|
ENFIELD TOWN COUNCIL
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 7, 2004
A Regular Meeting of the Enfield Town Council was called to order by Chairman Tallarita in the Council Chambers of the Enfield Town Hall, 820 Enfield Street, Enfield, Connecticut on Tuesday, September 7, 2004. The meeting was called to order at 7:36 p.m.
PRAYER - The Prayer was given by Councilman Mangini.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - The Pledge of Allegiance was said.
ROLL-CALL - Present were Councilmen Crowley, Edgar, Egan, Fiore, Kaupin, Mangini, Peruta, Reveruzzi, Tait and Tallarita. Councilmen Dodd was absent. Also present were Town Manager, Scott Shanley; Assistant Town Manger, Daniel Vindigni; Town Clerk, Suzanne Olechnicki; Town Attorney, Christopher Bromson; Director of Public Works, John Kazmarski; Deputy Director of Public Works, Geoffrey McAlmond
FIRE EVACUATION ANNOUNCEMENT
Chairman Tallarita made the fire evacuation announcement.
MINUTES OF PRECEDING MEETINGS
MOTION #7358 by Councilman Mangini, seconded by Councilman Edgar to accept the minutes of the August 16, 2004 Special Meeting.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #7358 adopted 7-0-3, with Councilmen Egan, Kaupin and Tait abstaining.
MOTION #7359 by Councilman Edgar, seconded by Councilman Mangini to accept the minutes of the August 16, 2004 Regular Meeting.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #7359 adopted 7-0-3, with Councilmen Egan, Kaupin, and Tait abstaining.
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS & PETITIONS
Mrs. Collins, Hazardville Section
Stated her belief people are losing their rights to speak and she doesn't want to go to a dictatorship form of government. She stated her hope Enfield isn't a corrupt town.
She urged Council members to use their microphones when speaking.
Margaret Jedziniak, 232 Abbe Road
Stated her belief there is a house numbering ordinance. She pointed out many homes in Enfield are not numbered. She suggested this ordinance be enforced.
Jack Sheridan, 7 Buchanan Road
Stated he did not see any Council members at a recent Planning & Zoning meeting when the new bank was discussed. He stated this is a beautiful building, however, he believes Planning & Zoning changed some regulations. He noted regulations require a 60-foot setback, and they approved 30 feet. He stated it requires that the building be a maximum of 24 feet, and they changed it to 44 feet. He added the buffer zone is 34 feet, and they changed it to 16 feet. He stated his belief Planning & Zoning approved all these items. He went on to state his main concern was the setback.
Mr. Sheridan stated the Planning & Zoning Chairman stated the Town was lucky to have a fine building such as this bank, and he also said it was better than having another car dealership. He pointed out if it had not been for the Planning & Zoning change in the regulations to allow car dealerships, they wouldn't have had them.
He questioned the status of the issue of the police locking up their guns. He pointed out if private citizens don't lock up their guns, they're held responsible for them.
Referring to the proposed Roads 2005 program, Mr. Sheridan noted they started out at $16,900,000 and then went onto $20 million, $22 million and now $24 million. He noted he listened to the recording of meeting minutes to learn exactly what was said because Council members question why he keeps saying the Council is trying to politicize this program. He noted it definitely sounds like that what's happened because their worried about the parochialism of having the wrong sections not be well represented with roads and to try and get the vote, they're concerned that it isn't spread over the town enough to get a uniform vote from everybody so that it passes. He feels this can't be denied because those were the words that were used.
COUNCILMEN COMMUNICATIONS & PETITIONS
Councilman Mangini stated the FAIR Steering Committee of the National League of Cities will convene in Long Beach this weekend and they will be looking at unfunded mandates imposed on municipalities by the federal government and they will be putting together resolutions to pass onto Congress. She noted a full report will be forthcoming.
Councilman Peruta referred to Parkman School playground and fencing and thanked Mr. Vindigni for his help with getting work done. He questioned if he can get an estimated completion date.
Councilman Peruta stated on Friday evening he spent eight hours with the Fire Department on Phoenix Avenue, Enfield Fire District #1. He noted this was a real eye opener in that there was a lot of activity with firemen testing equipment, generators, trucks were in and out, and they had drills. He added there were no calls. He urged other Council members to visit a fire district.
