MINUTES ADOPTED AS PRESENTED 04/05/2010
ENFIELD TOWN COUNCIL
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
MONDAY, MARCH 15, 2010
The Regular Meeting of the Enfield Town Council was called to order by Chairman Kaupin in the Council Chambers of the Enfield Town Hall, 820 Enfield Street, Enfield, Connecticut on Monday, March 15, 2010. The meeting was called to order at 7:10 p.m.
PRAYER - The Prayer was given by Board of Education Chairman Gregory Stokes.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – The Pledge of Allegiance was said.
ROLL-CALL – Present were Councilmen Bosco, Dumont, Edgar, Hall, Kaupin, Keller, Lee and Nelson. Councilmen Crowley, Kiner and Mangini were absent. Also present were Town Manager, Matthew Coppler; Assistant Town Manager, Daniel Vindigni; Sr. Assistant Town Attorney, Maria Elsden; Director of Public Works, Piya Hawkes; Community Development Director, Peter Bryanton; Director of Finance, Lynn Nenni
FIRE EVACUATION ANNOUNCEMENT
Chairman Kaupin made the fire evacuation announcement.
MINUTES OF PRECEDING MEETINGS
MOTION #791 by Councilman Hall, seconded by Councilman Nelson to accept the minutes of the March 1, 2010 Special Meeting.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #791 adopted 8-0-0.
MOTION #792 by Councilman Nelson, seconded by Councilman Hall to accept the minutes of the March 1, 2010 Regular Meeting.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #792 adopted 8-0-0.
SPECIAL GUESTS
Present were State Representatives Karen Jarmoc and Kathy Tallarita.
Chairman Kaupin explained the State Representatives are present to provide an update on the fiscal health of the State of Connecticut and any legislation that may be proposed.
Rep. Jarmoc stated they’re looking at a $500 million dollar deficit in the current budget. She noted Governor Rell has proposed a mitigation plan to reduce that deficit. The Legislature will act upon her recommendations by mid-April. The bonding commission will be meeting tomorrow morning to release $276,033 to the Town of Enfield for road aide. It’s estimated that money will be received in the next three to four weeks. The Town of Enfield received $28,380,000 in Educational Cost Sharing Funds, which is at the same level as the previous fiscal year.
Rep. Jarmoc stated the Governor proposed $504 million dollars in deficit mitigation recommendations, and this still falls short by about $30 million dollars of what they actually need to achieve. The appropriations committee is currently reviewing those recommendations. The budget that was passed in September did include $3 billion dollars in cuts, but it still maintained funding for things such as Family Resource Centers, Dial-A-Ride programs, Educational Cost Sharing monies, and town aid grant money.
Rep. Jarmoc stated in Fiscal Year 2011, there’s a $700 million dollar state deficit and in Fiscal Years 2012 and 2013, a $5 billion dollar deficit. She noted things will become very difficult for the state. She stated the Legislature is forced to use this as an opportunity to change their government and how it functions. She noted they must function in a different way. She pointed out there are many like-minded state agencies that have separate human resources, finance and payroll departments, and these are the kinds of things they will be looking at to become more efficient.
Rep. Tallarita spoke about Municipal Opportunities & Regional Efficiencies (M.O.R.E.). She explained she chaired the Mandates and Grants section of this committee. She noted she met with several town officials to learn what they would like done on the town side. She stated a document was produced which was broken down into short and long range goals.
Rep. Tallarita acknowledged the Town of Enfield is trying to do their part in regionalizing and working with other communities as well as other agencies within the Town of Enfield. She pointed out M.O.R.E. is looking at incentives to encourage towns to regionalize.
She reviewed some of the areas where relief could be provided for municipalities, such as the repeal of web site posting requirements; relief from responsibility for evicted tenant possessions; a three-year delay for in-school suspension; changes to property tax laws governing telecom towers; establishing a floor for depreciation of personal property.
Rep. Tallarita highlighted some revenue streams for municipalities:
- An increase in hotel lodging tax with one-third going to host towns, one-third going to all towns in host region and one third dedicated to launching regionalism initiatives
- Allowing towns to charge fees based on cost of services
- Extending the real estate conveyance tax (looking at making this permanent)
Rep. Tallarita referred to the $1.1 million dollars for the Fermi High remediation work and explained the Governor put out Senate Bill #25, which basically takes all authorizations for bonding that have not been used and doing away with them. She noted in 2006, Enfield started the Fermi fieldwork, but found a problem which increased the cost of the project. She stated she went to the State in an attempt to get the remaining money for this project. The project itself was going to cost $2.8 million dollars, however, she requested $3.3 million dollars in bonding. She stated at that point, there was an agreement with the State Department of Education that they would reimburse 75.36% for a school construction project. She noted this reimbursement amounted to $1.1 million dollars. She pointed out after the project was completed, the Town was able to get $3.3 million dollars for the remediation project. She noted when they went to get the money released from the bond act, she wrote a letter to the Speaker and Governor asking for what they thought they needed, which was the $1.7 million dollars because it was believed they were getting the $1.1 million from the Department of Education, therefore, they didn’t need the $2.8 million dollars. She went on to explain in August, 2008 the Bond Commission released the $1.7 million dollars, and then in July, 2009 the Town of Enfield received that money. She stated since that time, the Town has been fighting for the $1.1 million dollars from the Department of Education. She pointed out the Department of Education feels that because the Town received State funding for the $1.7 million dollars, they no longer have to agree to the $1.1 million dollars.
Rep. Tallarita stated at this time she has spoken with the Speaker of the House, the Chairs of Finance, the Bonding Chairs, and the Governor’s Office. She noted they’re trying to get the $1.1 million dollars released from the Governor’s proposed legislation. She explained if the Governor’s bill passes in its entirety, the $1.1 million dollars is gone. She noted she was told she can request through the Governor’s office to put this on the Bond agenda to get it passed. She stated at this time she is working with the attorney to make sure the Department of Education will not continuing saying this is “double-dipping”.
Councilman Nelson stated the Town Council has tried to maintain level taxes in Enfield, and did so three years in a row. He questioned whether the State plans increasing taxes in the next budget. He pointed out a state tax increase would not help municipalities. Rep. Jarmoc stated they can’t predict right now what the budget will look like next year. She noted the question is how far can they cut and impact people before there has to be a different way to balance things. Rep. Tallarita added she can’t make a promise about raising taxes in a year when 169 towns are asking the state not to cut their funding.
Councilman Nelson stated cutting unfunded mandates would be helpful. He went on to note it’s getting harder to meet the MBR requirement. Rep. Tallarita stated the M.O.R.E. Commission stated one recommendation is that they take a look at the MBR and the possibility of doing away with it. She went on to note another thing M.O.R.E. is looking at is that the state has to be able to back-up mandates with dollars.
Rep. Jarmoc referred to high school graduation reform and the increase in requirements for students to graduate from high school. She stated she grapples with this because she’s not so sure adding on a language requirement or a capstone experience means that a student is better prepared. She noted she’s involved with Asnuntuck Community College, and 50% to 80% of students coming to that college are requiring remedial help before they can begin classes.
