe they can point the finger to just one person. He noted this also requires approval by both the Governor and Legislature.
Councilman Lee stated this wasn’t money that came after the initial bonding, but rather this was money that was approved through the school system’s work with the Commissioner of Education and their program. He noted it’s the Commissioner of Education at the State level and his people that cancelled the funding that was supposed to come to Enfield. He pointed out this wasn’t suppose to be a secondary bond, but rather this was a State Department of Education Program that Enfield was allowed to apply for, were approved for, and then had those funds cancelled because Enfield was accused of double-dipping. He noted if they are going to be making demands, a very neat time line is going to be critical. He stated this goes far beyond the politics of who moves bonding money around. He noted this is a real red tape herring that started with the Department of Education and was lost there. He pointed out there have been a lot of letters and phone calls from a lot of Council people and residents to all of these offices over the last couple years. He stated this item really went off the tracks at the Department of Education.
Mr. Coppler added the sad part of this is that because of a failure to communicate at the State level in someone’s office, the State Department of Education did away with this funding. He pointed out this was guaranteed funding, and this only needed someone of leadership within the State government to call this Department of Education office and inform them the intent was the Department of Education pays the $1.1 million dollars, and the $1.7 million dollars is totally different than what the $1.1 million dollars was being funded for.
Councilman Nelson stated his belief Representative Jarmoc sits on the Education Committee. He noted if she does, is this a way for the Town to get this in the back door to get to that office that they need to communicate with. Councilman Kiner stated Rep. Jarmoc does sit on the Connecticut General Assembly Education Committee, but that is totally different from the Department of Education.
Councilman Bosco questioned whether the Town can sue the Department of Education, and Attorney Deneen stated generally, a town can’t sue the State under what’s called the Doctrine of Sovereign Immunity, unless there’s been a waiver of that.
Councilman Edgar stated he doesn’t object to a letter, however, Senator Kissel will be seeing the Governor tomorrow. He voiced concern this letter might interfere with what Senator Kissel might be able to do. He suggested holding off until the Council hears back from Senator Kissel.
Councilmen Nelson and Dumont agreed with Councilman Edgar.
Chairman Kaupin suggested the Town Manager draft a letter, and perhaps they can share it with Senator Kissel and Reps. Jarmoc and Tallarita.
PROGRAM INCOME REUSE PLAN
Councilman Lee stated he is bringing this before the Council at the request of the Revitalization Committee. He noted there’s been an on-going effort within this Committee to get the Enfield Community Development Corporation books squared away and re-chartered so they can start doing work in the community again.
He noted there’s a requirement that the State Department of Economic and Community Development has for the Program Income Reuse Program. He stated this would be how they are going to spend any funds that come back to the Town of Enfield from various programs. He noted this relates to all programs that Mr. Bryanton and the Town currently receive funds for through the CDBG Programs. He referred to Page 2 of the document before the Council, it spells out where program funds are going to be allocated to.
Councilman Lee explained this is before the Council because Mr. Bryanton submitted this to the State, and the State didn’t have any problems with it, but they sent it back stating one step missed was that this has to be endorsed by the legislative body. He noted their goal is that the Council endorses this at the next meeting in March. He suggested this item be included on the next regular meeting agenda.
Chairman Kaupin requested the Town Manager write up a resolution which can be included in the next regular meeting packet for the Town Council.
MISCELLANEOUS
MOTION #787 by Councilman Dumont, seconded by Councilman Nelson to approve the Consent Agenda.
Transfer $431.78 Information Technologies
Transfer $10,000 Historical Document Preservation Grant
Copies Attached
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #787 adopted 11-0-0.
RESOLUTION #787 by Councilman Nelson, seconded by Councilman Dumont.
WHEREAS, the Enfield Town Council wishes to update and amend the Article II Alarm Systems; and
WHEREAS, the Enfield Town Council held a pubic hearing on Tuesday, February 16, 2010 to seek input from the residents on the proposed amendments to this Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the Enfield Town Council believes adoption of these amendments to be important to the safety and welfare of all residents of the Town of Enfield.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Enfield Town Council does hereby adopt the amended and revised, attached as “Attachment A” Article II Alarm Systems.