MOTION #7360 by Councilman Fiore, seconded by Councilman Mangini to suspend the rules to address under Miscellaneous Items 13c., d., e., f., and g., and to move Item 13b to 10a and 12b to 10b.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #7360 adopted 10-0-0.
Councilman Fiore stated he would like to see the Parkman School playground and fencing completed. He added his appreciation for the work that has been done.
Councilman Fiore questioned if last year's end-of-year expenditures are ready for closing. Mr. Shanley stated they should be about closed out. He added typically this is done between the middle to end of August. Councilman Fiore stated he would like a copy of all three divisions and the revenues whenever they're available.
Councilman Tait stated his belief the comments about parochialism and spreading the road work around were actually comments made by a member of the public, not a Council member at the last meeting when they discussed the Roads 2005 project. Mr. Shanley stated his belief Mr. Sheridan was talking about a different meeting.
Councilman Crowley referred to the setback of the bank on Enfield Street as mentioned by Mr. Sheridan and stated his belief the State has a 25-foot right-of-way, therefore, any type of widening done would still be on state property.
Councilman Crowley commended the Public Works staff for doing a great job with the sidewalk in front of Town Hall near the veterans' memorial.
Chairman Tallarita commended Town staff for doing a great job on the Town Green.
Chairman Tallarita requested the Town Manager check into the house numbering issue raised by Ms. Jedziniak.
As concerns the lost gun issue, Chairman Tallarita requested the Chief of Police attend the next meeting and explain what occurred and what type of action they're taking at the police department to rectify that problem in the future.
TOWN MANAGER REPORT & COMMUNICATIONS
Mr. Shanley stated he had no report this evening.
TOWN ATTORNEY REPORT & COMMUNICATIONS
Attorney Bromson stated he had no report this evening.
REPORTS OF SPECIAL COMMITTEES OF THE COUNCIL
There were no reports this evening.
DISCUSSION RE: TOWN FARM/POST OFFICE ROAD WITH DOT REPRESENTATIVES
Present for this discussion were Director of Public Works, John Kazmarski and Gus Colintino from the McGuire Group.
Mr. Kazmarski stated the DOT Representatives will be present at the September 21st Public Information Meeting to answer questions. He noted DOT will be talking about rights-of-way activities, and they will answer any questions that the public may have. He noted tonight they are providing the Council with an opportunity to see what the preliminary design investigations have resulted in.
He noted at both termini of the project, the Connecticut DOT wanted them to explore the use of roundabouts as a means of handling the traffic rather than stop conditions. He stated the one at Abbe Road was easy to dismiss because of the impact it would have on the abutting property owners and they felt that with just a minor realignment the site line at the intersection could be improved adequately and a roundabout wouldn't be necessary.
Mr. Kazmarski stated the intersection at the westerly end at Raffia Road was very complicated. He noted following the FHWA and the DOT criteria, the only way to make it work was to have two roundabouts. He stated that was designed, laid out and they discussed it at length. He noted they came to the conclusion this would cause all kinds of problems. He acknowledged technically it would work, however, every vehicle operator going through there would have to be cognizant of what was happening, where they were, follow the signs, etc. He stated they then had a lengthy discussion with DOT about the possibility of funding for a traffic signal at this intersection. He noted DOT directed them to go back and take a look at the prerequisites that have to be in place in order to fund a signal. He added DOT is working on this with them to see that the signal that is being called for at this location will be approved by their offices so that it's eligible for the state and federal funding under this project. He concluded pointing out the westerly termini at Raffia is now a cleaner layout of the intersection and the traffic will be controlled by a signal.
Mr. Colintino reviewed existing conditions, proposed construction, drainage and hydraulics, maintenance and protection of traffic, signals, cost and permits.
Chairman Tallarita stated he is concerned about the area where Wallop School Road comes onto Town Farm Road. He noted there is a historic home on the other side, and he knows of at least two occasions where cars have gone through that stop sign and ended up in the living room of that home. He questioned what can be done to rectify that problem. Mr. Colintino stated this issue is being addressed. He noted the existing intersection is a little skewed, and because it's skewed people don't feel it's necessary to slow down. He noted they end up losing control. He explained by doing a little realigning and making it a little more closer to 90 degrees with Town Farm Road, they force vehicles to slow down and stop at the stop sign. He stated this will avoid the house being struck if someone loses control. He noted instead, they'd end up in that driveway.