Councilman Hall questioned what the Council could do regarding the Governor’s bond agenda and the timeline they have to get this money. Rep. Tallarita suggested communicating with the Governor’s Office within the next couple weeks. Rep. Jarmoc added the Governor’s Office stated they’d like to hear more from people.
Councilman Hall stated there are other projects the Town is supposed to be moving forward with, but it makes them think about state monies, i.e., the Still Meadow project.
Mr. Coppler stated the Still Meadow issue relates to contaminated wells. He noted the Town is funding the engineering part of this project, but it could be six to eight months before the bond commission acts on this. He pointed out this project, which is supposed to break ground this spring, could be held off three or four years. He noted this would impact those residents.
Rep. Tallarita questioned whether DEP is advocating for those bond dollars, or is the Town supposed to be doing this. Mr. Coppler stated Enfield is working with DEP on this, and DEP gets their funding through the Bond Commission. Rep. Tallarita requested the Town forward her information on this, and she will follow up with DEP regarding the bonding.
Councilman Hall referred to the hotel tax and questioned the one-third breakdown and why a higher amount isn’t coming to the town. Rep. Jarmoc stated the premise of the legislation is to try to increase incentives for regionalism as well, and those percents would assist in that effort. She noted they could try for more.
Councilman Hall voiced her support of the conveyance tax because it’s a good revenue for the town and doesn’t effect the market.
Councilman Lee questioned the wisdom of continuing to spend money on greater and greater incentives for regionalization just to get a result that shouldn’t even be sought if it wasn’t attractive in the first place. Rep. Tallarita stated her belief they’re not actually saying they will spend dollars for incentives, but rather it would be creating tax incentives to municipalities. Councilman Lee stated the motivation to regionalize or cooperate should be based on the outcome, not because there’s a potential incentive or tax break.
Chairman Kaupin stated Town Aid Roads was budgeted as a revenue for the Town in May, 2009, therefore, this is something they’ve anticipated all year long. He noted Enfield has road projects that those funds were targeted for. Rep. Jarmoc stated these were monies voted for in the budget, and they’re glad this is finally resolved.
Chairman Kaupin stated the approximately $100,000 for lead abatement for Old Town Hall should be rescinded as well since the project is done.
Chairman Kaupin acknowledged ECS has remained flat, but there are other funding sources for the town that have decreased. He noted by keeping ECS whole and by keeping the MBR as law, it requires that as a minimum a town level-funds education. He noted with declining revenues, the Town side of the budget is taking a hit. He stated when they look at aid to municipalities, they should look at it as a whole.
As concerns the MBR, Chairman Kaupin stated his understanding it was reauthorized through legislation for the current and next fiscal years.
Chairman Kaupin stated he doesn’t mind if the state has to reduce aid to municipalities if they’re offsetting reductions in the town’s cost that occur through the unfunded mandates.
Chairman Kaupin questioned what the feeling is at the state level for the reduction in municipal aid in order to get to the required numbers. Rep. Tallarita stated they do not yet have a concrete direction. She noted they’re looking at the possibility of the consolidation of agencies.
Rep. Jarmoc stated in Fiscal Year 2012 and 2013, the state will not be able to borrow any more because more than likely the rainy day fund and other unused money will be depleted. She stated this will force this legislative body to function in a more effective manner. She noted they will have to consolidate agencies if they’re to reduce the deficit. She stated government has to become smaller and more efficient. She pointed out there’s no alternative.
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS & PETITIONS
Ahmed Hammad, Green Valley Drive (student at Enfield High School)
Stated he recently learned that advanced classes at Enfield High School may be cut due to budgetary constraints. He noted he cares about his education and wants to speak out on behalf of high school students. He stated he is a junior and all through his high school years he has taken challenging courses and achieved high grades so that he’d be able to take the advanced classes in his senior year. He pointed out other students have been working hard as well to achieve this goal. He acknowledged the economy is difficult, but urged the Council to make wise decisions. He noted he also addressed the Board of Education concerning this issue, and they’re still deciding what to do concerning this matter.
Kelly Hemmler and Carrie Robinson of Voices for Thompsonville
Invited everyone to attend the Voices for Thompsonville meeting this Thursday at 7:00 p.m. at the Polish National Home. Peter Bryanton will give a presentation about the intermodal transit center, and there will be an open forum as well.
Curtis Kalagher, Pierce Street (Stowe School)
Stated his belief cutting sports and other classes at JFK Middle School and the high schools would not be beneficial because people may leave Enfield, and this town could become a ghost town. He noted he looks forward to participating in sports at JFK when he gets there in two years. He urged the Town provide a little more money so children can continue being educated.
Sara Levinthal-O’Farrell, 37 David Street
Considers the education budget before the Council a gross injustice to Enfield children, their ability to learn, achieve and prosper as future productive members of society. She stated her belief the opinions and justifications made by the Board of Education majority vote clearly showed their lack of reasonable knowledge regarding what it takes to provide quality curriculum and spirited study in an emotionally and physically safe school environment. She pointed out they too quickly disregarded Dr. Gallacher’s initial proposed budget and directed him to cut an additional $1.5 million in one week’s time, even though he referred to these kinds of cuts as near impossible and draconian.
She stated she’s disgusted that the Board of Education Republican majority with a no sweat, pompous attitude gave Dr. Gallacher this charge with no consideration or heedfulness for its total and disastrous ramifications. She noted they did not weigh the
concerns of what’s essential, show any passion for education, or the well being of the children. She stated her belief they simply reduced the children’s worth to pennies.
Ms. Levinthal-O’Farrell stated some of these cuts equate to 70 teachers and staff positions being lost, guidance counselors and support staff lost, reading readiness programs and tutors lost, elementary classes at 27 to 30 students, advanced placement programs lost, technology and computer education programs lost, art and music programs lost, athletic programs lost and students’ future dreams and aspirations totally compromised.
She stated past and currently proposed cuts are decimating education in Enfield. She noted they are not adequately supporting the resources needed to provide quality education. She noted student performance has and will be effected, and school rankings will continue to be embarrassingly poor, accreditation will be compromised, CMT and CAPT scores will plummet, the No Child Left Behind adequate yearly progress status will inevitably drop to a need for improvement, all while Enfield continues to make ridiculous cuts when Enfield’s per spending and comparison state-wide and in the DRG (other comparable school districts) is markedly low.
She stated according to the Strategic School Profile table located on the Connecticut State Department of Education website, close to 70% of school districts in Enfield’s DRG spend more per pupil than Enfield does. She noted statewide the disparity is even worse at just over 80% of school districts spending more.
She noted the Town Council holds the purse string to this education budget, and they also hold the vote to make things right. She urged the Council value the Town’s children, their education, their well being and their future. She stated she truly believes that how they treat children is an authentic, accurate reflection of the integrity of this community, and she feels they’re failing miserably. She noted the Board of Education, the Town Council and this community must place education at a much higher level. She stated regardless of the budget request received from the Board of Education, she urges the Council take responsible, forthright action and find a way to adequately fund education. She concluded stating children have to matter.
Frank Wood, 31 Glendale Road
Stated in the 21st century, a person must not only complete high school, but also go onto a trade school, community college or a university. He noted this advanced education has become necessary to acquire the skills needed to become a machinist, a lawyer, plumber, auto repair technician, doctor, truck driver, accountant, etc. He stated a person must have a solid, well-rounded high school education as its foundation.