Mr. Coppler stated the Council has before them the most recent amendment. He briefly reviewed the changes.
Attorney Deneen explained the Town can only lien property when there’s specific statutory authority to do so, and that authority exists in the property maintenance area and blight area. He noted this would involve those situations where the Town has to make properties safe and secure to protect the public. He pointed out there isn’t any authority to automatically lien a property in relation to this ordinance.
Councilman Lee referred to Section 34-35 A and B and questioned if 30 days is the longest this fine is going to mature, and if it gets to 31 days, it increases by $100, and it’s not every subsequent 30 days. Attorney Deneen indicated that’s correct. He noted on day 61, it can become an infraction ticket issued by the Police, which then puts it into superior court for a violation of the Town Ordinance.
Councilman Crowley questioned if fire false alarms are handled similarly, and Attorney Deneen stated the Town has no jurisdiction over the fire districts.
Attorney Deneen stated Section 34-33, Section B should be struck and the subsequent paragraphs should be renumbered accordingly.
Councilman Nelson questioned whether this has to go back for a Public Hearing. Attorney Deneen responded no and noted the whole idea of the Public Hearing is to take the public’s input and make changes. He noted a Public Hearing would be necessary if they were changing it into a completely unrelated ordinance.
To summarize, Councilman Nelson stated this ordinance results in there being no registration fee, it’s a one-time registration, and if there are no false alarms people will never have to pay anything.
Councilman Dumont stated this ordinance has been structured to discourage false alarms and to penalize those who repeatedly have false alarms.
Chairman Kaupin expressed his appreciation to those people who attended the recent Public Informational Meeting. He noted this is when they actually heard a lot of feedback from residents concerning this alarm ordinance.
Upon a ROLL-CALL vote being taken, the Chair declared RESOLUTION #787 adopted 11-0-0.
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
There were no comments from the public.
COUNCILMEN COMMUNICATIONS
Councilman Lee stated the Hazard Institute Conservancy Society has been working on their initiative to restore the institute. He noted they’re working with a few people in the community to start a videotaped archive of memories and stories of people from the Hazardville neighborhood or anyone around town who had experiences at the Institute or would like to tell stories about growing up in early Enfield and Hazardville. He noted there’s an appointment process to get this underway. He stated the number to schedule a videotaping is 860-614-8174. He noted this will be organized over the next six to eight weeks.
Councilman Bosco requested an update on Burnham Street, and Mr. Coppler noted he will look into this tomorrow.
ADJOURNMENT
MOTION #788 by Councilman Nelson, seconded by Councilman Kiner to adjourn.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #788 adopted 11-0-0, and the meeting stood adjourned at 10:44 p.m.
Appended to minutes of 03/01/2010
Regular Town Council Meeting
ENFIELD TOWN COUNCIL
REQUEST FOR TRANSFER OF FUNDS
RESOLUTION NO. ________
RESOLVED, that in accordance with Chapter VI, Section 8(f) of the Town Charter, the following transfer is hereby made.
TO: 1210 Information Technology
Copying & Reproduction 0240-01-0012-1210-00000-0551-00 $ 431.78
FROM: 1210 Information Technology
Professional Development 0240-01-0012-1210-00000-0322-00 $ 431.78
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the above-stated funds are available as of February 19, 2010.
A. Lynn Nenni, Director of Finance
APPROVED BY: _________________________ Town Manager Date: _________
ENFIELD TOWN COUNCIL
REQUEST FOR TRANSFER OF FUNDS
RESOLUTION NO. ________
RESOLVED, that in accordance with Chapter VI, Section 8(f) of the Town Charter, the following transfer is hereby made.
TO: Town Clerk
Historic Document Preservation Grant
Technical Services 100-01-15-1600-06036-340-00 $10,000
FROM: Miscellaneous State Revenue
100-01-00-0000-13990-000-00 $10,000
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the above-stated funds are available as of______________
A. Lynn Nenni, Director of Finance
APPROVED BY: _____________________ Town Manager Date: _________
Appended to minutes of 03/01/2010
Regular Town Council Meeting
ARTICLE II. ALARM SYSTEMS*
*State law references: Transmittal of false alarms, G.S. § 7-148(c)(7)(H)(14).