Chairman Tallarita stated there's a significant amount of property to the right of Wallop School Road and there's a significant amount of open space in that area. He questioned if it can be made possible to direct out-of-control cars into the open field as opposed to the driveway. Mr. Colintino explained if someone is really going to lose control of their car as they're making a left turn, they would end up in the driveway. He acknowledged there's a lot of room on the right side, but those are wetlands and if they move things to the left the skew is bigger and this would worsen the problem. Chairman Tallarita suggested enhancing this area for the public hearing since that resident may be raising this issue. Mr. Kazmarski stated they could look at putting in some evergreen plantings so that drivers heading north on that road will at least see the plantings and not envision nothing there. He noted just that visual attention getter should be enough to slow down a normal driver. Chairman Tallarita stated he would like to do anything they can to enhance visibility in that area so they can alleviate the resident's concern.
Councilman Fiore stated on May 4, 2001, the Town applied for a $2 million dollar STP urban fund grant. Mr. Shanley stated they applied for $2 million, but they didn't end up getting $2 million. He noted the actual amount they can apply to this particular project was about $1.6 million. Mr. Kazmarski clarified $1.6 million would be the Town portion. He pointed out they did get a $2 million dollar approval under CRCOG for an STP, but the Connecticut DOT kept 20% for their portion. Mr. Shanley pointed out they also got $1.25 million when Nancy Johnson was Congresswoman. He noted a combination of these two funds brings them close to $3 million dollars, which is why Roads 2005 includes $1 million for Post Office Road.
Councilman Fiore questioned how they'll handle the right-of-way costs. Mr. Kazmarski stated that's part of the entire funding picture. He noted the State has $600,000 ear marked for right-of-way acquisition costs at this time. He noted they will see how that plays out when the actual final design plans are generated.
Mr. Kazmarski stated the State told them this project was going to be delayed until 2006-2007 because even the current highway bill appropriation has not been funded by the Legislature and they're into half the year already.
Councilman Kaupin questioned how much land is being taken away for the Simon Road/Raffia intersection. Mr. Colintino stated they will need some land from the business, and they will be talking with that business owner. He noted the entrance will probably have to move, and they may have to compensate this property owner to do another parking lot within his property.
Councilman Kaupin questioned what is the proposed new setback for the package store to the edge of the street. Mr. Colintino stated his belief whatever the setback is now will stay.
Councilman Kaupin questioned the land taking at the one-way road, and Mr. Colintino stated it's a sliver, and there shouldn't be much impact.
Councilman Peruta stated when traveling South on Raffia and turning right onto Post Office Road, the crosswalk is 20 or 30 feet in from the intersection. He questioned if there are any plans to move that crosswalk back to the intersection. Mr. Colintino stated with the new intersection, the crosswalk will be much closer to the intersection itself. He pointed out there will be a traffic signal at this intersection.
Councilman Crowley questioned if there's been any thought of converting the one-way road back into a two-way road. Mr. Colintino noted that area is very narrow.
Councilman Mangini questioned why they decided on Alternate A. Mr. Colintino stated they looked at different alternatives and they felt this plan was the most prudent plan.
Mr. Shanley stated the reason the Town was able to get the federal grant in the first place was because the bikeway feeds the Scantic River Park and the greenbelt. Mr. Kazmarski stated the other reason why the north side was chosen as most preferable for the bikeway was because JFK Middle School is on the north side and bikers don't have to cross a major road. He added the Mancuso Recreation area is on the north side. He stated they envision this being the feeder for bicycle traffic.
Mr. Kazmarski stated under the STP program, in order to get 80% federal monies and 20% state funding on this project, the Town is required to fund the complete design process. He added they have to pick up some of the state portion for non-participating items, i.e., bikeway costs. He noted they also share some of the right-of-way acquisition costs.
Chairman Tallarita stated the Public Information meeting is on September 21, 2004 at Harriet Beecher Stowe Elementary School. He encouraged residents to attend this informational meeting.
DISCUSSION RE: AMERICAN LEGION LEASE
Present for this discussion were Robert Rookey, Chairman of the American Legion, Post 80 and Michael Murdza, Commander of American Legion, Post 80.
Mr. Rookey stated they are looking for a long-term agreement to put in a ball diamond. He noted they would like to reactivate the Sons of the Legion baseball team. He added the Town could use this baseball field as well.
Councilman Egan requested clarification as to the length of the lease. Mr. Rookey responded 25 or 50 years. He noted they are hoping for the longer term.