Mr. Wood stated based on the actions of the Board of Education, and in particular the Town Council over the past few years, it’s evident that education in Enfield has been de-valued. He noted much of the public commentary made by some elected officials and community members militates against adequate funding for education. He stated the actions resulting from this attitude have caused ever-increasing classroom populations at the elementary level and important electives are in jeopardy at the secondary level.
He stated clearly money isn’t the only requirement to provide a good, high quality education, however, adequate funding is certainly in the mix of those things needed to insure a well-educated high school graduate.
Mr. Wood stated at budget time last year, every group within the purview of the budget was asked to sacrifice in the effort to balance the budget, except himself. He stated when he offered a member of the Town Council to offer to pay his share through a modest tax increase, he was told to use that amount to take his wife to dinner. He noted he was told the people of Enfield can’t afford a tax increase.
He stated his definition of a new car is one that is less than five years old. He questioned why 80% of the cars are new, but the owners can’t afford to support education. He questioned why the restaurant parking lots in town are full, and yet no one can afford to support education. He stated his answer to these questions is that education is de-valued because people simply don’t want to pay for it. He noted evidence of that attitude is due to a demographic shift where the population has gotten older. He stated he has heard empty nesters say, “I did my part, I paid my dues, I raised my kids, we built all these school buildings in town, now it’s someone else’s turn”. He stated that attitude simply destroys any sense of community that they think they have. He noted people with that attitude need to realize that their social security income and Medicare benefits result from the taxes paid by a well-educated, well-paid younger generation. He stated people should be paying now for education so that they can be supported tomorrow.
Mr. Woods stated he has also been told that unemployment is a concern relative to a tax increase. He noted if there’s a 10% unemployment level, 90% of the workforce is still employed.
He stated although the Board of Education decides how to spend the amount allocated to them, he challenges the Town Council to go back to their respective Republican and Democrat caucuses and tell the Board members that the Council will support the reinstatement of the $1.5 million dollar reduction recently proposed by the Board majority.
Mr. Woods concluded stating, “we are Americans, and when times are tough, we don’t give up. We don’t lament what others – the State of the Feds - can’t or won’t do. We pick ourselves up by our bootstraps because we live here. We don’t live in Hartford or Washington. We are Enfield.”
Megan Maloney, 8 Pilgrim Circle (Parkman School student)
Stated her belief families shouldn’t have to pay for sports at JFK or at the high schools. She noted without sports, students will become overweight. She stated all families pay taxes, and students should not be at a disadvantage.
Jessica Duga, 101 Cottage Road
Stated last spring Mayor Kaupin was asked in an interview in front of Lego what his favorite thing was about Enfield. She noted he responded, “Enfield has a great educational system”. She questioned if a great educational system exists if there are classes with 27 to 31 students, which is proposed for the upcoming school year. She noted her son is in a sixth grade class of 27 students. She pointed out if only half of the students in that class need two minutes of the teacher’s time to have something explained, that’s 30 minutes out of her day, and she doesn’t have 30 minutes out of her day because she has to be teaching for all of the testing they are doing. She noted it takes a long time to help students grasp concepts. She stated some students may be ahead or behind the curve. She noted someone will be left out no matter what because the classes are too big.
Ms. Duga stated Enfield needs to give enough money to the Board of Education so that they can pay to have enough teachers so they don’t have classes this large. She noted large elementary classes across the board is unacceptable. She questioned what happens in the lower grades if students are struggling to learn to read in a large classroom, and the teacher doesn’t have time to give them individual attention. She pointed out they have a great program called, “TLC”, and it doesn’t cost that much money, and that program is on the chopping block. She questioned what will happen to TLC students who receive a little attention so that they do learn how to read and thrive in the classroom. She noted if they don’t get that individual attention, they will be below the curve and continue that way going on into the upper grades. She noted in high school those students will become frustrated and drop out. She reminded the Council that Representative Jarmoc stated that 50% to 80% of community college entrants need remedial learning. She questioned if these are the kinds of students coming out of Enfield’s high schools. She pointed out this is not a great educational system if Enfield’s high school students need remedial attention in college. She stated this is unacceptable, and this is an educational system that needs to be fixed.
Ms. Duga read an e-mail she received from John Fisher of 173 Oldefield Farms. She noted Mr. Fisher is a retired middle school teacher who taught for 32 years at JFK Middle School.
“Your children’s future is the best investment any town, state, or country can make. That future means getting a quality education. The result of that investment is young people who become productive, tax-paying citizens who make worthwhile contributions to their communities. One of the first and most important things a prospective homebuyer looks at in a town is the quality of its schools. It seems penny-wise and pound foolish to trim your budget at the expense of your school system. Better home values mean increased revenue. Small class sizes are probably the most important factor in a quality education. It allows each student the attention they need and deserve for personal and academic growth. Cutting sports not only effects the quality of life for kids now and in their adult lives, but sometimes sports can be a ticket to college. Kids need a physical outlet to balance the other demands on their lives. What better way than with organized sports. Athletic programs also serve as a way of keeping less academically inclined students engaged and interested in school. Many lessons that students learn on the playing field and as a member of a team are an invaluable part of their development. And, finally, AP classes not only speak to the quality of the school system, but can be a real money saver for many students going to college. Schools too often are forced to spend money on special needs students at the expense of their gifted and talented constituents. AP courses are one small but significant way of encouraging academic excellence. I was proud to teach in Enfield. When I was there, I could tell that the Town cared and wanted the best for their kids. They seemed always to be moving forward in the direction of providing a quality education. I regret that I cannot say that now. Let’s get back to putting our kids first.”
Ms. Duga concluded urging the Council reconsider the budget submitted to the Council by the Board of Education and provide enough money so that they can provide a quality education so they can have a great education system.
Carrie Barnes, 5 South Meadow Lane
Stated she’s the parent of four boys, ages two to 12. She noted she graduated from Enfield High School in 1987 and from Central in 1991 with a BS in Accounting. She noted she and her husband value education, and they value education enough to pay for it. She stated they are both closely involved in their children’s education, and they’re not relying solely on Enfield Public Schools to educate their children. She noted they regularly search for holes in their education and they cover those holes at home.
She urged the Council approve the professionally prepared budget that Dr. Gallacher originally prepared before the $1.5 million dollar cut. She urged the Council to stop holding the Board of Education hostage to their agenda.
Ms. Barnes questioned if a tax freeze is fiscally conservative. She noted she’s aware this is a Republican-controlled Council and Republicans are historically conservative, both fiscally and socially. She stated while a tax freeze is fiscally conservative, she feels it’s shallow thinking and extremely shortsighted to believe that. She suggested a tax freeze that paralyzes the public school system and even sends it backward is some of the worst liberalism that exists. She stated her belief it’s conservative to well-educate young children and send them off into society. She noted if they under-educate children, they’re fanning the flame of liberalism and setting these children up for the welfare system.
She stated as she looks at the make-up of the Town Council, she sees many well-spoken and presumably well educated individuals. She assumed all Council members benefited from a worthwhile education, whether it is in Enfield or another town. She assumed if Council members are well educated they then understand the value of a good education. She pointed out the Town Council is making decisions that are crippling the educational system in the Town of Enfield.