Sec. 34-31. Purpose.
The purpose of this article is to reduce needless alarms to which the division of police or other emergency service responds as a result of the activation of burglar, holdup, panic and fire alarms that automatically summon the division of police or other emergency service either via a central station, the division of police or automatic dialers.
Sec. 34-32. Definitions.
The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this article, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning:
Alarm system means an assembly of equipment and devices arranged to signal the presence of a hazard requiring urgent attention and to which the division of police or other emergency service is expected to respond. In this article, the term "alarm system" shall include but not be limited to the terms "automatic holdup alarm systems," "burglar alarm systems," "holdup alarm systems," "manual holdup alarm systems," "audible alarm systems" and "fire alarm systems." "Alarm systems" which monitor temperature, humidity or any other condition not directly related to the detection of an unauthorized intrusion into a premises or any attempted robbery or a fire or smoke condition at a premises are specifically excluded from the provision of this article, as are alternative "alarm systems" designed to notify of medical emergencies.
False alarm means the activation of any alarm system to which the division of police or other emergency service responds which is not caused by:
(1) Fire, a criminal act or other emergency.
(2) An act of nature, such as an earthquake, tornado or hurricane.
(3) Circumstances occurring off the protected property and within the control of either the subscriber, his alarm business or his answering service.
(4) A person motivated solely by criminal, malicious or mischievous intent.
Protected Property means any property which is monitored by, protected by or maintains an Alarm System as defined above.
Subscriber means a person who buys and/or leases or otherwise obtains an alarm system and thereafter installs it or has it installed. The term "subscriber" shall also mean a person who has control of premises in which an operable alarm system exists, with the ultimate responsibility for the alarm system being with the property owner.
Sec. 34-33. Registration; Notifications; Imposition of Penalties.
(a) Existing alarm systems must, within ninety (90) days of the adoption of Ordinance ___ be registered with the Town of Enfield. Alarm registration forms will be provided by the Town.
(b) For new alarms installed after the adoption of Ordinance ___ , the protected property must, in addition to obtaining any building, electrical or other permits, register with the Enfield Police Department.
(c) Upon a police or other emergency services response to a false alarm at a Protected Property, a notice of such response shall be left at the property or mailed to the property owner as shown on the Assessor’s records of the Town of Enfield, noting the date and time of the response and that a false alarm was noted. Said notice shall also include a notification of the penalties that may be imposed as set forth below.
(d) The town will charge the subscriber of an alarm system a penalty of $15.00 for the first emergency services or police response to a false alarm, and a penalty of $90.00 for each subsequent false alarm for a registered protected property, and a penalty of $90.00 for the first and any subsequent false alarm for any unregistered protected property.
(e) The provisions of this ordinance shall not apply to alarms owned or used by the Town of Enfield or its agencies, including the Board of Education, the State of Connecticut or the United States of America.
Sec. 34-34. Right to appeal.
Any person issued a citation pursuant to this section shall be entitled to a hearing to contest the citation pursuant to the provisions of G.S. § 7-152c. The Town Manager shall appoint a hearing officer. The hearing officer shall not be a police officer or any other town employee.
Sec. 34-35. Payment of fines.
(a) All fines payable under this article will be made to the Town of Enfield and, unless appealed pursuant to section 34-34, will be due and payable immediately upon the issuance of the citation, subject to the abatement and waiver provisions as set forth in section 34-33. If a registrant or property owners fails to pay any fine within thirty (30) days of when it is due, the levied fine shall be increased by $100.00.
(b) Continued failure to pay the fine may result in an Infraction (State/Court ticket) being issued to the registrant or property owner for failure to comply with a Town ordinance.
Sec. 34-36. Administration and enforcement.
The chief of police will enforce and administer this article and any rules and regulations promulgated. The chief of police shall also report to the town council on an annual basis.
Sec. 34-37. Violation of article.
A violation of this article shall be an infraction pursuant to G.S. § 51-164p. |