Councilman Edgar stated before renewing the lease, he would like to see up-to-date insurance and the Legion's articles of incorporation. Mr. Rookey indicated those items are in place.
Councilman Crowley voiced his support of this. He noted the Legion has been a good neighbor in Enfield. He added he would like to see a baseball field in this area.
Councilman Kaupin questioned who would maintain the fields. Mr. Rookey stated he expects the Legion would do that. He added if the Town also used this field, they'd appreciate a little help with certain things.
Councilman Kaupin stated he doesn't see a problem moving forward with this.
Councilman Kaupin stated if they were to re-do the lease, what would the next step be. Mr. Shanley stated since both sides would be in agreement to re-open the lease, it would be very easy to do. He noted they would redraft it with a different year. He noted they might consider putting a time limit on it of perhaps ten years. He explained if it hasn't been developed in a certain time frame, then it would revert back to a shorter lease.
Councilman Kaupin questioned whether a lease requires Council action. Mr. Shanley responded yes.
Councilman Kaupin questioned if the north side of this site has any wetlands issues. Mr. Rookey noted there's a brook way in the back. Mr. Shanley pointed out whatever is developed would have to meet site plan approval.
Councilman Mangini voiced her support of this proposal. She noted she agrees with the Town Manager's suggestion of a caveat. She added she would like the Town Attorney to review the lease. Mr. Shanley pointed out the Town Attorney reviews all leases.
Councilman Reveruzzi stated he would like to see incorporated in the lease wording that says as long as the American Legion occupies that property, then the lease would be in effect.
Chairman Tallarita stated he can't foresee the Town using that land over the next few years. He agreed with the inclusion of a caveat. He requested the Town Manager draft something.
It was agreed to go with a 50-year lease, with a ten-year caveat.
OLD BUSINESS
APPOINTMENTS (TOWN COUNCIL)
MOTION #7361 by Councilman Fiore, seconded by Councilman Kaupin to remove Item #6 from the table.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #7361 adopted 10-0-0.
NOMINATION #7362 by Councilman Fiore to reappoint K. Walter Shermer (U) to the Area 25 Cable Television Advisory Committee for a term which expires 6/30/06.
MOTION #7363 by Councilman Mangini, seconded by Councilman Kaupin to close nominations.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #7363 adopted 10-0-0.
Upon a ROLL-CALL vote being taken, the Chair declared K. Walter Shermer reappointed to the Area 25 Cable Television Advisory Committee by a 10-0-0 vote.
All other Town Council appointments remained tabled.
APPOINTMENTS (TOWN MANAGER)
All Town Manager appointments remained tabled.
Items c. and d. remained tabled.
MOTION #7364 by Councilman Reveruzzi, seconded by Councilman Crowley to remove Item e. from the table.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #7364 adopted 10-0-0.
DISCUSSION RE: COMMUNITY CENTER/OLD SENIOR CENTER
Councilman Reveruzzi requested the Town Manager set a meeting for this item. Mr. Shanley indicated he would do that
Chairman Tallarita stated his understanding another entity is interested in occupying some space at the old senior center. He requested Councilman Reveruzzi be provided information on this.
MOTION #7365 by Councilman Mangini, seconded by Councilman Peruta to retable Item e.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #7365 adopted 10-0-0.
MOTION #7366 by Councilman Fiore, seconded by Councilman Kaupin to remove Item f. from the table.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #7366 adopted 10-0-0.
DISCUSSION RE: CONDO TRASH
Mr. Shanley stated the Council has the redrafted agreement and they are looking to receive 3,000 tipper barrels this month. He noted the truck has been ordered and they expect it in January. He explained once the tipper barrels are in place they can sell them and get started on a condo-by-condo organization basis as soon as the Council has agreed to an agreement and the Council receives the signed agreement from a condominiumassociation. He added this would apply if they are using tipper barrels. He went on to note if an association is going with a front-end unit, they have to wait until the truck is delivered in January and they can perhaps look at March as a start date for the service.
Councilman Fiore referred to Page 1, Item 1 - "to collect refuse and recyclable materials", and questioned if by definition will that exclude leaf pick-up and the grass clippings. Attorney Bromson stated his belief it would, but to be clear it should be stated in the agreement. Councilman Fiore stated he wants it abundantly clear that this does not include picking up yard waste.