Ms. Barnes stated her belief the Town Council has found a successful platform in the Town of Enfield in order to win elections, and that platform is “don’t raise taxes”. She noted the Council has found that there are more voting retirees and people more focused on their wallets than anything else than there are voting parents in the Town of Enfield. She stated Council members can win elections on this platform, and they have. She noted there’s a disconnect between what is known to be right and true and what they have to do in order to win an election. She stated she imagines this goes on everyday in D.C. and Hartford. She questioned if being on the Town Council or being Mayor in Enfield is so important that they would sacrifice what is known to be true and sacrifice their own values so that they can hold a seat in Town government.
Ms. Barnes concluded urging the Council do the right thing in this budget process. She noted even if a Council member loses the election, they’d know they did right by the children of Enfield in 2010.
Susan Hart, 5 Cynthia Circle
Stated she is a staunch and complete advocate for public education in Enfield. She urged the Council reconsider and accept Dr. Gallacher’s 3.4% budget.
Ms. Hart stated she and her husband are deeply in the process of leaving Enfield. She noted she will be leaving Enfield because she has begged multiple administrations to please increase her taxes to keep quality education. She referred to the last speaker’s comment about the majority party’s platform concerning no new taxes. She stated this works for the majority party, so “here we are”, even though she believes it’s doing massive damage.
She noted she has come before the Council for several years about these issues, however, she has to accept that Enfield can’t or won’t be the town she knows her kids need.
Robert Tkacz, Bernadino Avenue
Stated the word for this budget session is reality. He noted they wouldn’t have the problems in the school budget if the Enfield Teachers’ Association decided to rescind their raises. He stated since they have to pay the teachers more money, and they’re not interested in helping the community for a better education, there’s a problem.
As concerns the quality of education in Enfield, Mr. Tkacz noted there’s a survey out called ConnCan and Enfield rates above Somers, Windsor Locks, Vernon, Windsor and East Windsor as well as the state average. He stated everyone is saying education is going down in Enfield, however, the surveys keep showing Enfield’s status increases, and the budget is flat.
Mr. Tkacz stated a California school system has class sizes jumping from 20 to 30 at the elementary level unless the parents provide $3 million dollars to keep class sizes down. He noted across the nation, parents are being asked to put money into the school system.
He stated his belief people don’t understand how the school budget works or how the Town Council works with the school system. He pointed out the work the Town does for the school system, over and above the budget. For 2009/2010, the Town Council, out of their budget, over and above the school budget, bought $100,000 worth of books, and they contributed $235,000 to the science labs. In 2008/2009, they bought $150,000 worth of computers; $150,000 of textbooks, and additionally, in 2008/2009, the Council appropriated $340,000 in Special Revenue Funds for special education and grant writing.
Mr. Tkacz referred to all the services the Town provides for the schools – how they help the library, provide for police at celebrations and events at the schools, police within the schools, and crossing guards come out of the Town budget. He noted the Town provides many services. He pointed out in the 2008/2009 fiscal year, the Town helped the school system by $3.4 million dollars and in 2009/2010, the Town Council supported the system by over $11 million dollars in additional funding. He noted the Town took over maintenance for the schools.
He stated people accuse the Town Council of not caring about education, and they’re totally wrong. He noted people need to be educated about how the Town Council runs the whole Town of Enfield.
As concerns class sizes across America, Mr. Tkacz pointed out Kentucky has an average class size of over 40, and the class sizes in many states are over 30. He stated in Enfield, if someone isn’t happy with 27 to 30 students in a class, a parent can redistrict to another school where the class size is lower. He pointed out there’s a disparity in class sizes at the nine elementary schools. He stated his belief Enfield can close two elementary schools and the middle school and still function.
Dominick Alaimo, 16 New Street
Stated his belief the Town Council has done a wonderful job holding the line. He questioned the same cost for education when the enrollment is dropping.
Mr. Alaimo stated only about 50 people showed up for this meeting when it was hoped 500 to 1,000 would show up.
He encouraged the Council to keep doing the job they’re doing, but just be fair.
Susan Brown, 17 Light Street
Stated it would be a heartbreaking decision to leave Enfield. She noted her son gets straight A’s and will be attending JFK Middle School next year. She stated the Town isn’t offering anything to keep families in town.
As concerns class sizes, Ms. Brown pointed out there are issues nowadays that they didn’t have in the past, i.e., students being pulled from classrooms for remedial help or counseling. She voiced concern about good students actually getting bored because there’s nothing for those students in a class of 30.
Melissa Torres, 177 Spring Street Ext.
Stated there are people that want the mill rate to go up so they can support education. She noted she tried to sell her house because she didn’t feel education is going in the right direction, but she can’t sell it so she’s stuck here.
Ms. Torres urged the Council to increase taxes a little to help education. She noted her son is in the TLC program, and she imagines him lost in large class sizes.
Susan Mercik-Davis, 8 Iroquois Road
Stated she’s an Enfield native and attended school here. She noted she graduated from Fermi High School and received a four-year scholarship to Boston University. She pointed out she received this scholarship through field hockey, which was offered through athletics at Fermi High. She stated she then went on to attain Master’s and Doctorate’s degrees. She noted she moved back to Enfield, and teaches at a Springfield college. She stated she has three children, and she does not believe education is now what it was when she was attending school in Enfield. She noted she moved back to Enfield because her family was here, and she received a great education in this town.
She stated they need to make the school system more efficient by redistricting and restructuring. She noted tough decisions have to be made, i.e., closing a school. She stated if this results in providing children a better education, then it should happen. She noted the Town needs to adapt the school system to the children, or else they are failing them.
She referred to Mr. Tkacz’s comments and stated teachers have to take some responsibility in this. She noted the teacher’s contract has to be reviewed. She pointed out people aren’t getting raises in this economy, and the teachers have to take some responsibility for that if their union leaders will allow them to do this. She stated teachers need to take a stand.
Ms. Mercik-Davis stated Enfield does not have a better school system than Somers. Somers has graduating students that are going onto colleges in the ranges of 86%, and Enfield is up 60%, and that’s a huge difference. She noted like the Hart family, they are researching school systems in other towns because they’re seriously considering leaving Enfield.
Maureen Brennan, 11 Sandpiper Road
Stated the Board of Education made a big mistake when they submitted their budget of $1.24%. She noted they’re not even sure how that looks. She stated some Board members only had minutes to review the budget before that vote, and that budget is now in the hands of the Council.
Ms. Brennan stated the budget she believes the Council should approve is the only one that the whole Board agreed upon. She quoted from the Board of Education Special Meeting on February 17th - “Board member Judith Apruzzese-Desroches asked her peers if the Superintendent’s proposed budget at this point is acceptable to everyone. The Board agreed that everything offered in the proposed budget is acceptable.” Ms. Brennan pointed out this was Dr. Gallacher’s original proposed budget, which includes many cuts and an increase of about 3.4%. The cuts that will result from the Board of Education proposed budget number of 1.24% will be damaging to the school system and Enfield.