Councilman Fiore questioned whether it was the intent that condo associations could participate in the bulky waste system for the fee, and Mr. Shanley indicated that's up to the Council.
Councilman Fiore referred to Page 2, Item 6, where it states associations should purchase at least one tipper barrel for each unit if they are not front loading. He noted he did not see any reference to the recycling bin within the agreement. He questioned if this has to be specifically stated in this agreement.
Mr. McAlmond stated recycling bins have always been free to residents. Councilman Fiore stated his impression they would not have to make reference to the recycling bins since they will be free.
Councilman Fiore questioned whether they should discuss bulky waste. Mr. Shanley noted this is a major issue for condo associations because they have to pile this material in front yards and schedule a pick-up. He stated his belief every association may feel differently about this service. He went on to suggest excluding it until such time as there is a movement to include it.
Councilman Fiore referred to Items 9, 10, 11 and 12 where they're looking for some specific dates. He stated he would like to see the Council settle on some dates. Mr. Shanley stated it was the Council's intention that the recycling rebate stops entirely whether or not an association opts for municipal service. He noted the agreement could state "upon execution of the document, the refund process disappears, and as of January 1, 2005 it disappears completely".
Councilman Kaupin stated he would go a little later than January 1 because they don't get the front-end loader until sometime in January. He feels it should coincide with the start-up of the full front-end loader pick-up and cut everyone off at that point in time. He further clarified when the service begins, that association's recycling rebate ends, but for the whole Town - PRD's - it ends March 1st, even for those that decide not to participate.
Mr. Shanley questioned whether this would be difficult, administratively, for Mr. McAlmond. Mr. McAlmond responded yes and noted they did not carry any funds in the budget for recycling rebates, therefore, they would have to do a transfer if that's the case. He stated it was their understanding during the budget process that as of July 1st there would be no more reimbursements. He added they can change that at Council direction.
It was agreed Item 9 would read July 1, 2004.
Councilman Fiore referred to Item 10 - "The association shall not request the Town cease the collection of refuse and recyclable materials for a period of….." Mr. McAlmond stated they planned on a ten-year payback replacement on the truck, therefore, he believes the associations need to opt into the service for somewhere between five and ten years. It was agreed to go with ten years. Councilman Fiore noted Item 10 should read as follows: "The association shall not request the Town cease the collection of refuse and recyclable materials for a period of ten years from the date that they sign this agreement."
Councilman Fiore referred to Item 11 and the opt-out clause for the association - "The association shall provide the Town with written notice thereof at least_________days prior to the commencement of the next following fiscal year of July 1st." It was agreed associations have to provide five years notice for opting out of this service.
Councilman Fiore referred to Item 12 and it was agreed this should also read five years.
Councilman Kaupin pointed out an adjustment has to be made on the numbering of these paragraphs.
Councilman Fiore recapped those items just reviewed:
" Exclude yard waste in Item 1
" July 1, 2004 date in Item 9
" Ten years - Item 10
" First date in Item 11 will be six months
" Second date in Item 11 will be five years
" The Town Attorney will adjust paragraph numbers
Councilman Kaupin requested the Town Attorney address Items 3, 4 and 5 regarding liability issues. Attorney Bromson stated they communicated the concerns from the letter that they received and they agreed upon the changes. He noted they couldn't find an agreement from area towns. He stated questions raised were legitimate and he feels they were able to accommodate their concerns in Items 3 and 5, and he believes it's fair to both sides. As concerns workers' compensation, he does not know what situations might arise, and he does not know where that language came from, however, he will look at this again.
Councilman Crowley stated some condo associations have recyclable dumpsters. He stated his understanding there will only be solid waste dumpsters and recycling bins, and Mr. McAlmond indicated that's correct.
Councilman Crowley stated if a dumpster is not accessible to the Town of Enfield, i.e., a car is blocking access to it, does the Town expect to come back later. Mr. McAlmond stated they typically have a contact person, and they can establish such a person for each association. He noted if there's a problem at any particular complex, they can call that contact person to resolve the problem.
Councilman Fiore referred to language in the resolution as follows: "The PRD's shall guarantee compliance with all rules and regulations by the Town in the municipal collection of refuse and recyclables within PRD's." Attorney Bromson stated this language should be incorporated at the appropriate place in the agreement.