She stated when she asked some Council members why do they feel education should be cut as much as possible, the answer is often, “we need to force change by starving the system”. She pointed out “there are over 6,000 kids there while you starve it”. She noted it’s not okay to do it this way. She stated the Town has to find a better way, and they have to work with people. She noted the town will not move forward until they work through the lack of trust and the lack of priority on education. She stated it’s actually not fiscally responsible to do some of these things that will result in a low budget for education. They will pay in remedial help for children, and they’ll pay in prison systems and judicial systems.
Ms. Brennan stated she has been told many times that the Council doesn’t trust the Board of Education or their administrators. She noted this has to be worked out because the students have to stop paying the price for politics and distrust.
She stated the Council has been told that Enfield’s per pupil expenditure is $14,500. She noted she went to the State of Connecticut Strategic Profile and learned Enfield’s per pupil expenditure compared to the State average. She pointed out for elementary and middle school students, Enfield spends $8,871, and the state average is $9,520. At the high school level, Enfield pays $8,800, and the state average is $10,742. She stated Enfield pays for Special Education costs at the private schools in town and for their busing. She noted not all the money in the budget goes to public school education. She stated when the school system is paying $250,000 for one student, the average is thrown off.
Ms. Brennan stated there’s no vision, and there are knee jerk actions. She noted the community doesn’t understand and they react, and politics comes into play, and there’s no progress.
She pointed out in 2007, there was a recommendation to buy software that would help busing and redistricting. She noted the Board of Education was told that the IT Department would have to buy this software, however, it wasn’t purchased. She noted last December there was a great presentation on a software product that would help with redistricting, the school system would move forward, money would be saved, education might be improved, however, the Town decided not to get the software.
Ms. Brennan stated the Town Council and Board of Education have to start working together. She urged the Council support Dr. Gallcher’s budget for this year.
Robert Tkacz, Bernadino Avenue
Stated in the 1980’s, Enfield had class sizes of 30 to 35. He noted by the early 1990’s, Connecticut came out with testing, and Enfield had one of the highest test scores in the state. He stated there was a theory over the years that smaller class sizes will increase test scores. He noted over the years and across the nation, the smaller class sizes got the worst test scores. He stated in the ConnCan survey, Enfield is above Somers as far as rating is concerned. He noted at the end of the year, the school system bought the software for bus routing, not for redistricting the schools.
Mr. Tkacz stated the budget is a reality, and not a predictor of house values in a community. He noted if they raise taxes, there will be less people paying taxes and less revenue. He stated they need to keep the budget level so that people still in the community have the ability to pay.
Chairman Kaupin requested the website address for ConnCan. Mr. Tkacz responded www.conncan.org/learn.
COUNCILMEN COMMUNICATIONS & PETITIONS
Councilman Hall expressed her appreciation for everyone coming out to express their opinions tonight. She noted there’s a lot of conversation that has to take place between the Council and the Board of Education, and that process hasn’t formally started.
Councilman Bosco questioned whether they can get the sign done for East Coast Fencing.
Councilman Bosco questioned if the trash was picked up on Colonial Road. He also requested an update on Burnham Street.
Councilman Nelson stated the public can also speak on the budget at the Public Hearing. He stated his feeling that the parents who really care are present this evening. He noted there are a lot of parents that don’t help their children. He suggested perhaps there should be a meeting with all the parents. He noted some of the parents should start pulling the weight with their own children. As concerns those children pulled from classes everyday, he noted perhaps there should be a little more parenting at home instead of the school having to take time from the average or above average learners. He stated it’s also the responsibility of the parents to step up and help out in this economic time.
MOTION #793 by Councilman Nelson, seconded by Councilman to move Items A1-A3, D and E to Miscellaneous.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #793 adopted 7-0-0. Councilman Bosco absent at the vote.
MOTION #794 by Councilman Nelson, seconded by Councilman Hall to add an item regarding the North Central Health District and the idea of adding a methadone clinic in the Town of Enfield.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #794 adopted 7-0-0. Councilman Bosco absent at the vote.
Councilman Dumont stated the Council does listen to speakers who come before them. She expressed her appreciation to those people who spoke this evening.
Councilman Dumont stated the Women’s Club of Enfield will be having their Arts Festival on Friday, March 26th from 7:00 to 9:00 p.m. and Saturday, March 27th from noon to 3:00 p.m. at Enfield High School cafeteria. She noted there will also be a music program in the auditorium.
Councilman Dumont stated people have asked her when the curbside yard waste will begin.
Councilman Dumont questioned where and how people will register their alarms.
Councilman Keller stated the Patriot Award Committee is still accepting applications, which can be found at the Town Hall, Post Office and Library. He noted people can get more information by contacting him by e-mail.
Councilman Lee stated Northeast Utilities, through the Connecticut Energy Efficiency Fund Program, is continuing to sponsor home energy usage audits. He noted this is about a $700 value that they’re currently providing to residents at a $25.00 cost. He stated there is a limited time on this program, and this particular round expires the end of March. He noted these vouchers can be found in the lobby of Town Hall. He stated Northeast Utilities would come in and conduct an audit, help residents with certain immediate improvements, and they leave the resident with a voucher for additional services if needed, and this would be at a discount. He referred to the website, ctenergyinfo.com will provide more details.
Councilman Hall stated she had a couple e-mails and phone calls regarding the alarm ordinance. She questioned where is the Town informing people about the new ordinance besides E-TV and the Town’s website. She noted there was some concern about false alarms and those people not even knowing about the new ordinance and being hit with a fine the very first time. She questioned if they can do more to get the word out about this new alarm ordinance. She questioned if they’re fining people, and they don’t pay the fine, is there a state fine that kicks in. She stated her understanding the state fine is less than the Town’s fine.
Chairman Kaupin referred to speakers this evening and noted he appreciates dialog. As regards a comment about distrust between the Board and Council, he pointed out many Board members are good friends, and there’s no distrust between these bodies. He noted there may be different philosophies, or different avenues to go in a certain direction. He acknowledged people are free to speak their mind, however, people shouldn’t go negative from the start because that spirals the whole conversation because people listening or watching on TV will automatically think there’s distrust between the Council and Board. He pointed out everyone is committed to serving the community, the schools, and neighbors.
Chairman Kaupin stated he received a letter from a woman in Oregon who is looking for a recipe for a favorite low sodium or no salt added recipe. He noted this woman is trying to collect these recipes from across the country. He stated this woman is undertaking this project because of a medical condition that she and her family have which requires they have a diet such as this. She wants to collect these recipes and share them with the rest of the country. He suggested if anyone listening would like to submit a recipe on behalf of the Town of Enfield, they may do so by forwarding it to him or the Town Manager’s office at 820 Enfield Street, and they will forward the recipes to the lady in Oregon.
Chairman Kaupin stated on March 4th, he was invited to the American Red Cross Connecticut Chapter 2010 Heroes of Northern and Eastern Connecticut. He noted Enfield received the Firefighters’ Award for Captain Donald Ellis, Jr., Christopher Ellis, Lt. Brian Ellis and Brian Ayers from the Enfield Fire District. He explained this was for their heroic efforts in saving a woman who drove into the Connecticut River. He noted they had to use the hovercraft to rescue her from her car. He congratulated these men for their great work on behalf of the Town of Enfield.