Councilman Egan questioned where an "over 50 development" fall into this. Attorney Bromson stated they are looking into that and he will report on this next time.
Councilman Fiore stated a resolution was passed a couple years ago stating their intent to start this no sooner than July 1, 2003. Mr. Shanley stated when the Council decides on the agreement, they can rescind the resolution.
Councilman Kaupin questioned what the wording would be in the case of an opt-in for a new development. Attorney Bromson stated the Council would have to set a policy regarding when new developments would be eligible to get this service. Mr. Shanley stated his belief the Town should know by January 1st because budgets are being worked on in December. Chairman Tallarita stated there should be an open enrollment period, and if they haven't entered into the agreement during that period, then they have to wait until the next fiscal year.
Attorney Bromson stated his impression Public Works should know before an agreement is signed whether or not there's going to be any pick-up problems. Mr. McAlmond agreed. He noted originally a survey was done on all the condo associations to determine what should be recommended for the pick-up style for each complex. He stated in a couple cases it will change from what they're currently doing. He noted they do need the ability to establish what mode they plan to use in picking up trash at a particular complex. Attorney Bromson stated if such language isn't already included in the agreement, they need to say the mode and manner will be determined by the Public Works Department.
Mr. McAlmond stated his belief the reference to the current existing ordinances gives Public Works that authority. Attorney Bromson stated this may be contained in Item 8, but if not, he believes this is of such importance that they may just put it separate.
Mr. Kazmarski stated when excluding yard waste, it should state specifically that yard waste, grass clippings, and leaves will not be collected. He noted some people consider leaves and yard waste as recyclables. He pointed out the majority of condo associations hire professional landscapers to do their mowing, trimming of branches, etc., and the Town does not want to become the receptacle of all that refuse that the landscapers are getting paid to remove.
Mr. Kazmarski stated bulky waste is the Council's decision, however, he reminded the Council that bulky waste is a losing proposition for the Town for the fees that they charge. He noted it also raises a problem because sometimes the materials have to sit on front lawns for a few days. Mr. Shanley pointed out bulky waste is being excluded.
Mr. Kazmarski questioned if this will include or exclude the over 55 communities. Attorney Bromson stated he will be looking into this. Mr. Shanley stated he does not know, as a practical matter, whether they can exclude those communities.
Councilman Crowley questioned what point the Town starts service in the case of partially completed developments. Councilman Kaupin stated two-thirds of the units have to be filled before the association can begin. Attorney Bromson indicated he would look into when service starts.
Councilman Peruta questioned the bulky waste issue, and Mr. McAlmond explained each condo association has certain rules as to what they can and cannot have in their yards, and this may govern whether they can put out bulky waste. Mr. Shanley recommended excluding bulky waste at this point, and if there's a swell of demand for bulky waste pick-up service at condos, they can get into specifics such as condo rules, etc. He noted this is not intended to be exclusionary, but rather it's intended to clear as many roadblocks as possible so that they can proceed with this service.
Chairman Tallarita stated his understanding the Town Attorney and his staff will take a look at this agreement and bring it back to the Council for approval so that they can go forward and enter into agreements with the condo associations.
Mr. Shanley stated his belief the Council needs to make a decision as to whether or not they have one agreement only, or are they going to negotiate different things with different condo associations. Chairman Tallarita stated his impression the sentiment that has come from the Council is that they're going to have one agreement. Mr. Shanley stated if that's the case, there is no negotiation on the agreement, therefore, they can simply send the agreement to the presidents of the associations.
MOTION #7367 by Councilman Fiore, seconded by Councilman Mangini to retable Item f.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #7367 adopted 10-0-0.
MOTION #7368 by Councilman Kaupin, seconded by Councilman Mangini to remove item g. from the table.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #7368 adopted 10-0-0.
DISCUSSION RE: SOUTH MAPLE STREET BRIDGE PRELIMINARY PLANS
Councilman Mangini questioned when they will be looking at the bridge structure. Mr. Kazmarski stated they first wanted to resolve the road and bridge alignment. He noted if they go with Alternate #1, then the design firm will prepare at least three structure-type studies upon which they will be able to generate some cost estimates. He stated based on previous discussions, a covered bridge is no longer being considered.
Councilman Kaupin agreed with Alternate #1 and he prefers maintaining the stop conditions at the entrances to the bridge. He added his belief a two-lane bridge would be safer. He feels they can get a very aesthetically pleasing bridge for the area from the three designs.