Chairman Kaupin stated Olivia Longey recently had a birthday party for her 7th birthday. He noted Olivia told everyone to bring supplies for the troops instead of bringing her presents. He read a letter from Olivia: “Dear Mayor Kaupin, thank you for the donation for my birthday gift. I had a good day with my friends. I sent three care packages that were 102 pounds to three soldiers overseas.” Chairman Kaupin thanked Olivia for what she does for this community.
Chairman Kaupin stated before the meeting, he met with Eric Grine who is with the Maciolek Post 154, and they’re holding their annual banquet on May 21st. He noted they have an ad book which they produce. He stated Eric gave him a business card and form for each of the members of the Council. He urged everyone support the Maciolek Post with an ad, which costs $25.00 for quarter page, $50.00 for a half page, and $100 for a full page. Mr. Grine wants these in by mid-April so that they can print this book.
Chairman Kaupin stated over the weekend, he had a meeting with the Enfield Police Explorer Post 820. He noted he met with Monica and Scott Owen at the Home Show, and the Enfield Police Explorer’s Post would like to bring the Explorers to a national conference in Atlanta. He stated they are doing fundraising for this purpose. He noted the academy is in July, and they will have an opportunity to compete against police explorer posts from all over the United States. He pointed out the Enfield Police Explorers put in approximately 5,000 hours of community service each year. He noted people can get in touch with him if they wish to make a donation toward this fundraiser.
Chairman Kaupin stated every year the Beautification Committee sponsors a Clean Sweep, and this year this event is scheduled for Saturday, April 17th. He noted to sign up or donate, people can go to enfieldcleansweep.org or call Darren Ketchale at 860-698-9748.
TOWN MANAGER REPORT & COMMUNICATIONS
As concerns the alarm ordinance, Mr. Coppler explained people will be registering their alarms through the Police Department. He noted there will be a form on the website and at the Police Department. He stated if the fine isn’t paid, a citation is issued. He noted the state citation is less than the fine. He noted they would keep track of these cases, and at a certain point the town could go through small claims if someone isn’t paying their fine. He stated they will get the word out about the new alarm ordinance through the Town’s website, E-TV, press releases in the newspaper, and they’re sending a letter to the alarm companies. He noted the Town would like to get information from the alarm companies so the Town can contact those people directly.
Mr. Coppler stated yard waste pick-up begins March 26th.
Referring to 17 Burnham Street, Mr. Coppler stated the resident has been contacted and will be meeting with the Director of Planning.
Mr. Copper stated the Council has before them the update regarding sidewalk clearing citations as well as the budget session schedule going forward starting with March 22nd up to budget adoption on May 18th.
Mr. Vindigni stated the Town was approached by Fermi High senior, Dan Army, who is an art student at Fermi High. He noted Mr. Army asked if he could do a wall mural at one of the Town facilities as part of a community service project. It was proposed doing this mural at the Angelo Lamagna Neighborhood Activity Center above the entranceway to the gymnasium, and the mural would have a recreation sports theme. Mr. Army will take care of the supplies for this mural. He noted the Council has a depiction of this mural. They are looking for a consensus from the Council to go forward with this mural.
It was the consensus of the Council to go forward with the mural at the Lamagna Center.
Councilman Nelson requested information about how people might go about donating land to the Town of Enfield. He suggested perhaps they could list on the Town’s website some incentives for donating land to the town, i.e., tax incentives.
Councilman Nelson stated his belief the Police Explorers do a great job. He noted this is a group of kids who are actually out there working for their dreams.
Chairman Kaupin requested a CIP update. Mr. Coppler noted he’s working to update this information.
TOWN ATTORNEY REPORT & COMMUNICATIONS
Attorney Elsden stated she had no formal report this evening.
REPORT OF SPECIAL COMMITTEES OF THE COUNCIL
There were no reports.
OLD BUSINESS
APPOINTMENTS (TOWN COUNCIL & TOWN MANAGER)
All appointments remained tabled.
Items C, D and E remained tabled.
NEW BUSINESS
NOMINATION #795 by Councilman Nelson to appoint Mary Ann Turner (R) to the North Central District Health Department for a term which expires 6/30/2012.
MOTION #796 by Councilman Dumont, seconded by Councilman Nelson to close nominations.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #796 adopted 8-0-0.
Upon a ROLL-CALL vote being taken, the Chair declared Mary Ann Turner appointed to the North Central District Health Department by an 8-0-0 vote.
RESOLUTION #797 by Councilman Lee, seconded by Councilman Hall.
WHEREAS, the Town of Enfield has received funds under the Connecticut Small Cities Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program, administered by the State of Connecticut, Department of Economic and Community Development, pursuant to Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 as amended; and
WHEREAS, the Town of Enfield has expended those funds pursuant to Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, the Code of Federal Regulations, and the Assistant Agreement; and
WHEREAS, those funds received by the Town of Enfield have generated Program Income;
WHEREAS, Title 24, Part 570, Section 489(e) of the Code of Federal Regulations prescribes conditions for the use of Program Income.
WHEREAS, Program Income is governed by Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974.
WHEREAS, Program Income may only be used for the following activities:
(a) an activity that generates the program income, assuming such activity continues to meet the requirements of Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974;
(b) any additional activity that meets the requirements of Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act, assuming the Town receives written approval form DECD to fund it with Program Income.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT
1. The Town of Enfield may use Program Income to fund Administrative and program soft costs not to exceed the following percentage:
Administrative Costs 16%
Total Administrative and Program Soft Costs 25%
(Housing Rehabilitation Activities Only)
Total Administrative and Program Soft Costs 21%
(All Activities Except for Housing Rehabilitation)
2. The Town of Enfield hereby amends the Program Income Plan(s) adopted
by the Council in Resolution No. 9734 in 2008 for the original activity that generated Program Income to permit the funding of additional activities from that Program Income.
Mr. Bryanton stated the Town runs various loan programs with CDBG funds, and those programs produce program income, and this is done through revolving loan payments. He noted in order to re-use those loan payments, they need a Program Income Reuse Plan, and they have to update that plan periodically. He stated they’re changing this plan at this time because of the handout he just gave the Council.
Mr. Bryanton stated the Town has an Enfield Community Development Corporation, and this corporation was created in 1985 to primarily do construction of scattered site affordable homes in Enfield. He noted this is a non-profit corporation set up to undertake projects that would have been ineligible for the Town to carry out at the time. He noted this program went dormant in 1991. He stated program income was generated from the loans produced by that program, and the money was put in an interest-bearing account. He noted the ECDC is still in existence today, and it consists of members of the Town Council.
He stated the State requires that these funds be accounted for in a grantee quarterly report and substantially drawn down annually for eligible projects. He noted adding the ECDC funds to the Program Reuse Plan will address the State’s requirements. He stated when the Reuse Plan is approved by the State, the Town may proceed with the reinstitution of the ECDC as a community-based organization. He noted a local attorney has been retained to rewrite the corporation documents and assist with the transfer of membership to a community-based organization. He stated the reinstitution of the ECDC could take place within the next two months. He noted documents and a presentation will be prepared to explain the proposed changes at a meeting of the corporation’s Board of Directors who are the Town Council. He stated that Board must vote to enact the changes to the corporation’s bylaws. He noted essentially, they have a good sum of money sitting in this account, and it has to be accounted for, and the State says something must be done with this money, or the Town will lose it. He stated they re-did the Program Income Plan, and this is before the Council to be voted upon.
Councilman Dumont stated she notices that the ECDC is to develop affordable housing throughout the Town of Enfield, and Mr. Bryanton responded that was the charge, however, the proposal is to change that charge to acquire and dispose of properties within the Town of Enfield, which is something they do not do now. Councilman Dumont clarified that is for the whole Town of Enfield, not just one section, and Mr. Bryanton responded that’s correct.
Councilman Lee stated the Revitalization Strategy Committee has been working with Mr. Bryanton’s office, and they have a subcommittee that’s tasked with generating a strategy to recharge the ECDC once this paperwork is done. He noted this process has been underway for about a year. He stated this puts them in good standing with the State and allows them to free up these funds.
Upon a ROLL-CALL vote being taken, the Chair declared RESOLUTION #797 adopted 8-0-0.
ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION
CONNECTICUT RIVER ACCESS PROJECT
Mr. Coppler stated a number of years ago, the Town received an earmark to provide access to the old dam area on the Connecticut River. He noted about $3 million dollars was given to the Town for this project. He stated the Council gave their authorization to move forward with the preliminary engineering to provide alternatives on what could be done and the associated costs.
Present for this discussion was Director of Public Works, Piya Hawkes and John Schmitz, Senior Engineer with BL Companies in Meriden, Connecticut.
Mr. Hawkes stated Alternative #3 was chosen, which would use South River Street as the entrance way. He noted the project would start at the end of South River Street, and the trail would meander south under the Route 190 bridge and toward the old dam.
Mr. Schmitz gave a power point presentation of the different options for a Connecticut River access project. He noted the goal is to provide safe pedestrian access to the riverfront as well as provide an adequate and safe parking facility.
He then reviewed the approximate costs for the different options as follows:
· Option 1 (off Birch Street on State land) - $2.3 million dollars
· Option 2 (similar to Option 1 with two stair towers - $3 million dollars
· Option 3 (South River Street) - $1.6 million dollars
· Option 4 (St. Bernard’s property) - $3.2 million dollars
· Option 5 (Pearl Street) - $2.1 million dollars
Mr. Schmitz pointed out these costs do not include land acquisition costs.
Mr. Hawkes stated so far, all the costs have been in-house.
Councilman Lee questioned what kind of match is required from the community. Mr. Hawkes stated his belief it’s an 80-20 split.
Councilman Hall questioned what the residents prefer. Mr. Hawkes stated at the first public informational meeting, they presented the first three options, and the residents were in favor of Option #3. Mr. Coppler pointed out when they are talking about residents, they’re not necessarily talking about those people adjacent to the different options.
Councilman Hall questioned if this has been presented to South River Street residents. Mr. Coppler stated the second informational meeting had a larger turnout by residents, which generated some other ideas. Mr. Hawkes stated the majority of the residents at the second meeting were adamant they did not want Option #3, and some people wanted the money returned to the federal government. He noted after that meeting, they looked at the parking across the street from the Pearl Street library and St. Bernards. He went on to note the South River Street residents sent in a petition, which included a total of 111 people against Option #3. He noted approximately 40 people lived on South River Street, and the remainder was from other parts of town and outside of town.
Councilman Hall questioned what parcel of land on Option #3 would need to be purchased. Mr. Schmitz responded three parcels of land would be required for that option.
Councilman Hall stated South River Street is very narrow, and Option #3 would substantially increase traffic down that street. She questioned whether the Town took into consideration any road widening or repairing. Mr. Schmitz stated that road currently doesn’t meet town-road standards.
Councilman Edgar stated the petition included all but two residents of South River Street, and the only reason those two people weren’t included was because they weren’t available to sign the petition at that time. He noted those two people were adamantly opposed to this project. He stated that road would need to be repaired. He noted some of the homes come right up to the road. He stated Amtrak owns some land on the other side of the road. He stated to go forward with Option #3, they’d have to acquire property, and there’s a definite possibility of having to go for eminent domain. He noted one of the residents brought up the fact that there are eagles and beavers in this area. He questioned whether the Army Corps of Engineers has to be involved. He stated he is adamantly opposed to Option #3. He stated he’s aware of only one or two people in favor of this project, and those people are the fisherman who first started this idea. He noted some people would rather see this entire thing scrapped than going through South River Street. He pointed out the other costs not stated tonight are the costs for acquisition of land, which can be expensive, and going to eminent domain would be more expensive.
Councilman Bosco stated it’s a beautiful plan, but there’s the question of whether the Town can afford this. He noted he can’t see this project right now.
Mr. Coppler stated there have been a lot of people from the federal level inquiring about this money. He noted they want to see this project move forward, or the appropriation should be returned.
Councilman Bosco questioned whether this area would have to be maintained all year long, and Mr. Coppler stated this area would be treated like any other park, therefore, the Town would have to provide access.
Councilman Nelson stated this was a very well done presentation. He questioned how much money is in the CIP, and Mr. Coppler responded about $120,000.
Councilman Nelson stated he can’t see spending money on this project when money is needed for education. He stated his understanding the Provencher family has owned that property for many years, and they’re not happy about this. He noted they have to consider the people who live on that street.
Chairman Kaupin questioned whether any of the other options were acceptable to DOT. Mr. Hawkes stated they showed DOT all the options, and they’re recommendation was to go with Option #3.
Chairman Kaupin stated he has a big concern about South River Street. He noted he attended the October public informational meeting, and Councilman Edgar was present as well. He stated his belief a project such as this requires neighborhood support to move forward. He went on to note if they spend up to $3.4 million dollars for this project, the Town’s share would be a max of $680,000. He pointed out that’s 68% of the CIP budget for a year. He noted the constraints financially won’t allow this project to move forward at that expense. He stated the South River Street concept is nice, but this is a narrow road, and they never want to do eminent domain to a very nice piece of property that a family has maintained over the years.
Councilman Nelson suggested looking at Option #5 again since it has less impact. He went on to question whether money can be taken out of this grant to pay for engineering and design, and Mr. Hawkes stated it would have been necessary to sign an agreement with DOT prior to the engineering and design work.
Chairman Kaupin stated this item will remain on the agenda for further discussion at the next meeting.
DISCUSSION RE: NORTH CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT AND THE METHADONE CLINIC
Mr. Coppler stated the Town received a letter about partnering with the District about a methadone clinic at the site of where the North Central District Health Department is located. He stated after discussions with North Central District Health, he doesn’t believe there are a lot of “legs” to this. He noted he will be at the Wednesday night meeting concerning this to learn where this is going.
Councilman Hall questioned Mr. Blitz’s position on this. Mr. Coppler stated the Health Department has a lot of issues that they have to deal with. He noted they have a list of priorities they have to address.
Councilman Hall questioned whether it’s necessary for the Town Council to send a letter in opposition to the methadone clinic. Mr. Coppler indicated he will know more on Thursday. Councilman Hall suggested perhaps Mr. Coppler can relay the Council’s opposition verbally.
Councilman Bosco stated the last thing needed in Thompsonville is a methadone clinic very close to the Lamagna Center.