Councilman Reveruzzi questioned whether this location and design of the bridge provide for sidewalks and fishing capability from the bridge. Mr. Kazmarski stated the designers mentioned they could provide sidewalk access across the bridge on one or both sides. As concerns fishing off the bridge, they may need additional railing. He noted if the Council wishes the designer to look at that as a side alternate, they can look into that.
Councilman Egan voiced her support of Alternate #1.
Councilman Crowley stated one item discussed was parking. He questioned whether curbing will be included to eliminate side-road parking. Mr. Kazmarski stated they will have to look into that. He added they can look into providing some parking in this area.
Chairman Tallarita stated it appears the consensus is to go with Alternate #1.
Mr. Kazmarski questioned whether the Council wants to consider some type of lighting at both ends of the bridge for night traffic. Mr. Shanley recommended including this in the design as an option.
DISCUSSION RE: CONSENT AGENDA DISCUSSION
This will appear on the next agenda.
NEW BUSINESS
APPOINTMENTS (TOWN COUNCIL)
The appointment to the Beautification Committee will appear under Old Business on the next agenda.
ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION
APPOINTMENTS (TOWN COUNCIL)
The appointment to the Loan Review Committee will appear under New Business on the next agenda.
MISCELLANEOUS
RESOLUTION #7369 by Councilman Mangini, seconded by Councilman Kaupin.
RESOLVED, that in accordance with Chapter VI, Section 8(f) of the Town Charter, the following transfer is hereby made:
TO: Public Works Administration $250,000.00
Acct. #310-3100-8138 Higgins/
Annex Renovations
FROM: Public Works-Bldg. & GroundsMaintenance
Acct. #310-3400-8138 Higgins/
Annex Renovations $250,000.00
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify the amount of $250,000.00 is available from Account #310-3400-8138 as of 8/13/2004.
/s/ Gregory Simmons, Director of Finance
Upon a ROLL-CALL vote being taken, the Chair declared RESOLUTION #7369 adopted 10-0-0.
MOTION #7370 by Councilman Fiore, seconded by Councilman Tait to waive the reading of the resolution.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #7370 adopted 10-0-0.
RESOLUTION #7371 by Councilman Kaupin, seconded by Councilman Egan.
Neighborhood Services Grant
Upon a ROLL-CALL vote being taken, the Chair declared RESOLUTION #7371 adopted 10-0-0.
MOTION #7372 by Councilman Fiore, seconded by Councilman Mangini to waive the reading of the resolution.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #7372 adopted 10-0-0.
RESOLUTION #7373 by Councilman Tait, seconded by Councilman Mangini.
Social Service Block Grant
Upon a ROLL-CALL vote being taken, the Chair declared RESOLUTION #7373 adopted 10-0-0.
MOTION #7374 by Councilman Fiore, seconded by Councilman Mangini to waive the reading of the resolution.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #7374 adopted 10-0-0.
RESOLUTION #7375 by Councilman Tait, seconded by Councilman Mangini.
Child Day Care Program
Upon a ROLL-CALL vote being taken, the Chair declared RESOLUTION #7375 adopted 10-0-0.
RESOLUTION #7376 by Councilman Tait, seconded by Councilman Mangini.
RESOLVED, that the Enfield Town Council does hereby approve the four (4) year collective bargaining agreement between the Town of Enfield and the Connecticut State Employees Union Local 760 Supervisory Unit dated July 1, 2004 through June 30, 2008.
Upon a ROLL-CALL vote being taken, the Chair declared RESOLUTION #7376 adopted 10-0-0.
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
Mrs. Collins, the Hazardville Section
Stated her belief it is rude for Council members not to use their microphones.
Mrs. Collins referred to the South Road day care facility and questioned how much rent is being paid for this facility. She questioned how this day care is supported. Mr. Shanley stated he would discuss this with Mrs. Collins after the meeting.
Mrs. Collins stated there is over 108 acres around the Scantic River. She noted this property abuts her property and continues across the river. She requested someone check into camping and drug problems in this area. She pointed out this happens on her side of the river.
COUNCILMAN COMMUNICATIONS
No comments were made.
ADJOURNMENT
MOTION #7377 by Councilman Tait, seconded by Councilman Mangini to adjourn.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #7377 adopted 10-0-0, and the meeting stood adjourned at 10:00 p.m.
|
|