Councilman Nelson questioned if this meeting is open to the public, and Mr. Coppler stated his belief it is. Councilman Nelson stated if this meeting is open to the public, he suggested residents show up and speak their mind at the meeting. He stated his belief the best place for a methadone clinic would be at Somers Prison so that people will see where they’ll end up if they don’t change their ways.
Councilman Nelson stated his belief this is totally a step in the wrong direction. He noted he’s shocked that the Director of the Health Department would even consider this.
Councilman Edgar stated he won’t be able to attend the Wednesday meeting, but he requests his opposition be expressed regarding this. He noted he’s somewhat familiar with the methadone clinic in Hartford, and Enfield definitely doesn’t need problems here.
Councilman Nelson questioned if there can be a consensus from the Council that if the District Health Department does this, which would be against the recommendation of the Council, the Town of Enfield will give them the notice they’re done.
Councilman Keller stated he also will not be able to attend the Wednesday night meeting. He requested his concerns about this be raised as well.
Chairman Kaupin stated this item will remain on the agenda, and the Town Manager can provide an update at the next meeting.
MISCELLANEOUS
MOTION #798 by Councilman Lee, seconded by Councilman Keller to approve the Consent Agenda.
Transfer $3,000 Building & Grounds Maintenance Safety Training
Transfer $2,500 Temporary Compliance Clerk
Transfer $2,000 Advertising CDA
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #798 adopted 8-0-0.
RESOLUTION #799 by Councilman Nelson, seconded by Councilman Hall.
RESOLVED, that in accordance with Chapter VI, Section 8(f) of the Town Charter, the following transfer is hereby made:
TO: Capital Improvement Program
Municipal Facilities 0310-01-2010-3400-08110-0450 $227,979.41
FROM: Capital Improvement Program
FHS Field Rehabilitation 0310-01-2006/2007-3100-08804-0450 $ 7,116.76
JFK School Drainage 0310-01-1999/2008-3200-08311-0450 $ 51,704.00
Fletcher Road Repairs 0310-01-2008-3200-08330-0450 $ 7,736.48
Booth Road Rehabilitation 0310-01-2007-3200-08535-0450 $ 24,533.14
Town Hall Site Improvements 0310-01-2003-3400-08114-0450 $ 889.03
School Window Replacement 0310-01-2006-0001-08148-0450 $ 70,000.00
School Roof Replacement 0310-01-2005/2006-0001-08155-0450 $ 66,000.00
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the above-stated funds are available as of March 5, 2010.
/s/ A. Lynn Nenni, Director of Finance
Present for this discussion were Piya Hawkes, Director of Public Works and Peter Luchini from LMG Consulting Engineers Inc.
Mr. Hawkes stated he would like to upgrade the HVAC system at the Police Department. He noted the current system is 19 years old, and it accommodates 21,000 square feet. He explained they have two boilers in the boiler room that are not accommodating the heat load requirements for that building.
He stated he solicited LMG to do a full evaluation of the HVAC system. He noted it’s being recommended they replace one of the primary boilers. He pointed out the Town had a brand new boiler, which was purchased by the School Department and was supposed to be used for the JFK Middle School pool, but it wasn’t code compliant. He noted that boiler was installed at the Police Department by in-house staff.
Mr. Hawkes explained other upgrades being proposed.
Mr. Luchini explained how the upgrades would work.
Councilman Nelson stated the Public Works Subcommittee is in agreement that this is the best way to go.
Councilman Edgar voiced his support of this.
Councilman Lee questioned what the windfall was concerning the boiler they used that was originally purchased for the JFK pool, and Mr. Hawkes responded $10,000.
Councilman Hall questioned the amount of energy that will be saved with the new system, and Mr. Luchini responded 15%.
Upon a ROLL-CALL vote being taken, the Chair declared RESOLUTION #799 adopted 8-0-0.
RESOLUTION #800 by Councilman Nelson, seconded by Councilman Hall.
WHEREAS, that the Town Council of the Town of Enfield values the opinions and comments of its constituents; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Chapter VI, Section 4, of the Enfield Town Charter, any elector or taxpayer may have an opportunity to be heard regarding appropriations for the ensuing fiscal year and for the purpose of being heard on issues of vital community importance and concern; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council shall conduct a public hearing at the Enrico Fermi High School Auditorium, 124 North Maple Street, Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 7:00 p.m.; and
RESOLVED, that the order of business of the 2010-2011 budget hearing be arranged as follows:
1. Presentation of the Town Manager’s Budget.
2. The Chairman of the Board of Education highlights Education Budget.
3. Comments from members of the public for the first time.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that each speaker be requested to register with the Town Clerk his name and address and that no speaker be allowed to speak more than five minutes each successive time the speaker’s name is called. Additionally, any speaker who has not registered with the Town Clerk will be allowed to speak only after those who have registered no longer wish to speak.
Mr. Coppler stated on March 29th at a location still to be determined at 7:00 p.m., there will be a community conversation on the budget that he proposed.
Upon a ROLL-CALL vote being taken, the Chair declared RESOLUTION #800 adopted 8-0-0.
ADJOURNMENT
MOTION #801 by Councilman Nelson, seconded by Councilman Keller to adjourn.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #801 adopted 8-0-0, and the meeting stood adjourned at 11:07 p.m.
Appended to minutes of 03/15/2010
Regular Town Council Meeting
ENFIELD TOWN COUNCIL
REQUEST FOR TRANSFER OF FUNDS
RESOLUTION NO. ________
RESOLVED, that in accordance with Chapter VI, Section 8(f) of the Town Charter, the following transfer is hereby made.
TO: 3400 Building & Grounds Maintenance
Professional Development 0100-01-0030-3400-00000-0322-70 $3,000.00
FROM: 3400 Building & Grounds Maintenance
Custodial Services 0100-01-0030-3400-00000-0423-00 $3,000.00
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the above-stated funds are available as of March 15, 2010.
A. Lynn Nenni, Director of Finance
APPROVED BY:________________________Town Manager Date:_________
ENFIELD TOWN COUNCIL
REQUEST FOR TRANSFER OF FUNDS
RESOLUTION NO. ________
RESOLVED, that in accordance with Chapter VI, Section 8(f) of the Town Charter, the following transfer is hereby made.
TO: Community Development
Temporary/Seasonal 0100-01-0060-6600-00000-0120-00 $2,500.00
FROM:
Official/Administrative 0100-01-0060-6600-00000-0310-00 $2,500.00
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the above-stated funds are available as of
March , 2010.
A. Lynn Nenni, Director of Finance
APPROVED BY:______________________Town Manager Date:_________
Appended to minutes of 03/15/2010
Regular Town Council Meeting
ENFIELD TOWN COUNCIL
REQUEST FOR TRANSFER OF FUNDS
RESOLUTION NO. ________
RESOLVED, that in accordance with Chapter VI, Section 8(f) of the Town Charter, the following transfer is hereby made.
TO: Advertising 0100-01-0060-6600-00000-0540-00 $2,000.00
FROM: Land & Building
Services 0100-01-0060-6600-00000-0335-00 $2,000.00
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the above-stated funds are available as of
March , 2010.
A. Lynn Nenni, Director of Finance
APPROVED BY:__________________________Town Manager Date:_________ |